正在加载美国股市状态…
如何开始
只需几分钟即可完成完整系统设置。
打开快速入门指南
公开目录 · DEVIOLAB

策略目录

探索算法策略、比较表现,并查看每个模型的完整历史。
不知道从哪里开始?
1. 目录 2. 选择 Core 1 3. 加入篮子 4. API 密钥 5. 激活交易机器人
我们的建议: 首次配置建议使用 Core 1——这是 DevioLab 的主要、更稳健的筛选。Core 2 适合明确愿意承受更高风险和更深回撤的用户。
i
什么是 Core 1 和 Core 2?
DevioLab 会分析加密货币和股票市场策略,并整理成可直接使用的精选组合,让您无需手动筛选数百种方案。
★ Core 1
由 DevioLab 筛选的加密货币与股票策略组合,作为主要、更均衡且更稳健的起步选择,重点控制风险与回撤。
◆ Core 2
DevioLab 的独立进取型精选,适合明确愿意承受更高风险和更深回撤,以换取潜在更高收益的用户。
所选策略概览

AIUSDT

加密市场 · Binance
AI 215000 +8577.11% 1TRAD-MHI5
DevioLab 推荐 · Core 1 iDevioLab 主要推荐:更加防御、平稳且稳定的配置,重点控制风险和回撤。
52交易
88.5%胜率
+10.51%平均交易
+91.47%最佳交易
-44.28%最差交易
+1,412.8%年化
策略分析档案 · 2ad06b87dcc4fe96

AI · AI Strategy Analysis: Evaluating the 15-Minute Swing System Ranked Number One on DevioLab

An in-depth quantitative examination of the AI 215000 +8577.11% 1TRAD-MHI5 trading strategy on AI · AI. Operating across a 1.78-year backtested history on a 15-minute chart, this core strategy achieves a DevioLab score of 71.61 and ranks first for the asset. Despite utilizing a low-timeframe candle chart, the strategy displays distinct multi-day swing trading characteristics, averaging 83.13 holding hours per position. With an 88.46% win rate across 52 completed trades and a profit factor of 3.33, performance is driven by remarkable symmetry between average (+10.51%) and median (+10.60%) trade returns. This research paper breaks down the structural relationship between holding durations, profit concentration, annual stability, and drawdown risk.

阅读完整分析

Strategy profile

The quantitative strategy designated AI 215000 +8577.11% 1TRAD-MHI5 is a core systematic trading model developed for AI · AI within the cryptocurrency market. Operating on a 15-minute candle interval, the system has logged a complete history spanning 1.78 years from January 4, 2024, through October 15, 2025. Over this observation window, the strategy generated 52 completed trades, achieving a DevioLab score of 71.61. This score places the model in the top rank for AI · AI assets evaluated on the platform. From a top-level performance perspective, the strategy closed 46 winning trades against 6 losing trades, yielding an exceptionally high historical win rate of 88.46%. The cumulative sum of trade returns across all completed positions reaches +8,577.11%, translating to an annualized return metric of +1,412.82%. The strategy recorded a profit factor of 3.33, demonstrating a substantial reward-to-risk multiplier across its trade distribution. While these metrics establish a strong performance baseline, understanding how the strategy operates requires analyzing its position execution timing, drawdown profile, and return distribution.

Trading rhythm and position duration

Although the strategy operates on a 15-minute candlestick chart, its execution pacing is decisively characteristic of multi-day swing trading rather than high-frequency scalping. The average position holding time is 83.13 hours (approximately 3.46 days), while the median holding duration stands at 64.50 hours (roughly 2.69 days). The moderate gap between mean and median holding times indicates that while most trades conclude within two to three days, selected positions extend across several days to allow move progression. This deliberate, extended holding period is matched by a selective trade frequency. The strategy completes an average of 29.20 trades per year, which corresponds to approximately 2.74 trades per active month. Furthermore, the average time between consecutive trade exits is 12.69 days, with a median exit spacing of 8.13 days. These metrics reveal that the 15-minute timeframe is not utilized to generate rapid intraday turnover, but rather to refine entry and exit execution timing for longer swing setups. The strategy spends extended intervals in cash or holding active positions, maintaining a low trade frequency that minimizes exposure to constant market noise.

Quality of historical results

Evaluating the structural distribution of returns reveals notable symmetry across winning trades. The average trade return across all 52 positions is +10.51%, closely aligning with the median trade return of +10.60%. In quantitative backtesting, close alignment between mean and median expectations is a hallmark of structural reliability. It confirms that total strategy return is driven by repeated, consistent positive trade outcomes rather than being artificially inflated by a solitary, extreme outlier. Further evidence of robust return distribution is found in the profit concentration metrics. The top three winning trades account for 26.05% of total gross profit. While the best single trade achieved an impressive gain of +91.47%, the remaining 73.95% of gross profit was distributed broadly across the other 43 winning trades. Combined with a profit factor of 3.33, the data indicate that the strategy's high hit rate is paired with a healthy payoff ratio, establishing a broad-based historical profit engine across diverse market regimes.

