正在加载美国股市状态…
➜
如何开始
只需几分钟即可完成完整系统设置。
打开快速入门指南 →
公开目录 · DEVIOLAB

策略目录

探索算法策略、比较表现,并查看每个模型的完整历史。
每个算法策略都对应一个真实的交易代理(Trading Bot),由 DevioLab 团队基于历史数据测试创建。它可用于受支持平台(包括 Binance)的 API 自动交易,也可仅作为 Signal Bot,通过 Telegram 和电子邮件发送通知。
2 · 代码
⌕
筛选
所有已选条件共同生效
所选策略概览

WLDUSDT

加密市场 · Binance
WLD 215000 +24661.11% 1TRAD-QWX1
DevioLab 推荐 · Core 1 iDevioLab 主要推荐:更加防御、平稳且稳定的配置,重点控制风险和回撤。
DevioLab 推荐 · Core 2 iDevioLab 更激进的推荐:接受更高风险和更深回撤,以换取潜在更高回报。
228交易
78.5%胜率
+2.77%平均交易
+23.93%最佳交易
-22.84%最差交易
+3,774.5%年化
策略分析档案 · 0497241297c0a92c

Quantitative Analysis of WLD 15-Minute Algorithmic Strategy: High-Hit-Rate Execution for WLD Trading Bots

This analytical report evaluates a top-ranked core 15-minute algorithmic trading strategy for WLD on DevioLab. Over a 2.88-year testing window from July 24, 2023, to June 11, 2026, the quantitative model completed 228 trades, achieving a 78.51 percent win rate and a DevioLab Score of 78.48, placing it first overall for the asset. The strategy recorded an all-history aggregate trade return of +24,661.11 percent with a profit factor of 1.67 and a maximum drawdown of 26.51 percent. Characterized by an average holding time of 14.80 hours and a low profit concentration where the top three winning trades generated only 7.03 percent of gross profits, the system demonstrates high statistical consistency across varying market regimes. Out of 228 total closed positions, 149 executed after June 1, 2024, demonstrating robust historical sample density in contemporary crypto market conditions.

分析日期: 06.09.2026. 策略数据单独更新。
阅读完整分析

Strategy profile

The evaluated algorithmic model represents the primary rank-one core quantitative decision engine for WLD on a 15-minute chart timeframe. Designed as execution logic suitable for deployment in automated trading bots, trading robots, and autonomous quantitative trading agents, the strategy operates by capturing short- to medium-term intraday market structural movements in WLD. Across a dataset spanning 2.88 years from July 24, 2023, to June 11, 2026, the algorithm completed 228 total trades. It generated 179 winning outcomes against 49 losing outcomes, translating into a historical win rate of 78.51 percent. The strategy achieved an all-history cumulative sum of closed trade returns equal to +24,661.11 percent, corresponding to an annualized return metric of 3,774.54 percent under compound modeling parameters. With a DevioLab Score of 78.48, this model occupies the top ranking among independent core strategies evaluated for WLD, establishing a quantitative baseline defined by high transaction precision and structured exposure timing.

Trading rhythm and position duration

Analyzing position duration reveals a strategy tailored for intraday structural trades rather than high-frequency scalping or multi-week trend holding. The average holding time per trade stands at 14.80 hours, while the median holding duration is 11.25 hours. Because the median duration is noticeably shorter than the mean, the majority of trades complete within half a day, with a small trailing tail of trades remaining open for up to a full day or slightly longer. In terms of cadence, the system averages 79.07 trades per year, which converts to approximately 7.13 completed trades per active month. The timing between trade exits shows an average inter-trade duration of 4.63 days, with a median of 2.64 days. This statistical spacing confirms that trading agents executing this strategy do not force continuous daily trades. Instead, the logic remains selective, holding open exposure for approximately 11 to 15 hours per trade event, separated by multi-day observation windows while waiting for high-probability setups to form on the 15-minute timeframe.

Quality of historical results

The mathematical structure of trade outcomes displays high stability and exceptional return distribution across completed cycles. The average trade yield across all 228 historical trades is +2.77 percent, whereas the median trade yield is higher at +3.13 percent. In quantitative performance analysis, a median trade that exceeds the average trade signifies that positive performance is heavily supported by typical, mainstream wins rather than being pulled upward by rare, massive tail-end winners. The strategy recorded a single best trade of +23.93 percent and a worst trade of -22.84 percent. A pivotal metric highlighting the structural balance of this model is the gross profit concentration: the top three winning trades accounted for only 7.03 percent of total gross profits. This demonstrates that performance is not dependent on a few isolated windfall trades. Combined with a overall profit factor of 1.67, the historical returns reflect broad-based repeatability generated by high hit frequency across hundreds of separate operational cycles.

