正在加载美国股市状态…
如何开始
只需几分钟即可完成完整系统设置。
打开快速入门指南
公开目录 · DEVIOLAB

策略目录

探索算法策略、比较表现,并查看每个模型的完整历史。
不知道从哪里开始?
1. 目录 2. 选择 Core 1 3. 加入篮子 4. API 密钥 5. 激活交易机器人
我们的建议: 首次配置建议使用 Core 1——这是 DevioLab 的主要、更稳健的筛选。Core 2 适合明确愿意承受更高风险和更深回撤的用户。
i
什么是 Core 1 和 Core 2?
DevioLab 会分析加密货币和股票市场策略,并整理成可直接使用的精选组合,让您无需手动筛选数百种方案。
★ Core 1
由 DevioLab 筛选的加密货币与股票策略组合,作为主要、更均衡且更稳健的起步选择,重点控制风险与回撤。
◆ Core 2
DevioLab 的独立进取型精选,适合明确愿意承受更高风险和更深回撤,以换取潜在更高收益的用户。
AAOI · Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. (5) AAPL · Apple Inc. (7) ALAB · Astera Labs, Inc. (6) AMAT · Applied Materials, Inc. (6) AMD · Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (7) AMZN · Amazon.com, Inc. (6) ARM · Arm Holdings plc (5) ASML · ASML Holding N.V. (7) ASTS · AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (6) AVGO · Broadcom Inc. (6) BABA · Alibaba Group Holding Limited (6) BE · Bloom Energy Corporation (5) BMNR · BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (5) COHR · Coherent Corp. (5) CRCL · Circle Internet Group, Inc. (5) CRDO · Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (8) DELL · Dell Technologies Inc. (6) EWY · iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (6) FLNC · Fluence Energy, Inc. (7) GS · The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (6) HOOD · Robinhood Markets, Inc. (7) IBM · International Business Machines Corporation (6) INTC · Intel Corporation (6) IREN · IREN Limited (7) LITE · Lumentum Holdings Inc. (6) META · Meta Platforms, Inc. (7) MRVL · Marvell Technology, Inc. (6) MSFT · Microsoft Corporation (7) MSTR · Strategy Inc (8) MU · Micron Technology, Inc. (7) NFLX · Netflix, Inc. (7) NOK · Nokia Oyj (7) NVDA · NVIDIA Corporation (7) PLTR · Palantir Technologies Inc. (8) PYPL · PayPal Holdings, Inc. (5) QQQ · Invesco QQQ Trust (6) RKLB · Rocket Lab Corporation (4) SKHY · SK hynix Inc. (3) SMCI · Super Micro Computer, Inc. (5) SMH · VanEck Semiconductor ETF (4) SNDK · Sandisk Corporation (4) SOXS · Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (3) SPCX · Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (3) TSLA · Tesla, Inc. (6) TSM · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (4) USAR · USA Rare Earth, Inc. (4)
所选策略概览

SNDKBUSDT

股票工具 · 通过 Binance 执行
SNDKB 0 +12288.69% 1TRAD-VZA0
DevioLab 推荐 · Core 1 iDevioLab 主要推荐:更加防御、平稳且稳定的配置,重点控制风险和回撤。
DevioLab 推荐 · Core 2 iDevioLab 更激进的推荐:接受更高风险和更深回撤,以换取潜在更高回报。
5交易
100.0%胜率
+1,280.18%平均交易
+6,328.09%最佳交易
+13.60%最差交易
+12,288.7%年化
策略分析档案 · 779efc64152b5402

SNDK Algorithmic Trading Strategy Analysis: High Return Disparity and Micro-Sample Dynamics in Sandisk Corporation

An in-depth quantitative examination of the SNDKB 0 +12288.69% 1TRAD-VZA0 strategy for Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) on the 15-minute timeframe reveals a statistical profile defined by extreme performance asymmetry and a minimal sample size. Evaluated over a 1.49-year historical window from February 24, 2025, to August 21, 2026, the strategy generated a cumulative closed return of 12,288.69% across just 5 total trades. While all 5 executed positions were profitable—yielding a nominal 100% win rate and a maximum drawdown of 0%—the dataset is dominated by a single hyper-outlier trade of 6,328.09%. Consequently, the top three winning positions account for 99.56% of total gross profits. This massive disparity between the average trade return of 1,280.17% and the median trade return of 20.38% demonstrates that the overall statistical return is non-gaussian and heavily reliant on extreme right-tail events. Furthermore, with zero active trades recorded in the post-June 2024 evaluation window and an absent annual distribution log, the strategy demonstrates high historical return concentration coupled with a low statistical sample size, placing its DevioLab performance score at 48.48 and its ticker ranking at third place.

阅读完整分析

Strategy profile

The SNDKB 0 +12288.69% 1TRAD-VZA0 strategy is an algorithmic model deployed on the 15-minute candle interval for Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) under equity market conventions. Across a backtested monitoring window spanning from February 24, 2025, through August 21, 2026—representing approximately 1.49 years of recorded execution history—the model completed a total of 5 trades. Within this historical timeframe, the strategy accumulated a total closed return of 12,288.69%, matching its annualized figure under standard benchmark scaling. DevioLab evaluates this performance with a composite score of 48.48, ranking the strategy 3rd among tested strategies for the SNDK asset symbol. The primary architectural hallmark of this strategy is its extremely low trade execution rate, averaging approximately 3.36 trades per year. Because the dataset consists of only 5 completed sample points, all statistical measures must be interpreted through the lens of micro-sample dynamics, where single operational trades disproportionately skew aggregate metrics.

