正在加载美国股市状态…
➜
如何开始
只需几分钟即可完成完整系统设置。
打开快速入门指南 →
公开目录 · DEVIOLAB

策略目录

探索算法策略、比较表现,并查看每个模型的完整历史。
每个算法策略都对应一个真实的交易代理(Trading Bot),由 DevioLab 团队基于历史数据测试创建。它可用于受支持平台(包括 Binance)的 API 自动交易,也可仅作为 Signal Bot,通过 Telegram 和电子邮件发送通知。
2 · 代码
⌕
筛选
所有已选条件共同生效
行业与分组筛选
交易所可用性
A · Agilent Technologies Inc. (4) AAOI · Applied Optoelectronics Inc. (5) AAPL · Apple Inc. (7) ABBV · AbbVie Inc. (4) ABNB · Airbnb Inc. (4) ABT · Abbott Laboratories (4) ACGL · Arch Capital Group Ltd. (4) ACN · Accenture PLC Class A (4) ADBE · Adobe Inc. (3) ADI · Analog Devices Inc. (4) ADM · Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (4) ADP · Automatic Data Processing Inc. (4) ADSK · Autodesk Inc. (4) AEE · Ameren Corporation (4) AEP · American Electric Power Company, Inc. (4) AES · The AES Corporation (3) AFL · Aflac Incorporated (4) AIG · American International Group, Inc. (4) AIZ · Assurant Inc. (4) AJG · Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (4) AKAM · Akamai Technologies Inc. (4) ALAB · Astera Labs, Inc. (7) ALB · Albemarle Corporation (4) ALGN · Align Technology Inc. (4) ALL · The Allstate Corporation (4) ALLE · Allegion plc (4) ALNY · Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (4) AMAT · Applied Materials Inc. (7) AMCR · Amcor plc (4) AMD · Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (7) AME · AMETEK, Inc. (4) AMGN · Amgen Inc. (2) AMP · Ameriprise Financial Inc. (4) AMT · American Tower Corporation (4) AMZN · Amazon.com Inc. (7) ANET · Arista Networks Inc. (4) AON · Aon plc Class A (4) AOS · A. O. Smith Corporation (4) APA · APA Corporation (4) APD · Air Products and Chemicals Inc. (4) APH · Amphenol Corp. (4) APO · Apollo Global Management Inc. (4) APP · AppLovin Corporation (4) APTV · Aptiv PLC (4) ARE · Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (4) ARES · Ares Management Corp. (4) ARM · Arm Holdings plc ADR (7) ASML · ASML Holding N.V. NY (7) ASTS · AST SpaceMobile Inc. (6) ATO · Atmos Energy Corporation (4) AVGO · Broadcom Inc. (7) AVY · Avery Dennison Corporation (4) AWK · American Water Works Company, Inc. (4) AXON · Axon Enterprise, Inc. (4) AXP · American Express Company (4) AZO · AutoZone, Inc. (4) BA · Boeing Co/The (4) BABA · Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. ADR (6) BAC · Bank of America Corp. (4) BALL · Ball Corporation (4) BAX · Baxter International Inc. (4) BBY · Best Buy Co., Inc. (4) BDX · Becton, Dickinson and Company (4) BE · Bloom Energy Corp. (5) BEN · Franklin Templeton Inc. (4) BF.B · Brown-Forman Corp. (4) BG · Bunge Global SA (4) BIIB · Biogen Inc. (4) BK · The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (4) BKNG · Booking Holdings Inc. (4) BKR · Baker Hughes Company (4) BLDR · Builders FirstSource Inc. (3) BLK · BlackRock Inc. (4) BMNR · BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (5) BMY · Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (3) BNY · Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (3) BR · Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (4) BRK.B · Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B (4) BRO · Brown & Brown Inc. (4) BSX · Boston Scientific Corp. (3) BX · Blackstone Inc. (4) BXP · BXP, Inc. (4) C · Citigroup Inc. (4) CAH · Cardinal Health Inc. (4) CARR · Carrier Global Corp. (4) CASY · Casey's General Stores, Inc. (4) CAT · Caterpillar Inc. (4) CB · Chubb Limited (4) CBOE · Cboe Global Markets Inc. (4) CBRE · CBRE Group Inc. (4) CCEP · Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (4) CCI · Crown Castle Inc. (4) CCL · Carnival Corporation Ltd. (4) CDNS · Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (4) CDW · CDW Corporation (3) CEG · Constellation Energy Corporation (4) CF · CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (4) CFG · Citizens Financial Group Inc. (4) CHD · Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (4) CHRW · C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. (4) CHTR · Charter Communications Inc. (4) CI · The Cigna Group (4) CIEN · Ciena Corporation (4) CINF · Cincinnati Financial Corporation (3) CL · Colgate-Palmolive Co. (4) CLX · The Clorox Company (4) CMCSA · Comcast Corp. (4) CME · CME Group Inc. (4) CMG · Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (4) CMI · Cummins Inc. (4) CMS · CMS Energy Corporation (3) CNC · Centene Corp. (4) CNP · CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (4) COF · Capital One Financial Corp. (4) COHR · Coherent Corp. (7) COIN · Coinbase Global Inc. (3) COO · The Cooper Companies, Inc. (3) COP · ConocoPhillips (4) COR · Cencora Inc. (4) COST · Costco Wholesale Corporation (4) CPAY · Corpay Inc. (4) CPRT · Copart, Inc. (4) CPT · Camden Property Trust (4) CRCL · Circle Internet Group Inc. (5) CRDO · Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (8) CRH · CRH plc (4) CRL · Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (4) CRM · Salesforce, Inc. (4) CRWD · CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (4) CSCO · Cisco Systems Inc. (4) CSGP · CoStar Group, Inc. (4) CSX · CSX Corporation (4) CTAS · Cintas Corporation (4) CTSH · Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. (3) CTVA · Corteva Inc. (4) DELL · Dell Technologies Inc. (6) EWY · iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (6) FLNC · Fluence Energy, Inc. (7) GS · The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (6) HOOD · Robinhood Markets Inc. (7) IBM · International Business Machines Corporation (6) INTC · Intel Corporation (6) IREN · IREN Limited (7) LITE · Lumentum Holdings Inc. (6) META · Meta Platforms Inc. (7) MRVL · Marvell Technology, Inc. (6) MSFT · Microsoft Corporation (7) MSTR · Strategy Inc. (7) MU · Micron Technology Inc. (7) NFLX · Netflix Inc. (8) NOK · Nokia Corporation Sponsored ADR (7) NVDA · NVIDIA Corporation (7) PLTR · Palantir Technologies Inc. (7) PYPL · PayPal Holdings, Inc. (6) QQQ · Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (6) RKLB · Rocket Lab Corporation (4) SKHY · SK hynix Inc. ADR (3) SMCI · Super Micro Computer Inc. (6) SMH · VanEck Semiconductor ETF (4) SNDK · Sandisk Corp. (4) SOXS · Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (3) SPCX · Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (3) TSLA · Tesla, Inc. (6) TSM · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. ADR (5) USAR · USA Rare Earth, Inc. (3)
所选策略概览

