正在加载美国股市状态…
➜
如何开始
只需几分钟即可完成完整系统设置。
打开快速入门指南 →
公开目录 · DEVIOLAB

策略目录

探索算法策略、比较表现,并查看每个模型的完整历史。
每个算法策略都对应一个真实的交易代理(Trading Bot),由 DevioLab 团队基于历史数据测试创建。它可用于受支持平台(包括 Binance)的 API 自动交易,也可仅作为 Signal Bot,通过 Telegram 和电子邮件发送通知。
2 · 代码
⌕
筛选
所有已选条件共同生效
行业与分组筛选
交易所可用性
A · Agilent Technologies Inc. (4) AAOI · Applied Optoelectronics Inc. (5) AAPL · Apple Inc. (7) ABBV · AbbVie Inc. (4) ABNB · Airbnb Inc. (4) ABT · Abbott Laboratories (4) ACGL · Arch Capital Group Ltd. (4) ACN · Accenture PLC Class A (4) ADBE · Adobe Inc. (3) ADI · Analog Devices Inc. (4) ADM · Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (4) ADP · Automatic Data Processing Inc. (4) ADSK · Autodesk Inc. (4) AEE · Ameren Corporation (4) AEP · American Electric Power Company, Inc. (4) AES · The AES Corporation (3) AFL · Aflac Incorporated (4) AIG · American International Group, Inc. (4) AIZ · Assurant Inc. (4) AJG · Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (4) AKAM · Akamai Technologies Inc. (4) ALAB · Astera Labs, Inc. (7) ALB · Albemarle Corporation (4) ALGN · Align Technology Inc. (4) ALL · The Allstate Corporation (4) ALLE · Allegion plc (4) ALNY · Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (4) AMAT · Applied Materials Inc. (7) AMCR · Amcor plc (4) AMD · Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (7) AME · AMETEK, Inc. (4) AMGN · Amgen Inc. (2) AMP · Ameriprise Financial Inc. (4) AMT · American Tower Corporation (4) AMZN · Amazon.com Inc. (7) ANET · Arista Networks Inc. (4) AON · Aon plc Class A (4) AOS · A. O. Smith Corporation (4) APA · APA Corporation (4) APD · Air Products and Chemicals Inc. (4) APH · Amphenol Corp. (4) APO · Apollo Global Management Inc. (4) APP · AppLovin Corporation (4) APTV · Aptiv PLC (4) ARE · Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (4) ARES · Ares Management Corp. (4) ARM · Arm Holdings plc ADR (7) ASML · ASML Holding N.V. NY (7) ASTS · AST SpaceMobile Inc. (6) ATO · Atmos Energy Corporation (4) AVGO · Broadcom Inc. (7) AVY · Avery Dennison Corporation (4) AWK · American Water Works Company, Inc. (4) AXON · Axon Enterprise, Inc. (4) AXP · American Express Company (4) AZO · AutoZone, Inc. (4) BA · Boeing Co/The (4) BABA · Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. ADR (6) BAC · Bank of America Corp. (4) BALL · Ball Corporation (4) BAX · Baxter International Inc. (4) BBY · Best Buy Co., Inc. (4) BDX · Becton, Dickinson and Company (4) BE · Bloom Energy Corp. (5) BEN · Franklin Templeton Inc. (4) BF.B · Brown-Forman Corp. (4) BG · Bunge Global SA (4) BIIB · Biogen Inc. (4) BK · The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (4) BKNG · Booking Holdings Inc. (4) BKR · Baker Hughes Company (4) BLDR · Builders FirstSource Inc. (3) BLK · BlackRock Inc. (4) BMNR · BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (5) BMY · Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (3) BNY · Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (3) BR · Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (4) BRK.B · Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B (4) BRO · Brown & Brown Inc. (4) BSX · Boston Scientific Corp. (3) BX · Blackstone Inc. (4) BXP · BXP, Inc. (4) C · Citigroup Inc. (4) CAH · Cardinal Health Inc. (4) CARR · Carrier Global Corp. (4) CASY · Casey's General Stores, Inc. (4) CAT · Caterpillar Inc. (4) CB · Chubb Limited (4) CBOE · Cboe Global Markets Inc. (4) CBRE · CBRE Group Inc. (4) CCEP · Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (4) CCI · Crown Castle Inc. (4) CCL · Carnival Corporation Ltd. (4) CDNS · Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (4) CDW · CDW Corporation (3) CEG · Constellation Energy Corporation (4) CF · CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (4) CFG · Citizens Financial Group Inc. (4) CHD · Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (4) CHRW · C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. (4) CHTR · Charter Communications Inc. (4) CI · The Cigna Group (4) CIEN · Ciena Corporation (4) CINF · Cincinnati Financial Corporation (3) CL · Colgate-Palmolive Co. (4) CLX · The Clorox Company (4) CMCSA · Comcast Corp. (4) CME · CME Group Inc. (4) CMG · Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (4) CMI · Cummins Inc. (4) CMS · CMS Energy Corporation (3) CNC · Centene Corp. (4) CNP · CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (4) COF · Capital One Financial Corp. (4) COHR · Coherent Corp. (7) COIN · Coinbase Global Inc. (3) COO · The Cooper Companies, Inc. (3) COP · ConocoPhillips (4) COR · Cencora Inc. (4) COST · Costco Wholesale Corporation (4) CPAY · Corpay Inc. (4) CPRT · Copart, Inc. (4) CPT · Camden Property Trust (4) CRCL · Circle Internet Group Inc. (5) CRDO · Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (8) CRH · CRH plc (4) CRL · Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (4) CRM · Salesforce, Inc. (4) CRWD · CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (4) CSCO · Cisco Systems Inc. (4) CSGP · CoStar Group, Inc. (4) CSX · CSX Corporation (4) CTAS · Cintas Corporation (4) CTSH · Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. (3) CTVA · Corteva Inc. (4) DELL · Dell Technologies Inc. (6) EWY · iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (6) FLNC · Fluence Energy, Inc. (7) GS · The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (6) HOOD · Robinhood Markets Inc. (7) IBM · International Business Machines Corporation (6) INTC · Intel Corporation (6) IREN · IREN Limited (7) LITE · Lumentum Holdings Inc. (6) META · Meta Platforms Inc. (7) MRVL · Marvell Technology, Inc. (6) MSFT · Microsoft Corporation (7) MSTR · Strategy Inc. (7) MU · Micron Technology Inc. (7) NFLX · Netflix Inc. (8) NOK · Nokia Corporation Sponsored ADR (7) NVDA · NVIDIA Corporation (7) PLTR · Palantir Technologies Inc. (7) PYPL · PayPal Holdings, Inc. (6) QQQ · Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (6) RKLB · Rocket Lab Corporation (4) SKHY · SK hynix Inc. ADR (3) SMCI · Super Micro Computer Inc. (6) SMH · VanEck Semiconductor ETF (4) SNDK · Sandisk Corp. (4) SOXS · Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (3) SPCX · Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (3) TSLA · Tesla, Inc. (6) TSM · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. ADR (5) USAR · USA Rare Earth, Inc. (3)
所选策略概览