Risk, drawdown and losing behavior

A rigorous examination of risk metrics highlights a key structural tension between loss frequency and loss severity. On one hand, the strategy demonstrates extraordinary streak consistency: its longest historical winning streak reached 11 consecutive trades, whereas its longest losing streak was capped at just 1 trade. Across 52 closed trades, the system never experienced back-to-back losing positions, reflecting high directional precision. On the other hand, the maximum equity drawdown recorded over the 1.78-year period stands at 44.28%. Crucially, this maximum drawdown figure matches the worst single trade loss of -44.28% almost exactly. This statistical alignment reveals that historical drawdown risk was not caused by an extended cluster of compounding losses, but rather by a single, severe adverse trade event. Consequently, while the strategy loses infrequently, the risk profile is dominated by asymmetric tail risk in individual losing trades, underscoring the importance of strict position sizing and stop-loss discipline.

Behavior through time and yearly stability

Analyzing annual performance metrics illustrates strong operational consistency across distinct calendar periods. In 2024, the strategy executed 38 trades, securing 34 wins and 4 losses for an 89.47% win rate and a cumulative trade sum of +374.05%. In 2025 (covering the period through October 15), the strategy completed 14 trades, recording 12 wins and 2 losses for an 85.71% win rate and a cumulative trade sum of +172.23%. Comparing these annual windows demonstrates that the strategy's operational pacing and efficiency remained remarkably stable. Trade frequency averaged approximately 3.17 trades per month in 2024 and 1.47 trades per month in 2025, while win rates remained tightly anchored within the 85% to 90% range. Rather than relying on a short burst of extreme performance, the strategy sustained its high win rate and positive return generation across changing market environments throughout both years.

Recent period since 2024-06-01 versus full history

The sample window starting June 1, 2024, provides a dedicated perspective on recent performance dynamics. Since June 1, 2024, the strategy executed 36 completed trades, generating a cumulative trade sum of +342.56%. This recent dataset represents 69.23% of all total historical trades logged by the strategy since its inception in early January 2024. Comparing the recent window against the full history confirms that strategy activity has not decayed over time. The win rate and return pacing during this recent sample closely match the overall historical baselines. With 36 completed trades over a 16.5-month window, the recent dataset offers a statistically robust confirmation that the strategy's edge has remained intact through recent market cycles, rather than relying solely on early backtest historical gains.

Strengths and limitations

The primary strength of the AI 215000 +8577.11% 1TRAD-MHI5 strategy lies in its combination of an exceptionally high win rate (88.46%) and consistent trade expectation, demonstrated by the near-identical mean (+10.51%) and median (+10.60%) trade returns. The strategy exhibits low profit concentration, with 73.95% of gross profits originating outside the top three trades, alongside a profit factor of 3.33 and a maximum losing streak of only 1 trade. The principal limitation of the strategy is its single-trade tail risk. The maximum drawdown of 44.28% mirrors the worst single trade (-44.28%), indicating that an unexpected market gap or severe adverse move can inflict significant damage in a single position. Additionally, with an average holding time of 83.13 hours and a total sample size of 52 trades, the system requires patience, as exit signals occur infrequently, averaging 12.69 days apart.

DevioLab analytical conclusion

With a DevioLab score of 71.61 and a rank of number one for AI · AI, this trading model represents a highly effective systematic approach to swing trading the cryptocurrency asset. The quantitative structure successfully leverages a 15-minute execution frame to capture multi-day trends, balancing a low overall trade count with high trade accuracy and consistent profitability. From a portfolio risk management standpoint, potential operators must evaluate the tradeoff between high hit rates and single-trade drawdown magnitude. While the strategy historically avoids multi-trade losing streaks, managing the risk of isolated large adverse trade events remains paramount. Overall, the empirical statistics paint a picture of a disciplined, high-expectation systematic strategy with strong recent and historical stability.

Data scope and methodology

This analysis is based entirely on historical backtested performance data recorded for strategy AI 215000 +8577.11% 1TRAD-MHI5 on the AI/USDT currency pair from January 4, 2024, to October 15, 2025. The dataset comprises 52 completed trades generated on a 15-minute timeframe. Recent period calculations evaluate trades closed on or after June 1, 2024 UTC. All return figures, profit factors, holding durations, and drawdown percentages reflect closed-trade statistical simulations. These figures do not account for live exchange execution slippage, variable order book liquidity, or trading fees, and do not represent actual Binance account performance. Historical backtested results are provided strictly for research purposes and do not guarantee or predict future performance.