Carregando o status do mercado de ações dos EUA…
➜
COMO COMEÇAR
Conclua toda a configuração do sistema em poucos minutos.
Abrir guia de início rápido →
Catálogo público · DEVIOLAB

ESTRATÉGIAS E BOTS DE TRADING

Escolha uma estratégia de trading e ative um bot que negocie automaticamente conforme suas regras.
Uma estratégia define as regras de compra e venda. Um bot de trading executa essas regras pela API de uma exchange compatível. Você também pode usar a estratégia escolhida como bot de sinais com notificações por Telegram e email.
FILTROS
Escolha Core 1 para um início equilibrado, selecione uma exchange para negociar e encontre o ticker desejado. Os filtros funcionam juntos.
Filtros de setores e grupos
Exchange de negociação?Mostra instrumentos disponíveis para negociação SPOT contra USDT conforme a última normalização. Clique novamente na exchange selecionada para mostrar todas.
A · Agilent Technologies Inc. (4) AAOI · Applied Optoelectronics Inc. (5) AAPL · Apple Inc. (7) ABBV · AbbVie Inc. (4) ABNB · Airbnb Inc. (4) ABT · Abbott Laboratories (4) ACGL · Arch Capital Group Ltd. (4) ACN · Accenture PLC Class A (4) ADBE · Adobe Inc. (3) ADI · Analog Devices Inc. (4) ADM · Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (4) ADP · Automatic Data Processing Inc. (4) ADSK · Autodesk Inc. (4) AEE · Ameren Corporation (4) AEP · American Electric Power Company, Inc. (4) AES · The AES Corporation (3) AFL · Aflac Incorporated (4) AIG · American International Group, Inc. (4) AIZ · Assurant Inc. (4) AJG · Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (4) AKAM · Akamai Technologies Inc. (4) ALAB · Astera Labs, Inc. (7) ALB · Albemarle Corporation (4) ALGN · Align Technology Inc. (4) ALL · The Allstate Corporation (4) ALLE · Allegion plc (4) ALNY · Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (4) AMAT · Applied Materials Inc. (7) AMCR · Amcor plc (4) AMD · Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (7) AME · AMETEK, Inc. (4) AMGN · Amgen Inc. (2) AMP · Ameriprise Financial Inc. (4) AMT · American Tower Corporation (4) AMZN · Amazon.com Inc. (7) ANET · Arista Networks Inc. (4) AON · Aon plc Class A (4) AOS · A. O. Smith Corporation (4) APA · APA Corporation (4) APD · Air Products and Chemicals Inc. (4) APH · Amphenol Corp. (4) APO · Apollo Global Management Inc. (4) APP · AppLovin Corporation (4) APTV · Aptiv PLC (4) ARE · Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (4) ARES · Ares Management Corp. (4) ARM · Arm Holdings plc ADR (7) ASML · ASML Holding N.V. NY (7) ASTS · AST SpaceMobile Inc. (6) ATO · Atmos Energy Corporation (4) AVGO · Broadcom Inc. (7) AVY · Avery Dennison Corporation (4) AWK · American Water Works Company, Inc. (4) AXON · Axon Enterprise, Inc. (4) AXP · American Express Company (4) AZO · AutoZone, Inc. (4) BA · Boeing Co/The (4) BABA · Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. ADR (6) BAC · Bank of America Corp. (4) BALL · Ball Corporation (4) BAX · Baxter International Inc. (4) BBY · Best Buy Co., Inc. (4) BDX · Becton, Dickinson and Company (4) BE · Bloom Energy Corp. (5) BEN · Franklin Templeton Inc. (4) BF.B · Brown-Forman Corp. (4) BG · Bunge Global SA (4) BIIB · Biogen Inc. (3) BK · The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (4) BKNG · Booking Holdings Inc. (4) BKR · Baker Hughes Company (4) BLDR · Builders FirstSource Inc. (3) BLK · BlackRock Inc. (4) BMNR · BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (5) BMY · Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (3) BNY · Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (4) BR · Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (4) BRK.B · Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B (4) BRO · Brown & Brown Inc. (4) BSX · Boston Scientific Corp. (3) BX · Blackstone Inc. (4) BXP · BXP, Inc. (4) C · Citigroup Inc. (4) CAH · Cardinal Health Inc. (4) CARR · Carrier Global Corp. (4) CASY · Casey's General Stores, Inc. (4) CAT · Caterpillar Inc. (4) CB · Chubb Limited (4) CBOE · Cboe Global Markets Inc. (4) CBRE · CBRE Group Inc. (4) CCEP · Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (4) CCI · Crown Castle Inc. (4) CCL · Carnival