ATO · Atmos Energy Corporation

Stock Universe · 全球股票市场
USD · NYSE · XNYS · United States
ATO 0 +614.33% 1TRAD-WKT6
DevioLab 推荐 · Core 1 iDevioLab 主要推荐:更加防御、平稳且稳定的配置,重点控制风险和回撤。
DevioLab 推荐 · Core 2 iDevioLab 更激进的推荐:接受更高风险和更深回撤,以换取潜在更高回报。
69交易
78.3%胜率
+3.25%平均交易
+30.21%最佳交易
-8.85%最差交易
+131.0%年化
策略分析档案 · 3c39b4aa90ef250c

Quantitative Evaluation of the ATO Algorithmic Trading Strategy: Multi-Week Position Holding and Low Drawdown in Stock Trading Automation

This analytical report evaluates the quantitative performance profile of the core algorithmic trading strategy for ATO stock. Across a comprehensive 7-year historical backtest spanning from September 2019 to September 2026, the strategy achieved a cumulative gain of +614.33% with an annualized return of 130.51%. Operating on a 15-minute intraday execution timeframe, the model exhibits a selective trade selection logic that completed 69 trades in total, delivering an outstanding win rate of 78.26% and a profit factor of 3.75. Notably, the historical data demonstrate structural risk efficiency, evidenced by a modest maximum drawdown of 10.91% and a maximum losing streak of only two consecutive trades. With an average holding duration of nearly 25 days, this strategy provides a robust decision architecture for automated trading bots seeking long-term trend capture while minimizing unnecessary market exposure.

分析日期: 20.09.2026. 策略数据单独更新。
阅读完整分析

Strategy profile

The algorithmic trading strategy designated for ATO stock represents a quantitative framework designed to capture sustained market moves while maintaining strict risk boundaries. Currently holding the top rank on DevioLab for this asset with a DevioLab Score of 83.15, the model is classified as a core strategic architecture. Over a test history covering 7.01 years between September 16, 2019, and September 20, 2026, the system recorded 69 completed trade cycles. During this operational span, the strategy generated a cumulative return of +614.33%, which translates to a calculated annualized performance metric of 130.51%. Although the strategy utilizes 15-minute candlestick charts to monitor market structure and refine entry and exit timing, its low trade frequency underscores a patient, swing-oriented profile rather than an active intraday methodology. Automated trading bots, trading robots, and algorithmic agents executing this logic benefit from the granular 15-minute data stream to identify precise price triggers without engaging in hyperactive turnover.

Trading rhythm and position duration

A detailed examination of trade frequency and holding duration reveals a distinct structural rhythm. Across the entire 7-year dataset, the strategy completed only 69 trades, averaging approximately 9.84 trades per year or 1.19 trades per active month. On average, the system exits a trade once every 36.74 calendar days, with a median spacing between exits of 31.00 days. Furthermore, position duration metrics highlight a commitment to multi-week holding times: the average holding duration stands at 592.36 hours (roughly 24.68 days), while the median holding duration is 477.25 hours (approximately 19.89 days). This disparity between execution frequency (15-minute interval) and trade resolution (multi-week duration) demonstrates that the algorithm utilizes intraday intervals purely for noise reduction and timing precision, leaving capital deployed only when underlying market conditions align with its primary macro parameters.

Quality of historical results

The qualitative distribution of the strategy's closed positions reveals consistent statistical edge and healthy payout symmetry. Out of 69 completed trades, 54 yielded positive results while 15 closed in loss, producing a high overall win rate of 78.26%. The resulting profit factor of 3.75 indicates that total realized gains were nearly four times larger than total realized losses. The strategy's average trade return reached +3.25%, closely aligned with a median trade return of +2.21%, confirming that positive outcomes are systematically distributed across the trade sample rather than driven by extreme statistical noise. While the single best trade achieved an impressive gain of +30.21%, the top three winning positions collectively accounted for 25.74% of total gross profit. This moderate concentration metric demonstrates that while major trend expansions enhance total equity, the system does not rely excessively on rare tail events to maintain its overall profitability.

Risk, drawdown and losing behavior

Risk management metrics across the historical performance period demonstrate substantial capital protection relative to overall return generation. The maximum observed historical peak-to-trough drawdown was limited to 10.92%, an exceptionally controlled figure when evaluated against the cumulative +614.33% total strategy return. On the loss side, the strategy's worst individual trade registered a decline of -8.85%, reflecting effective downside containment. The strategy recorded a maximum consecutive winning streak of 10 trades, whereas its longest consecutive losing streak was restricted to just 2 trades. This combination of a high hit rate (78.26%) and short losing streaks suggests that the strategy rarely remains stuck in persistent adverse market regimes, thereby reducing equity curve volatility and capital degradation during unfavorable market phases.