BG · Bunge Global SA

Stock Universe · 全球股票市场
USD · NYSE · XNYS · United States
BG 0 +2569.09% 1TRAD-YWX2
DevioLab 推荐 · Core 1 iDevioLab 主要推荐:更加防御、平稳且稳定的配置,重点控制风险和回撤。
DevioLab 推荐 · Core 2 iDevioLab 更激进的推荐:接受更高风险和更深回撤,以换取潜在更高回报。
33交易
84.8%胜率
+11.53%平均交易
+53.32%最佳交易
-15.52%最差交易
+135.4%年化
策略分析档案 · d328a86232f0475c

Quantitative Analysis: BG · BG 15-Minute Positional Strategy Achieves 84.85% Win Rate and 6.25 Profit Factor Across Multi-Year Backtest

This analytical study evaluates the top-ranked algorithmic trading strategy for BG stock on the 15-minute timeframe. Over a 6.98-year testing window from September 2019 to September 2026, the strategy generated a cumulative closed-trade gain of +2569.09% (135.35% annualized) across 33 completed trades. Defined by extreme signal selectivity, the strategy averages only 4.73 trades per year while holding positions for an average of 1170.89 hours (approximately 48.8 days). With an 84.85% historical win rate (28 wins, 5 losses), a profit factor of 6.25, and a maximum drawdown capped at 15.52%, the quantitative profile reflects exceptional payoff asymmetry and structural stability across multiple market regimes.

分析日期: 23.09.2026. 策略数据单独更新。
阅读完整分析

Strategy profile

The strategy under examination represents the primary core strategy for BG within the DevioLab quantitative database, earning a DevioLab score of 84.92 and ranking first among evaluated models for this asset. Operating on a 15-minute execution interval, the system utilizes high-frequency price data to pinpoint entry and exit conditions, yet its actual trade execution frequency aligns with macro positional swing trading rather than high-frequency intraday trading. Across a 6.98-year evaluation window spanning from September 16, 2019, to September 8, 2026, the algorithm completed 33 closed trades. Out of these, 28 trades resulted in positive gains while 5 trades realized losses, establishing an overall win rate of 84.85%. Designed for automated implementation through trading bots, trading robots, or quantitative execution agents, the framework prioritizes trade selectivity over transaction volume, yielding a cumulative backtested return of +2569.09% and an annualized equivalent of 135.35%.