Risk, drawdown and losing behavior

Risk metrics demonstrate how the strategy absorbs losses during adverse market periods while maintaining capital growth trajectory. The maximum historical drawdown recorded over the 2.88-year evaluation period was 26.51 percent. Understanding how a 26.51 percent drawdown coexists with a 78.51 percent win rate requires analyzing trade payoff dynamics. While wins occur in nearly four out of five trades, individual losses can occasionally match or exceed single winning trade magnitudes, as indicated by the worst trade loss of -22.84 percent relative to an average trade return of +2.77 percent. However, losing sequences are strictly bounded by the strategy's signal logic. The longest losing streak observed across the entire backtest was just 3 consecutive losses, whereas the longest winning streak extended to 15 consecutive winning trades. This limited loss cluster length prevented severe compounding drawdowns, allowing trading robots to recover peak portfolio values rapidly during subsequent winning series.

Behavior through time and yearly stability

Examining performance across individual calendar years confirms continuous operational viability across different volatility environments in WLD. In 2023, starting from July 24, the strategy closed 34 trades with 24 wins and 10 losses, achieving a 70.59 percent win rate and a sum of trade returns of +95.27 percent. In 2024, trading activity accelerated substantially, generating 127 trades with 104 wins and 23 losses, resulting in an 81.89 percent win rate and an annual sum of +348.42 percent. In 2025, performance remained strong across 62 trades, yielding 48 wins and 14 losses for a 77.42 percent win rate and a cumulative trade sum of +152.49 percent. In the early portion of 2026 up to June 11, the system recorded 5 completed trades with 3 wins and 2 losses, achieving a 60.00 percent win rate and +34.92 percent in trade returns. Positive total yield was sustained across every individual year, showing that the model does not rely on a single isolated market regime.

Recent period since 2024-06-01 versus full history

Analyzing historical performance since June 1, 2024, provides critical perspective on how the strategy adapts to modern market conditions. Out of 228 total historical trades, 149 completed trades occurred with exit dates on or after June 1, 2024. These recent executions accumulated a combined return sum of +414.90 percent. This confirms that over 65 percent of the total sample size was generated during recent market conditions, establishing a robust and recent testing dataset. The average trade yield during this recent window remained aligned with full-history performance, showing no evidence of decay or structural failure. For automated trading agents evaluating modern performance density, the post-June 2024 window provides substantial empirical data verifying sustained trade selection quality in recent market cycles.

Strengths and limitations

A thorough quantitative evaluation reveals distinct analytical trade-offs inherent to this strategy profile. On the strength side, the strategy boasts an exceptional 78.51 percent win rate and an outstanding profit distribution profile, where the top three winning trades account for only 7.03 percent of gross profits. Its top ranking for WLD and short average holding period of 14.80 hours minimize overnight exposure risk while maintaining active market engagement. On the limitation side, the strategy carries a profit factor of 1.67, reflecting that losing trades, though rare, can cut into accumulated gains due to structural asymmetry between average wins and maximum individual loss events. Furthermore, historical drawdowns reached 26.51 percent, requiring capital allocators and automated execution platforms to maintain disciplined risk controls and position sizing models.

DevioLab analytical conclusion

The WLD 15-minute core algorithmic strategy represents a quantitatively sound model characterized by systematic precision and rapid trade rotation. Earning a DevioLab Score of 78.48 and holding the rank-one position for WLD, the model proves that high hit rates (78.51 percent) can be maintained alongside broad profit distribution across multiple years. Its low concentration score ensures that trading returns are derived from repeatable edge rather than unpredictable market anomalies. While risk managers must account for occasional sharp drawdown periods up to 26.51 percent, the short position holding times and short losing streaks (maximum 3 trades) offer an appealing operational balance for automated trading bots and systematic crypto portfolios.

Data scope and methodology

All statistics, performance metrics, holding durations, and trade distributions presented in this analysis originate strictly from backtested simulated trade history for WLD on a 15-minute chart interval between July 24, 2023, and June 11, 2026. Trade performance reflects hypothetical closed positions and does not account for real-time order execution variables, including order book slippage, exchange fee schedules, variable latency, or market impact. Recent period statistics isolate trades with sell timestamps on or after June 1, 2024. Historical backtested performance provides empirical insights into signal behavior but does not guarantee future operational results.