Behavior through time and yearly stability

An analysis of yearly operational statistics underscores remarkable temporal stability and consistent yearly performance across changing market regimes. In 2019, during the initial fractional year, the strategy closed 1 trade with a 100% win rate for a gain of +2.47%. In 2020, activity scaled to 11 trades with an 72.73% win rate and +39.52% return. Success continued in 2021 (8 trades, 75.00% win rate, +30.58%) and 2022 (8 trades, 62.50% win rate, +29.05%). The system maintained strong momentum into 2023, delivering 12 trades with a 91.67% win rate and +25.82% gain. Performance remained steady in 2024 (12 trades, 75.00% win rate, +29.05%), accelerated in 2025 (10 trades, 80.00% win rate, +45.66%), and recorded 7 trades in 2026 with an 85.71% win rate for +21.88%. Notably, the strategy generated positive cumulative gains in every single calendar year, proving that its quantitative edge is persistent rather than clustered in a single localized bull market.

Recent period since 2024-06-01 versus full history

Evaluating the recent operational window beginning June 1, 2024, provides valuable insight into the modern responsiveness of the algorithm. In this recent window, the strategy completed 26 trades, generating a cumulative return of +92.25%. Comparing these values to the full 7-year sample reveals an increase in trade realization density, as over 37% of total historical trade exits occurred within this recent sub-period. The strong performance output (+92.25%) demonstrates that the strategy's core underlying parameters have remained highly effective under recent market conditions. The consistency between historical and recent metrics confirms that the algorithmic rules governing ATO positions continue to capture structural price movements efficiently without suffering from signal decay.

Strengths and limitations

The primary strength of the ATO algorithmic strategy lies in its combination of a high win rate (78.26%), strong profit factor (3.75), and tight drawdown management (10.92%). The balanced contribution of gross profits across multiple trades prevents vulnerability to sudden single-trade anomalies, while annual positive consistency provides equity curve smoothness. However, several inherent limitations must be recognized. The primary dynamic constraint is trade frequency; completing under 10 trades per year requires substantial patience from automated execution systems and operATOrs. Furthermore, because average holding times exceed 24 days, positions remain exposed to overnight gap risk, macro news events, and corporate announcements over extended periods. Additionally, as backtested results represent idealized closed trade outcomes, live execution metrics may vary based on market spread, liquidity, and broker execution conditions.

DevioLab analytical conclusion

With a DevioLab Score of 83.15 and a rank of #1 for the ATO ticker, this quantitative model stands out as a high-conviction, low-drawdown algorithmic asset allocation strategy. Its ability to extract a cumulative return of +614.33% across 69 trades while limiting maximum drawdown to 10.92% illustrates an favorable risk-adjusted return profile. The strategy is particularly suitable for deployment in automated trading bots and trading agents configured for long-term swing positioning where capital preservation and execution discipline are emphasized over frequent turnover. While historical performance metrics validate the algorithm's structural resilience, ongoing performance monitoring remains essential to verify that future market volatility aligns with the strategy's backtested boundaries.

Data scope and methodology

The analytical conclusions presented in this article are derived strictly from simulated closed historical trade data for asset symbol ATO across the period spanning September 16, 2019, to September 20, 2026. All trade metrics, including total return percentages, trade counts, holding durations, drawdowns, and yearly breakdowns, are calculated from completed orders on 15-minute price history data. This study reflects backtested quantitative research conducted by DevioLab for informational and educational purposes. Historical backtested figures do not include real-world execution costs, dynamic slippage, margin fees, or exchange latency, and past performance is never a guarantee of future live trading results.

完整策略分析