Corporation Ltd. (4) CDNS · Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (4) CDW · CDW Corporation (3) CEG · Constellation Energy Corporation (4) CF · CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (4) CFG · Citizens Financial Group Inc. (4) CHD · Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (4) CHRW · C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. (4) CHTR · Charter Communications Inc. (4) CI · The Cigna Group (4) CIEN · Ciena Corporation (4) CINF · Cincinnati Financial Corporation (3) CL · Colgate-Palmolive Co. (4) CLX · The Clorox Company (4) CMCSA · Comcast Corp. (4) CME · CME Group Inc. (4) CMG · Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (4) CMI · Cummins Inc. (4) CMS · CMS Energy Corporation (3) CNC · Centene Corp. (4) CNP · CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (4) COF · Capital One Financial Corp. (4) COHR · Coherent Corp. (7) COIN · Coinbase Global Inc. (3) COO · The Cooper Companies, Inc. (4) COP · ConocoPhillips (4) COR · Cencora Inc. (4) COST · Costco Wholesale Corporation (4) CPAY · Corpay Inc. (4) CPRT · Copart, Inc. (4) CPT · Camden Property Trust (4) CRCL · Circle Internet Group Inc. (5) CRDO · Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (8) CRH · CRH plc (4) CRL · Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (4) CRM · Salesforce, Inc. (4) CRWD · CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (4) CSCO · Cisco Systems Inc. (4) CSGP · CoStar Group, Inc. (4) CSX · CSX Corporation (4) CTAS · Cintas Corporation (4) CTSH · Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. (3) CTVA · Corteva Inc. (3) CVNA · Carvana Co. (4) CVS · CVS Health Corporation (4) CVX · Chevron Corp. (4) D · Dominion Energy, Inc. (4) DAL · Delta Air Lines, Inc. (4) DASH · DoorDash, Inc. (4) DD · DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (4) DDOG · Datadog Inc. Class A (4) DE · Deere & Company (4) DECK · Deckers Outdoor Corporation (4) DELL · Dell Technologies Inc. (7) DG · Dollar General Corp. (4) DGX · Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (4) DHI · D.R. Horton, Inc. (4) DHR · Danaher Corp. (4) DIS · The Walt Disney Company (4) DLR · Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (4) DLTR · Dollar Tree Inc. (4) DOC · Healthpeak Properties, Inc. (4) DOV · Dover Corporation (4) DOW · Dow Inc. (4) DPZ · Domino's Pizza, Inc. (4) DRI · Darden Restaurants, Inc. (4) DTE · DTE Energy Company (4) DUK · Duke Energy Corporation (4) DVA · DaVita Inc. (4) DVN · Devon Energy Corporation (4) DXCM · DexCom Inc. (4) EBAY · eBay Inc. (4) ECHO · EchoStar Corp. (4) ECL · Ecolab Inc. (4) ED · Consolidated Edison Inc. (4) EFX · Equifax Inc. (4) EG · Everest Group, Ltd. (4) EIX · Edison International (4) EL · The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (4) ELV · Elevance Health, Inc. (4) EME · EMCOR Group, Inc. (4) EMR · Emerson Electric Co. (4) EOG · EOG Resources, Inc. (4) EQIX · Equinix, Inc. (4) ERIE · Erie Indemnity Company (4) EWY · iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (6) FLNC · Fluence Energy, Inc. (7) GS · The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (6) HOOD · Robinhood Markets Inc. (7) IBM · International Business Machines Corporation (6) INTC · Intel Corporation (6) IREN · IREN Limited (6) LITE · Lumentum Holdings Inc. (5) META · Meta Platforms Inc. (6) MRVL · Marvell Technology, Inc. (6) MSFT · Microsoft Corporation (7) MSTR · Strategy Inc. (7) MU · Micron Technology Inc. (7) NFLX · Netflix Inc. (8) NOK · Nokia Corporation Sponsored ADR (6) NVDA · NVIDIA Corporation (7) PLTR · Palantir Technologies Inc. (8) PYPL · PayPal Holdings, Inc. (6) QQQ · Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (6) RKLB · Rocket Lab Corporation (4) SKHY · SK hynix Inc. ADR (3) SMCI · Super Micro Computer Inc. (5) SMH · VanEck Semiconductor ETF (4) SNDK · Sandisk Corp. (4) SOXS · Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (3) SPCX · Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (3) TSLA · Tesla, Inc. (6) TSM · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. ADR (4) USAR · USA Rare Earth, Inc. (2)
Visão geral da estratégia selecionada

EFX · Equifax Inc.

