正在加载美国股市状态…
➜
如何开始
只需几分钟即可完成完整系统设置。
打开快速入门指南 →
公开目录 · DEVIOLAB

策略目录

探索算法策略、比较表现,并查看每个模型的完整历史。
每个算法策略都对应一个真实的交易代理(Trading Bot),由 DevioLab 团队基于历史数据测试创建。它可用于受支持平台(包括 Binance)的 API 自动交易,也可仅作为 Signal Bot,通过 Telegram 和电子邮件发送通知。
2 · 代码
⌕
筛选
所有已选条件共同生效
行业与分组筛选
交易所可用性
A · Agilent Technologies Inc. (4) AAOI · Applied Optoelectronics Inc. (5) AAPL · Apple Inc. (7) ABBV · AbbVie Inc. (4) ABNB · Airbnb Inc. (4) ABT · Abbott Laboratories (4) ACGL · Arch Capital Group Ltd. (4) ACN · Accenture PLC Class A (4) ADBE · Adobe Inc. (3) ADI · Analog Devices Inc. (4) ADM · Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (4) ADP · Automatic Data Processing Inc. (4) ADSK · Autodesk Inc. (4) AEE · Ameren Corporation (4) AEP · American Electric Power Company, Inc. (4) AES · The AES Corporation (3) AFL · Aflac Incorporated (4) AIG · American International Group, Inc. (4) AIZ · Assurant Inc. (4) AJG · Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (4) AKAM · Akamai Technologies Inc. (4) ALAB · Astera Labs, Inc. (7) ALB · Albemarle Corporation (4) ALGN · Align Technology Inc. (4) ALL · The Allstate Corporation (4) ALLE · Allegion plc (4) ALNY · Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (4) AMAT · Applied Materials Inc. (7) AMCR · Amcor plc (4) AMD · Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (7) AME · AMETEK, Inc. (4) AMGN · Amgen Inc. (2) AMP · Ameriprise Financial Inc. (4) AMT · American Tower Corporation (4) AMZN · Amazon.com Inc. (7) ANET · Arista Networks Inc. (4) AON · Aon plc Class A (4) AOS · A. O. Smith Corporation (4) APA · APA Corporation (4) APD · Air Products and Chemicals Inc. (4) APH · Amphenol Corp. (4) APO · Apollo Global Management Inc. (4) APP · AppLovin Corporation (4) APTV · Aptiv PLC (4) ARE · Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (4) ARES · Ares Management Corp. (4) ARM · Arm Holdings plc ADR (7) ASML · ASML Holding N.V. NY (7) ASTS · AST SpaceMobile Inc. (6) ATO · Atmos Energy Corporation (4) AVGO · Broadcom Inc. (7) AVY · Avery Dennison Corporation (4) AWK · American Water Works Company, Inc. (4) AXON · Axon Enterprise, Inc. (4) AXP · American Express Company (4) AZO · AutoZone, Inc. (4) BA · Boeing Co/The (4) BABA · Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. ADR (6) BAC · Bank of America Corp. (4) BALL · Ball Corporation (4) BAX · Baxter International Inc. (4) BBY · Best Buy Co., Inc. (4) BDX · Becton, Dickinson and Company (4) BE · Bloom Energy Corp. (5) BEN · Franklin Templeton Inc. (4) BF.B · Brown-Forman Corp. (4) BG · Bunge Global SA (4) BIIB · Biogen Inc. (4) BK · The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (4) BKNG · Booking Holdings Inc. (4) BKR · Baker Hughes Company (4) BLDR · Builders FirstSource Inc. (3) BLK · BlackRock Inc. (4) BMNR · BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (5) BMY · Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (3) BNY · Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (3) BR · Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (4) BRK.B · Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B (4) BRO · Brown & Brown Inc. (4) BSX · Boston Scientific Corp. (3) BX · Blackstone Inc. (4) BXP · BXP, Inc. (4) C · Citigroup Inc. (4) CAH · Cardinal Health Inc. (4) CARR · Carrier Global Corp. (4) CASY · Casey's General Stores, Inc. (4) CAT · Caterpillar Inc. (4) CB · Chubb Limited (4) CBOE · Cboe Global Markets Inc. (4) CBRE · CBRE Group Inc. (4) CCEP · Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (4) CCI · Crown Castle Inc. (4) CCL · Carnival Corporation Ltd. (4) CDNS · Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (4) CDW · CDW Corporation (3) CEG · Constellation Energy Corporation (4) CF · CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (4) CFG · Citizens Financial Group Inc. (4) CHD · Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (4) CHRW · C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. (4) CHTR · Charter Communications Inc. (4) CI · The Cigna Group (4) CIEN · Ciena Corporation (4) CINF · Cincinnati Financial Corporation (3) CL · Colgate-Palmolive Co. (4) CLX · The Clorox Company (4) CMCSA · Comcast Corp. (4) CME · CME Group Inc. (4) CMG · Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (4) CMI · Cummins Inc. (4) CMS · CMS Energy Corporation (3) CNC · Centene Corp. (4) CNP · CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (4) COF · Capital One Financial Corp. (4) COHR · Coherent Corp. (7) COIN · Coinbase Global Inc. (3) COO · The Cooper Companies, Inc. (3) COP · ConocoPhillips (4) COR · Cencora Inc. (4) COST · Costco Wholesale Corporation (4) CPAY · Corpay Inc. (4) CPRT · Copart, Inc. (4) CPT · Camden Property Trust (4) CRCL · Circle Internet Group Inc. (5) CRDO · Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (8) CRH · CRH plc (4) CRL · Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (4) CRM · Salesforce, Inc. (4) CRWD · CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (4) CSCO · Cisco Systems Inc. (4) CSGP · CoStar Group, Inc. (4) CSX · CSX Corporation (4) CTAS · Cintas Corporation (4) CTSH · Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. (3) CTVA · Corteva Inc. (4) DELL · Dell Technologies Inc. (6) EWY · iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (6) FLNC · Fluence Energy, Inc. (7) GS · The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (6) HOOD · Robinhood Markets Inc. (7) IBM · International Business Machines Corporation (6) INTC · Intel Corporation (6) IREN · IREN Limited (7) LITE · Lumentum Holdings Inc. (6) META · Meta Platforms Inc. (7) MRVL · Marvell Technology, Inc. (6) MSFT · Microsoft Corporation (7) MSTR · Strategy Inc. (7) MU · Micron Technology Inc. (7) NFLX · Netflix Inc. (8) NOK · Nokia Corporation Sponsored ADR (7) NVDA · NVIDIA Corporation (7) PLTR · Palantir Technologies Inc. (7) PYPL · PayPal Holdings, Inc. (6) QQQ · Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (6) RKLB · Rocket Lab Corporation (4) SKHY · SK hynix Inc. ADR (3) SMCI · Super Micro Computer Inc. (6) SMH · VanEck Semiconductor ETF (4) SNDK · Sandisk Corp. (4) SOXS · Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (3) SPCX · Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (3) TSLA · Tesla, Inc. (6) TSM · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. ADR (5) USAR · USA Rare Earth, Inc. (3)
所选策略概览