Trading rhythm and position duration

A defining characteristic of this algorithm is the stark contrast between its underlying 15-minute chart resolution and its extended multi-week holding times. Despite scanning intraday 15-minute bars, the average holding duration per position reaches 1170.89 hours (approximately 48.79 days), with a median holding period of 980.00 hours (roughly 40.83 days). The strategy executes an average of 4.73 trades per year, or approximately 1.03 trades per active month. Spacing between position exits is similarly spaced, averaging 73.22 days between trade completions with a median interval of 62.98 days. This low trade frequency indicates that the algorithm filters out short-term market noise, waiting for high-conviction macro setups before deploying capital. For automated trading agents, this operational pace minimizes exposure to intraday turbulence while concentrating capital in sustained multi-week trends.

Quality of historical results

The strategy demonstrates high payoff quality, highlighted by a profit factor of 6.25 and an average trade return of +11.52% compared to a median trade return of +7.84%. The peak historical performance was marked by a best trade return of +53.32%, while the worst trade yielded -15.52%. A critical indicator of systemic health is the dispersion of returns across trades: the top three winning trades collectively account for 29.48% of total gross profit. This figure confirms that performance is not dependent on a single speculative outlier; rather, profitability is broadly distributed across the 28 winning closed positions. The positive gap between the average trade return (+11.52%) and median trade return (+7.84%) highlights a right-skewed payoff distribution where large upside trends periodic expand the baseline profitability without sacrificing consistency.

Risk, drawdown and losing behavior

Risk containment within the model is evidenced by a maximum historical peak-to-trough drawdown of 15.52%. Notably, this drawdown figure matches the strategy's worst single trade loss of -15.52%, indicating that drawdown events have historically been bound by individual stop-outs or trade exits rather than compound multi-trade equity collapses. The algorithm recorded a longest losing streak of exactly 1 trade, meaning that throughout the entire 6.98-year history, the system never experienced consecutive losing trades. Conversely, the longest winning streak reached 12 consecutive profitable trades. Combined with an 84.85% win rate and a 6.25 profit factor, the loss distribution demonstrates that risk exposure is strictly controlled, allowing automated trading bots operating the logic to recover equity efficiently following negative trade events.

Behavior through time and yearly stability

An analysis of yearly performance figures across the 2020–2026 period reveals broad annual stability. The algorithm achieved positive cumulative net gains in every single calendar year evaluated. In 2020, 3 trades yielded a +59.38% return with a 66.67% win rate. In 2021, 4 trades produced +57.59% (75.00% win rate). Performance accelerated in 2022 with 9 trades generating +106.84% (88.89% win rate). In 2023, 5 out of 5 trades were profitable (100.00% win rate) summing to +46.60%. The year 2024 logged 2 wins out of 2 trades (+11.94%), while 2025 delivered 5 trades (4 wins, 1 loss) for +28.64% (80.00% win rate). In the partial year of 2026 through September, 5 trades produced +69.34% (80.00% win rate). Trade activity varied between 2 and 9 trades per year, reflecting dynamic adaptiveness where signal frequency expands during favorable trend regimes and contracts during choppy markets.

Recent period since 2024-06-01 versus full history

The recent sample window from June 1, 2024, to September 8, 2026, provides valuable insight into the strategy's ongoing efficacy. During this recent window, the strategy completed 11 trades, generating a cumulative return of +102.08%. This accounts for one-third of the total 33 historical trades over the full 6.98-year period, representing a moderate increase in trade density relative to earlier years. The strong return of +102.08% across 11 recent trades confirms that the model's underlying edge has remained active and effective in recent market conditions, showing no sign of structural decay or strategy degradation.

Strengths and limitations

The strategy's principal strengths include an exceptional 84.85% win rate, a strong profit factor of 6.25, a modest 15.52% maximum drawdown, and positive return consistency across every evaluated year. Additionally, gross profits are well distributed, with the top three trades contributing under 30% of total gains. The main limitation lies in the small absolute trade volume of 33 trades over nearly seven years. With an average holding period of ~48.8 days and over two months between trade exits on average, capital remains locked in individual positions for long durations, requiring patience from operators. Furthermore, low sample sizes per year necessitate ongoing statistical validation as additional live trades complete over time.

DevioLab analytical conclusion

With a DevioLab score of 84.92 and a rank of #1 for BG, this 15-minute positional model stands out as a robust quantitative strategy. By marrying granular intraday bar monitoring with multi-week position management, the system filters out short-term market noise while capturing substantial medium-term trends. Its combination of high win rate (84.85%), low drawdown (15.52%), excellent payoff asymmetry, and positive annual returns across seven distinct years provides a compelling foundation for deployment within automated trading environments. Quantitative traders seeking low-frequency, high-conviction systematic models will find this strategy's historical metrics highly representative of effective trend capture.

Data scope and methodology

This analysis is based on historical backtested strategy metrics for BG over the period from September 16, 2019, to September 8, 2026 (6.98 total years). All reported figures, including win rates, trade counts, holding durations, drawdowns, and return percentages, are derived from completed, closed positions executed on a 15-minute bar framework. Performance data reflects simulated backtested results and does not account for live slippage, market impact, or exchange commission schedules. Historical simulated outcomes serve strictly for quantitative evaluation and do not guarantee or predict future trading performance.

完整策略分析