正在加载美国股市状态…
如何开始
只需几分钟即可完成完整系统设置。
打开快速入门指南
公开目录 · DEVIOLAB

策略目录

探索算法策略、比较表现,并查看每个模型的完整历史。
不知道从哪里开始?
1. 目录 2. 选择 Core 1 3. 加入篮子 4. API 密钥 5. 激活交易机器人
我们的建议: 首次配置建议使用 Core 1——这是 DevioLab 的主要、更稳健的筛选。Core 2 适合明确愿意承受更高风险和更深回撤的用户。
i
什么是 Core 1 和 Core 2?
DevioLab 会分析加密货币和股票市场策略,并整理成可直接使用的精选组合,让您无需手动筛选数百种方案。
★ Core 1
由 DevioLab 筛选的加密货币与股票策略组合,作为主要、更均衡且更稳健的起步选择,重点控制风险与回撤。
◆ Core 2
DevioLab 的独立进取型精选,适合明确愿意承受更高风险和更深回撤,以换取潜在更高收益的用户。
所选策略概览

SEIUSDT

加密市场 · Binance
SEI 215000 +23725.15% 1TRAD-QUI4
DevioLab 推荐 · Core 1 iDevioLab 主要推荐:更加防御、平稳且稳定的配置,重点控制风险和回撤。
DevioLab 推荐 · Core 2 iDevioLab 更激进的推荐:接受更高风险和更深回撤,以换取潜在更高回报。
56交易
83.9%胜率
+11.28%平均交易
+46.55%最佳交易
-16.39%最差交易
+2,644.4%年化
策略分析档案 · 16e352d3c0d5215e

Quantitative Analysis of SEI Quantitative Trading Model: High Win-Rate Selectivity on 15-Minute Horizon

This empirical report evaluates the algorithmic trading strategy designated as SEI 215000 +23725.15% 1TRAD-QUI4, applied to SEI in the cryptocurrency market on a 15-minute timeframe. Over a total historical sample of 3.02 years, the model achieved a cumulative simulated profit of 23,725.15% across 56 completed trades, yielding a DevioLab Score of 86.23 and securing the top rank for the asset. The strategy exhibits an exceptional win rate of 83.93% and a profit factor of 6.56, paired with a maximum drawdown of 16.39%. Profit distribution is remarkably balanced, with the top three winning trades accounting for only 18.69% of gross profits. However, the evaluation highlights a significant structural transition: the model recorded zero trades in the window following June 1, 2024, leaving recent market behavior unverified.

阅读完整分析

Strategy profile

The quantitative model SEI 215000 +23725.15% 1TRAD-QUI4 operates on the SEI cryptocurrency asset using a 15-minute chart interval. Within the DevioLab research framework, the strategy holds a core designation and earns a DevioLab Score of 86.23, placing it at rank 1 among evaluated strategies for this specific asset. The evaluation window spans 3.02 years, beginning on August 15, 2023, and concluding on August 21, 2026. Across this multi-year history, the algorithm generated 56 completed trades, producing a cumulative backtested return of 23,725.15% and an annualized performance metric of 2,644.35%. With 47 winning trades against 9 losing trades, the system establishes a strong statistical footprint characterized by selective entry patterns on intraday timeframe data.

Trading rhythm and position duration

Despite operating on a granular 15-minute chart, the strategy exhibits an exceptionally restrained trading pace. Over the 3.02-year evaluation period, the algorithm executed 56 completed trades, which translates to an average trade frequency of 18.56 trades per year, or approximately 1.5 completed trades per month. While specific holding duration statistics such as average holding hours and days between exits are not available in the dataset, the low overall transaction count indicates that the model employs stringent filtering criteria. Rather than engaging in frequent intraday turnover, the strategy remains inactive during the vast majority of 15-minute bars, waiting for specific multi-factor conditions before taking a position. This structural low-frequency approach on a fast chart setting separates the system from conventional high-frequency intraday models.

Quality of historical results

The statistical quality of the strategy's historical performance is driven by a high hit rate paired with healthy trade distribution. Out of 56 total completed trades, 47 were profitable, establishing an 83.93% win rate. The strategy generated a overall profit factor of 6.56, indicating that gross historical gains exceeded gross historical losses by more than sixfold. The average trade return stands at 11.28%, closely aligned with the median trade return of 9.55%. This close proximity between average and median outcomes demonstrates that the strategy's return profile is consistent rather than distorted by extreme positive outliers. Furthermore, the top three winning trades generated only 18.69% of total gross profit, with the single best trade returning 46.55%. This low concentration index confirms that gross profitability was broadly distributed across its 47 winning trades.

Risk, drawdown and losing behavior

Risk management metrics show tight capital preservation relative to total accumulated return. The maximum historical drawdown experienced by the strategy was 16.39%. Notably, the strategy's worst individual trade loss was also -16.39%, indicating that peak historical equity drawdown was primarily determined by a single maximum-loss exit rather than an extended sequence of compounding losing trades. The algorithm recorded a maximum losing streak of only 2 consecutive trades, compared to a maximum winning streak of 10 consecutive trades. Out of 56 positions, only 9 ended in losses. The combination of an 83.93% win rate and a modest 16.39% worst-case drawdown demonstrates effective risk containment during historical backtesting, though losing trades can occasionally reach the full drawdown depth.

Behavior through time and yearly stability

Detailed yearly performance breakdowns are omitted from the available dataset, precluding direct year-by-year statistical comparisons. However, the overarching multi-year metrics offer substantial insight into long-term stability. Generating 56 total trades over 3.02 years implies a steady baseline expectation of approximately 18.56 trades annually. The total compounded growth of 23,725.15% reflects substantial performance during active periods. Because yearly granular metrics are unrecorded, it cannot be confirmed whether returns were uniformly distributed across calendar years or concentrated during specific volatility regimes in the crypto market. Nevertheless, the broad distribution of profits across 47 winning trades suggests that performance was built over multiple successful setups rather than a short-lived anomaly.

Strengths and limitations

The primary analytical strengths of this strategy include an exceptional win rate of 83.93%, a strong profit factor of 6.56, and a well-distributed profit profile where the top three winning trades account for less than 19% of gross gains. The maximum drawdown of 16.39% is exceptionally mild relative to the 23,725.15% cumulative simulated return. Conversely, notable limitations include a modest total sample size of 56 completed trades over 3.02 years, a complete absence of trades since June 1, 2024, and the lack of explicit position duration data. Additionally, because worst single trade loss matches maximum drawdown, individual adverse trades can inflict immediate impact on strategy equity.

DevioLab analytical conclusion

With a DevioLab Score of 86.23 and the rank 1 position for SEI, this quantitative strategy represents a highly refined, low-frequency signal model on an intraday timeframe. Its core statistical profile combines high accuracy with low profit concentration, achieving strong historical trade mechanics. However, prospective evaluation must weigh these historical strengths against the post-June 2024 trading drought. The total sample of 56 trades provides a clear historical signature, but the absence of recent execution mandates careful observation before concluding that past historical efficiency will persist unchanged under current market regimes.

Data scope and methodology

All statistics in this report are derived directly from backtested strategy execution data covering the period from August 15, 2023, to August 21, 2026, on the SEI asset using 15-minute price history. The trade metrics describe historical simulated closed trades and do not represent actual live brokerage account balances, execution fills, or guaranteed future performance. Real-world implementation may experience performance variations due to slippage, exchange commission structures, order book liquidity constraints, and execution latency. This analysis is provided strictly for quantitative research and analytical purposes and does not constitute financial or investment advice.