CF · CF Industries Holdings, Inc.

Stock Universe · 全球股票市场
USD · NYSE · XNYS · United States
CF 0 +11020.79% 1TRAD-TJU5
DevioLab 推荐 · Core 1 iDevioLab 主要推荐:更加防御、平稳且稳定的配置,重点控制风险和回撤。
DevioLab 推荐 · Core 2 iDevioLab 更激进的推荐:接受更高风险和更深回撤,以换取潜在更高回报。
147交易
80.3%胜率
+3.68%平均交易
+31.07%最佳交易
-19.22%最差交易
+255.7%年化
策略分析档案 · f7fe3f6af1c0104e

Quantifying High-Win-Rate Swing Logic for CF: An In-Depth Analysis of a Core 15-Minute Algorithmic Strategy

This analytical report evaluates the top-ranked algorithmic trading strategy for CF stock on a 15-minute timeframe. Spanning over seven years of backtested data from September 2019 through September 2026, the strategy generated 147 completed trades with an exceptionally high win rate of 80.27 percent and a profit factor of 5.0. Demonstrating strong statistical consistency across changing market regimes, the system yields an average trade return of 3.69 percent alongside a median trade return of 3.94 percent, showing that returns are distributed broadly rather than relying on rare outliers. With a maximum historical drawdown of 21.75 percent and a maximum losing streak of just two trades, the strategy provides an exceptionally resilient performance profile suitable for implementation in automated trading bots, trading robots, and quantitative trading agents. This study breaks down the position duration, yearly distribution, winner concentration, and recent validation since June 2024 to evaluate the robustness of its cumulative backtested return of 11,020.79 percent.

分析日期: 30.09.2026. 策略数据单独更新。
阅读完整分析

Strategy profile

The evaluated algorithmic model represents the primary core strategy for CF stock within the DevioLab framework, earning a top rank for this symbol with a DevioLab score of 81.38. Operating on a 15-minute candle interval, the system translates intraday micro-price action into multi-day positions, bridging short-term price discovery with medium-term swing movements. Over a simulated evaluation period of 7.04 years spanning from September 16, 2019 to September 30, 2026, the strategy generated 147 completed trade cycles. Across this dataset, the model produced a cumulative simulated return of 11,020.79 percent, corresponding to an annualized metric of 261.58 percent. The overall trade accuracy stands at 80.27 percent, with 118 winning outcomes against 29 losing outcomes. This statistical structure produces an overall profit factor of 5.0, reflecting a highly efficient relationship between gross profits and gross losses. Designed to function as the decision engine for automated trading bots, trading robots, and systematic trading agents, the strategy relies on selective execution parameters that prioritize trade quality and statistical expectancy over trade frequency.

Trading rhythm and position duration

Despite operating on a 15-minute price chart, the strategy exhibits the holding profile of a classic multi-day swing system rather than a high-frequency scalper. Across the 147 completed positions, the average holding time was 285.68 hours (approximately 11.9 days), while the median holding duration registered at 168.00 hours (exactly 7.0 days). This disparity between mean and median holding times indicates that while half of all trades resolve within a single calendar week, select positions are maintained across multiple weeks to capture extended directional moves. The strategy completed an average of 20.88 trades per year, which translates to approximately 1.99 active trades per month. On average, 17.46 days elapsed between trade exits, with a median spacing of 13.81 days. For execution via automated trading bots or algorithmic trading agents, this low-frequency rhythm implies limited turnover and reduced exposure to execution friction, allowing the model to navigate intraday price noise on the 15-minute timeframe while capturing macroeconomic trends in CF stock.

Quality of historical results

The structural quality of the strategy's returns is highlighted by the close alignment between its average trade performance and its median trade performance. The average trade gain across all 147 closed trades stands at 3.69 percent, while the median trade return is slightly higher at 3.94 percent. In quantitative strategy evaluation, a median that matches or exceeds the average indicates that historical profits are generated uniformly across standard trades rather than being inflated by a small handfull of massive winners. Furthermore, the three largest winning trades accounted for only 10.63 percent of total gross profits. This exceptionally low concentration ratio confirms that the strategy's high performance is broad-based and statistically stable. The historical payoff range extends from a single best trade return of 31.07 percent to a worst trade loss of -19.22 percent. Combined with the overall 80.27 percent win rate, the system exhibits strong positive expectation on every trade event executed by automated trading systems.