Trading rhythm and position duration

Trading rhythm for this strategy is characterized by extreme selectivity and prolonged periods of inactivity. Generating an average frequency of 3.36 completed trades per year over a 1.49-year history, the strategy avoids frequent market engagement on its underlying 15-minute execution timeframe. Specific duration metrics—such as average holding hours, median holding hours, average days between exits, and median days between exits—are unrecorded in the primary statistical log. Consequently, while the 15-minute chart provides granular price resolution, the low event frequency indicates that the entry criteria are rarely triggered. The absence of holding time metrics prevents definitive conclusions regarding whether individual position exposures were brief intraday bursts or multi-day position holds. What remains mathematically established is that the strategy operates as a low-frequency, event-driven algorithm rather than a high-turnover model.

Quality of historical results

A detailed examination of trade returns reveals an extreme divergence between central tendency metrics and tail returns. The strategy achieved a perfect historical win rate of 100%, with all 5 closed trades ending in positive territory. The worst individual trade returned positive 13.60%, while the median trade yield stood at 20.38%. However, the arithmetic average trade return reaches an extraordinary 1,280.17%. This dramatic spread between the median (20.38%) and the mean (1,280.17%) highlights a severe positive skewness driven entirely by outliers. Specifically, the single best trade generated a return of 6,328.09%. Profit concentration statistics further illuminate this structural imbalance: the top three winning trades collectively account for 99.56% of total gross profit generated over the historical period. A profit factor of 3.0 is recorded in the system logs. Ultimately, the quality of historical gains is not distributed evenly across trades, but is overwhelmingly reliant on one or two extreme expansion events.

Risk, drawdown and losing behavior

From a risk measurement perspective, the historical backtest records a maximum drawdown of 0.00% and a losing streak of zero, reflecting the fact that zero trades closed at a loss across the 5 executions. The longest winning streak matches the full trade count of 5. While a zero percent drawdown appears ideal on paper, it must be evaluated alongside the sample size of 5 trades. In quantitative analysis, a small sample size cannot reliably prove structural capital protection, as market environments with severe adverse selection may not have been encountered during the 5 active position windows. Furthermore, because no losing trades occurred, traditional downside risk ratios cannot be calculated through standard loss distributions. The principal risk exposed by the statistics is not historical drawdown severity, but statistical instability: with returns so concentrated in three positions, missing a single outlier entry would fundamentally alter the performance profile of the strategy.

Behavior through time and yearly stability

Evaluating temporal stability requires examining how strategy performance is distributed across sequential calendar years. For this dataset, the explicit yearly breakdown table contains no detailed annual entries, leaving the overall 1.49-year span as the primary timeline unit. With total historical trades constrained to 5 between February 2025 and August 2026, there is no evidence of consistent annual yield distribution or steady trade generation across multiple market regimes. The dataset reflects a highly clustered trade pattern rather than a consistent operational rhythm. When yearly breakdowns are empty, quantitative assessment must conclude that historical evidence is insufficient to verify multi-year consistency or seasonal persistence.

Strengths and limitations

The main statistical strength of the strategy is its ability to capture massive upside moves when entries occur, as evidenced by the 6,328.09% best trade and a total historical return of 12,288.69% across 5 winning positions without a recorded losing trade. The maximum recorded drawdown of 0.00% highlights flawless closed-trade execution within the sample. Conversely, the limitations are substantial and central to risk assessment. The total sample size of 5 trades is statistically fragile, preventing high-confidence generalization. Profit concentration is extreme, with 99.56% of total gross gains produced by just three trades. The vast gap between the median trade (20.38%) and the average trade (1,280.17%) demonstrates that typical position outcomes are modest compared to the single extreme outlier. Additionally, the lack of holding duration logs and absent recent trade signals introduce operational uncertainty.

DevioLab analytical conclusion

DevioLab assigns this strategy a composite performance score of 48.48, placing it 3rd among evaluated models for Sandisk Corporation (SNDK). This moderate score reflects the tension between extraordinary top-line profitability and severe statistical limitations. While a total return of 12,288.69% and a 100% win rate are mathematically striking, quantitative evaluation penalizes extreme profit concentration and sample scarcity. Because nearly all accumulated profit stems from a single multi-thousand percent outlier, the strategy overall output is highly vulnerable to timing friction and entry execution. The analytical rating of 48.48 accurately balances the strategy exceptional historic right-tail captures against its unproven statistical robustness over larger sample sizes.

Data scope and methodology

This research document evaluates simulated historical backtest results for the strategy SNDKB 0 +12288.69% 1TRAD-VZA0 on asset symbol SNDK (Sandisk Corporation), executed on a 15-minute timeframe over the dataset period from February 24, 2025, to August 21, 2026 (1.49 years). All cited statistics—including closed trade returns, drawdown figures, trade counts, and concentration ratios—derive strictly from the underlying strategy log. These figures represent historical simulated closed performance and do not reflect live brokerage account results, execution slippage, trading fees, or market impact costs. Historical statistical success provides no guarantee of future operational performance. This analysis is prepared for educational and quantitative research purposes only and does not constitute financial advice or trade recommendations.

完整策略分析