Stock Universe · mercado global de ações
USD · NYSE · XNYS · United States
EFX 0 +2493.42% 1TRAD-USO6
Recomendado pela DevioLab · Core 1 iCada ticker — um par de criptomoedas ou uma ação/ETF — pode ter várias estratégias com frequências de negociação e níveis de risco diferentes. Core 1 é a seleção principal e mais equilibrada da DevioLab para esse ticker: o sistema prioriza o controle de risco e drawdown. É a opção inicial preferida. Você também pode escolher uma estratégia mais conservadora ou agressiva comparando suas operações e gráficos abaixo.
Recomendado pela DevioLab · Core 2 iCore 2 é a seleção mais dinâmica e agressiva da DevioLab para um ticker. Aceita mais risco e drawdowns mais profundos em troca de retornos potencialmente maiores. Compare as operações e gráficos das diferentes estratégias abaixo e escolha o perfil adequado.
54Operações
75.9%Taxa de acerto
+6.83%Operação média
+47.39%Melhor operação
-8.65%Pior operação
+67.1%Anualizado
Perfil analítico da estratégia · 1ed9817c3a13f5dc

EFX · EFX Algorithmic Strategy Analysis: High Win-Rate Model Achieves 6.25 Profit Factor Across Multi-Week Holding Horizons

This quantitative evaluation analyzes the historical backtest performance of the top-ranked algorithmic trading strategy for EFX (EFX) on the 15-minute chart, covering nearly seven years of data from September 2019 to August 2026. Designed as an automated decision mechanism suitable for algorithmic trading bots and autonomous agents, the strategy achieves a 75.93% win rate and an exceptional Profit Factor of 6.25 across 54 closed trades. By pairing selective entries with extended position durations averaging over 22 days, the system generated a cumulative return of +2493.42% while capping maximum drawdown at an unusually mild 8.65%. The analysis evaluates position duration, historical profit distribution, risk metrics, and recent execution since mid-2024.

Análise em 23.10.2026. Os dados da estratégia são atualizados separadamente.
Ler análise completa

1. Strategy profile

The strategy analyzed in this report represents the primary algorithmic quantitative model for EFX stock on the 15-minute bar frequency, recorded under DevioLab selection logic as the top-ranked core strategy for the ticker with a DevioLab Score of 86.00. Evaluated across a dataset spanning September 16, 2019, through August 7, 2026—a duration of 6.89 years—the system completed 54 trade cycles. Across this history, it secured 41 winning trades against 13 losses, producing a win rate of 75.93%. The strategy's aggregate cumulative gain reached +2493.42%, translating to an annualized return metric of 67.05%. Developed to function as the core decision-making script for automated trading bots and execution agents, the framework filters price noise on short intraday timeframes to isolate high-probability structural swings in EFX, balancing high directional accuracy with stringent risk boundaries.

2. Trading rhythm and position duration

Although the decision logic operates on a 15-minute chart resolution, the structural cadence of the strategy is decidedly macro-oriented rather than high-frequency. The model executes an average of 7.83 trades per year, or approximately 1.15 trades per active month, establishing a highly selective operational pace. Position holding periods reflect a multi-week commitment: average holding time stands at 537.74 hours (roughly 22.4 days), while median holding duration is 358.13 hours (approximately 14.9 days). Exits occur infrequently, with an average interval between closed trades of 44.66 days and a median spacing of 33.70 days. This statistical profile demonstrates that while 15-minute candle data are utilized for entry precision, automated trading robots executing this logic remain exposed to directional market trend lines over multi-week horizons, avoiding over-trading and short-term whipsaws.