Risk, drawdown and losing behavior

Risk parameters demonstrate significant resilience throughout the seven-year testing sample. The maximum historical drawdown was constrained to 21.75 percent, a moderate equity pullback given the overall cumulative return of 11,020.79 percent. The losing behavior of the model is notably disciplined: the longest consecutive losing streak across 147 historical trades was capped at just two trades. This low loss cluster rate means that equity drawdowns were historically brief and recovered rapidly, minimizing extended drawdown duration. The strategy's worst single trade loss of -19.22 percent represents a defined tail risk event, but its impact was consistently mitigated by the strategy's high win frequency (80.27 percent) and strong profit factor of 5.0. From a risk management perspective for automated trading agents and execution bots, the combination of short losing streaks and modest maximum drawdown supports consistent capital allocation strategies.

Behavior through time and yearly stability

An examination of yearly breakdown statistics reveals consistent profitability across distinct market conditions for CF stock. Following an initial setup phase in late 2019 consisting of 2 trades with a sum return of -1.94 percent, the strategy established a multi-year track record of positive performance. In 2020, the strategy recorded 21 trades, a 71.43 percent win rate, and a summed trade return of 100.88 percent. Performance peaked during 2021 and 2022, generating 131.63 percent across 25 trades (84.00 percent win rate) and 116.02 percent across 23 trades (86.96 percent win rate), respectively. The system remained positive during 2023 with 22 trades, an 81.82 percent win rate, and a summed gain of 23.97 percent. In 2024, performance rebounded with 16 trades, an 81.25 percent win rate, and a summed return of 48.55 percent. The model generated 16.16 percent in 2025 across 16 trades (68.75 percent win rate) before accelerating in 2026 to produce 107.41 percent across 22 trades with an 86.36 percent win rate. The strategy consistently generated positive summed returns across every full calendar year tested.

Recent period since 2024-06-01 versus full history

The performance window starting June 1, 2024 provides crucial evidence regarding the recent effectiveness of the algorithmic model. During this period, the strategy recorded 46 completed trades, representing 31.29 percent of its total lifetime trades. Summed returns during this recent sub-period reached 148.54 percent. Because 46 trade events offer a robust statistical sample size, this recent period confirms that the strategy's edge in CF stock has remained active and sustained rather than decaying over time. Comparing recent trade density with historical averages shows a slight increase in trade execution rate, as 46 trades occurred across approximately 2.33 years. The strategy's ability to continue producing substantial cumulative gains in modern market conditions offers quantitative validation for systematic deployment in live trading robots and trading agents.

Strengths and limitations

The primary strength of this strategy lies in its high statistical expectancy, driven by an 80.27 percent win rate, a 5.0 profit factor, and a broad distribution of returns where the top three trades account for only 10.63 percent of gross profit. The system's disciplined losing streak ceiling of two trades further reduces capital drawdown risk. However, specific structural limitations must be noted. The worst trade loss of -19.22 percent indicates that while losing trades are rare, individual drawdowns on failed positions can be significant relative to the average trade gain of 3.69 percent. Additionally, with an average holding time of 285.68 hours, positions are held open across multiple overnight sessions and weekends, exposing active positions to gap risk in CF equity price action that cannot be adjusted while markets are closed.

DevioLab analytical conclusion

With a DevioLab score of 81.38 and a number-one rank for CF stock, this 15-minute algorithmic strategy represents a robust, highly stable swing trading framework. Its statistical profile balances high accuracy (80.27 percent win rate) with controlled equity pullbacks (21.75 percent maximum drawdown) and low top-winner dependency. The strong historical output across both multi-year full data and the recent post-June 2024 window confirms the underlying edge of the system logic. Designed for implementation within automated trading bots, trading robots, and algorithmic agents, the system provides a structured mechanism for capturing multi-day trend movements in CF stock while filtering out lower-probability intraday signals.

Data scope and methodology

This analysis is based strictly on backtested, simulated historical trade data for CF stock across the 15-minute interval covering September 16, 2019 through September 30, 2026. All reported performance metrics, including total return percentages, win rates, drawdown figures, holding durations, and profit factors, are computed from closed trade records within this specific simulation environment. Historical strategy results do not include real-world slippage, execution fees, borrow costs, or unexpected market liquidity conditions. Past backtested performance is strictly evaluative and does not guarantee future live trading results.

完整策略分析