3. Quality of historical results

The overall return profile exhibits robust quality characteristics driven by favorable reward-to-risk asymmetry and consistent baseline performance. The average return per completed trade is +6.83%, while the median trade yield is +4.62%, indicating that positive expectancy is not dependent on extreme speculative spikes. The strategy achieved a Profit Factor of 6.25, meaning gross profits exceeded gross losses by more than sixfold. Additionally, the strategy's peak winner gained +47.39%, while the worst single trade closed at -8.65%. A crucial measure of structural health is winner concentration: the top three trades accounted for 25.81% of total gross profit. Because nearly three-quarters of gross profit was distributed across the remaining 38 winning trades, the historical outcome demonstrates broad-based stability rather than fragile dependency on a handful of lucky outliers.

4. Risk, drawdown and losing behavior

Risk containment is one of the strategy's most prominent analytical features. Across the entire 6.89-year execution record, the maximum drawdown reached only 8.65%, matching the depth of its single worst closed loss (-8.65%). This alignment between maximum single-trade loss and total peak-to-trough equity decline points to effective risk-capping mechanisms. Consecutive losing sequences were minimal, with the longest losing streak limited to 2 trades, whereas the longest winning streak extended to 8 consecutive positive trades. The high win rate of 75.93% combined with constrained single-trade losses provides a comfortable psychological and mathematical margin for automated trading agents, preventing deep capital impairment even during adverse market conditions.

5. Behavior through time and yearly stability

An examination of annual performance shows remarkable year-over-year consistency across varying equity market environments. In 2020, the model completed 7 trades with an 85.71% win rate, yielding +89.60%. The following year, 2021, generated 5 trades with a perfect 100% win rate and a combined return of +67.92%. Performance remained positive through challenging macro conditions in 2022 (7 trades, 71.43% win rate, +45.53% sum) and 2023 (8 trades, 75.00% win rate, +79.95% sum). In 2024, trade activity increased to 11 closed trades (72.73% win rate, +40.36% sum). The strategy experienced a temporary consolidation in 2025, recording 8 trades with a 50.00% win rate and a modest net gain of +8.05%, before rebounding strongly in 2026 with 8 trades, an 87.50% win rate, and +37.44% in net returns. This unbroken multi-year sequence of positive annual net returns reinforces the structural durability of the underlying logic.

6. Recent period since 2024-06-01 versus full history

Evaluating recent trade history from June 1, 2024, to August 7, 2026, provides insight into current model efficacy. During this recent window, 22 trades were completed, generating a cumulative return sum of +56.88%. This subset accounts for nearly 41% of all historical trades recorded since 2019, reflecting an increase in qualifying trade setups in recent market cycles. The average trade yield during this recent phase was approximately +2.59%, which sits below the full-history average of +6.83%. However, the consistent accumulation of positive gains across 22 executions demonstrates that automated trading bots utilizing this script continued to generate positive statistical edge without experiencing elevated drawdown.

7. Strengths and limitations

The primary strength of this algorithmic model lies in its exceptional Profit Factor (6.25), robust win rate (75.93%), and low peak drawdown (8.65%), complemented by a broad profit distribution where the top 3 winners represent only 25.81% of gains. The extended position duration (median ~14.9 days) shields the model from micro-slippage and execution noise. Conversely, the strategy's primary limitation stems from its low sample size: 54 completed trades over nearly seven years translates to roughly 7.8 trades annually. Traders deploying this logic via autonomous trading agents must exercise patience, as long intervals between trades (averaging 44.66 days) require extended periods of capital inactivity and disciplined resistance to manual intervention.

8. DevioLab analytical conclusion

The quantitative profile of this EFX strategy demonstrates how lower trade frequency can be leveraged to capture significant equity appreciation while suppressing portfolio volatility. Achieving a total backtested yield of +2493.42% with a peak drawdown under 9% places this system in an elite performance tier among equity-focused automated strategies on DevioLab. The strategy is well-suited for automated trading bots designed for medium-term position trading where minimizing turnover and capping downside exposure take precedence over high-frequency activity. While historical metrics do not guarantee future outcomes, the consistency displayed across distinct market regimes from 2019 through 2026 validates the statistical robustness of the model.

9. Data scope and methodology

The statistics analyzed in this document are derived exclusively from historical simulated trade logs generated for asset symbol EFX on 15-minute price history from September 16, 2019, through August 7, 2026. All trade metrics—including win rates, holding durations, yearly breakdowns, and recent performance totals—are computed based on closed trade events. This research is intended solely for educational and quantitative analysis contexts regarding automated decision rules for trading agents and trading robots. It does not reflect live execution slippage, broker fees, or capital management constraints, and must not be construed as financial or investment advice.

Análise completa da estratégia