Carregando o status do mercado de ações dos EUA…
➜
COMO COMEÇAR
Conclua toda a configuração do sistema em poucos minutos.
Abrir guia de início rápido →
Catálogo público · DEVIOLAB

ESTRATÉGIAS E BOTS DE TRADING

Escolha uma estratégia de trading e ative um bot que negocie automaticamente conforme suas regras.
Uma estratégia define as regras de compra e venda. Um bot de trading executa essas regras pela API de uma exchange compatível. Você também pode usar a estratégia escolhida como bot de sinais com notificações por Telegram e email.
FILTROS
Escolha Core 1 para um início equilibrado, selecione uma exchange para negociar e encontre o ticker desejado. Os filtros funcionam juntos.
Filtros de setores e grupos
Exchange de negociação?Mostra instrumentos disponíveis para negociação SPOT contra USDT conforme a última normalização. Clique novamente na exchange selecionada para mostrar todas.
A · Agilent Technologies Inc. (4) AAOI · Applied Optoelectronics Inc. (5) AAPL · Apple Inc. (7) ABBV · AbbVie Inc. (4) ABNB · Airbnb Inc. (4) ABT · Abbott Laboratories (4) ACGL · Arch Capital Group Ltd. (4) ACN · Accenture PLC Class A (4) ADBE · Adobe Inc. (3) ADI · Analog Devices Inc. (4) ADM · Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (4) ADP · Automatic Data Processing Inc. (4) ADSK · Autodesk Inc. (4) AEE · Ameren Corporation (4) AEP · American Electric Power Company, Inc. (4) AES · The AES Corporation (3) AFL · Aflac Incorporated (4) AIG · American International Group, Inc. (4) AIZ · Assurant Inc. (4) AJG · Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (4) AKAM · Akamai Technologies Inc. (4) ALAB · Astera Labs, Inc. (7) ALB · Albemarle Corporation (4) ALGN · Align Technology Inc. (4) ALL · The Allstate Corporation (4) ALLE · Allegion plc (4) ALNY · Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (4) AMAT · Applied Materials Inc. (7) AMCR · Amcor plc (4) AMD · Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (7) AME · AMETEK, Inc. (4) AMGN · Amgen Inc. (2) AMP · Ameriprise Financial Inc. (4) AMT · American Tower Corporation (4) AMZN · Amazon.com Inc. (7) ANET · Arista Networks Inc. (4) AON · Aon plc Class A (4) AOS · A. O. Smith Corporation (4) APA · APA Corporation (4) APD · Air Products and Chemicals Inc. (4) APH · Amphenol Corp. (4) APO · Apollo Global Management Inc. (4) APP · AppLovin Corporation (4) APTV · Aptiv PLC (4) ARE · Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (4) ARES · Ares Management Corp. (4) ARM · Arm Holdings plc ADR (7) ASML · ASML Holding N.V. NY (7) ASTS · AST SpaceMobile Inc. (6) ATO · Atmos Energy Corporation (4) AVGO · Broadcom Inc. (7) AVY · Avery Dennison Corporation (4) AWK · American Water Works Company, Inc. (4) AXON · Axon Enterprise, Inc. (4) AXP · American Express Company (4) AZO · AutoZone, Inc. (4) BA · Boeing Co/The (4) BABA · Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. ADR (6) BAC · Bank of America Corp. (4) BALL · Ball Corporation (4) BAX · Baxter International Inc. (4) BBY · Best Buy Co., Inc. (4) BDX · Becton, Dickinson and Company (4) BE · Bloom Energy Corp. (5) BEN · Franklin Templeton Inc. (4) BF.B · Brown-Forman Corp. (4) BG · Bunge Global SA (4) BIIB · Biogen Inc. (3) BK · The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (4) BKNG · Booking Holdings Inc. (4) BKR · Baker Hughes Company (4) BLDR · Builders FirstSource Inc. (3) BLK · BlackRock Inc. (4) BMNR · BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (5) BMY · Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (3) BNY · Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (4) BR · Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (4) BRK.B · Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B (4) BRO · Brown & Brown Inc. (4) BSX · Boston Scientific Corp. (3) BX · Blackstone Inc. (4) BXP · BXP, Inc. (4) C · Citigroup Inc. (4) CAH · Cardinal Health Inc. (4) CARR · Carrier Global Corp. (4) CASY · Casey's General Stores, Inc. (4) CAT · Caterpillar Inc. (4) CB · Chubb Limited (4) CBOE · Cboe Global Markets Inc. (4) CBRE · CBRE Group Inc. (4) CCEP · Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (4) CCI · Crown Castle Inc. (4) CCL · Carnival Corporation Ltd. (4) CDNS · Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (4) CDW · CDW Corporation (3) CEG · Constellation Energy Corporation (4) CF · CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (4) CFG · Citizens Financial Group Inc. (4) CHD · Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (4) CHRW · C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. (4) CHTR · Charter Communications Inc. (4) CI · The Cigna Group (4) CIEN · Ciena Corporation (4) CINF · Cincinnati Financial Corporation (3) CL · Colgate-Palmolive Co. (4) CLX · The Clorox Company (4) CMCSA · Comcast Corp. (4) CME · CME Group Inc. (4) CMG · Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (4) CMI · Cummins Inc. (4) CMS · CMS Energy Corporation (3) CNC · Centene Corp. (4) CNP · CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (4) COF · Capital One Financial Corp. (4) COHR · Coherent Corp. (7) COIN · Coinbase Global Inc. (3) COO · The Cooper Companies, Inc. (4) COP · ConocoPhillips (4) COR · Cencora Inc. (4) COST · Costco Wholesale Corporation (4) CPAY · Corpay Inc. (4) CPRT · Copart, Inc. (4) CPT · Camden Property Trust (4) CRCL · Circle Internet Group Inc. (5) CRDO · Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (8) CRH · CRH plc (4) CRL · Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (4) CRM · Salesforce, Inc. (4) CRWD · CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (4) CSCO · Cisco Systems Inc. (4) CSGP · CoStar Group, Inc. (4) CSX · CSX Corporation (4) CTAS · Cintas Corporation (4) CTSH · Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. (3) CTVA · Corteva Inc. (3) CVNA · Carvana Co. (4) CVS · CVS Health Corporation (4) CVX · Chevron Corp. (4) D · Dominion Energy, Inc. (4) DAL · Delta Air Lines, Inc. (4) DASH · DoorDash, Inc. (4) DD · DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (4) DDOG · Datadog Inc. Class A (4) DE · Deere & Company (4) DECK · Deckers Outdoor Corporation (4) DELL · Dell Technologies Inc. (7) DG · Dollar General Corp. (4) DGX · Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (4) DHI · D.R. Horton, Inc. (4) DHR · Danaher Corp. (4) DIS · The Walt Disney Company (4) DLR · Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (4) DLTR · Dollar Tree Inc. (4) DOC · Healthpeak Properties, Inc. (4) DOV · Dover Corporation (4) DOW · Dow Inc. (4) DPZ · Domino's Pizza, Inc. (4) DRI · Darden Restaurants, Inc. (4) DTE · DTE Energy Company (4) DUK · Duke Energy Corporation (4) DVA · DaVita Inc. (4) DVN · Devon Energy Corporation (4) DXCM · DexCom Inc. (4) EBAY · eBay Inc. (4) ECHO · EchoStar Corp. (4) ECL · Ecolab Inc. (4) ED · Consolidated Edison Inc. (4) EFX · Equifax Inc. (4) EG · Everest Group, Ltd. (4) EIX · Edison International (4) EL · The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (4) ELV · Elevance Health, Inc. (4) EME · EMCOR Group, Inc. (4) EMR · Emerson Electric Co. (4) EOG · EOG Resources, Inc. (4) EQIX · Equinix, Inc. (4) ERIE · Erie Indemnity Company (4) EWY · iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (6) FLNC · Fluence Energy, Inc. (7) GS · The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (6) HOOD · Robinhood Markets Inc. (7) IBM · International Business Machines Corporation (6) INTC · Intel Corporation (6) IREN · IREN Limited (6) LITE · Lumentum Holdings Inc. (5) META · Meta Platforms Inc. (6) MRVL · Marvell Technology, Inc. (6) MSFT · Microsoft Corporation (7) MSTR · Strategy Inc. (7) MU · Micron Technology Inc. (7) NFLX · Netflix Inc. (8) NOK · Nokia Corporation Sponsored ADR (6) NVDA · NVIDIA Corporation (7) PLTR · Palantir Technologies Inc. (8) PYPL · PayPal Holdings, Inc. (6) QQQ · Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (6) RKLB · Rocket Lab Corporation (4) SKHY · SK hynix Inc. ADR (3) SMCI · Super Micro Computer Inc. (5) SMH · VanEck Semiconductor ETF (4) SNDK · Sandisk Corp. (4) SOXS · Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (3) SPCX · Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (3) TSLA · Tesla, Inc. (6) TSM · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. ADR (4) USAR · USA Rare Earth, Inc. (2)
Visão geral da estratégia selecionada

ECL · Ecolab Inc.

Stock Universe · mercado global de ações
USD · NYSE · XNYS · United States
ECL 0 +1236.78% 1TRAD-KSY2
Recomendado pela DevioLab · Core 1 iCada ticker — um par de criptomoedas ou uma ação/ETF — pode ter várias estratégias com frequências de negociação e níveis de risco diferentes. Core 1 é a seleção principal e mais equilibrada da DevioLab para esse ticker: o sistema prioriza o controle de risco e drawdown. É a opção inicial preferida. Você também pode escolher uma estratégia mais conservadora ou agressiva comparando suas operações e gráficos abaixo.
Recomendado pela DevioLab · Core 2 iCore 2 é a seleção mais dinâmica e agressiva da DevioLab para um ticker. Aceita mais risco e drawdowns mais profundos em troca de retornos potencialmente maiores. Compare as operações e gráficos das diferentes estratégias abaixo e escolha o perfil adequado.
121Operações
82.6%Taxa de acerto
+2.47%Operação média
+22.51%Melhor operação
-18.37%Pior operação
+136.7%Anualizado
Perfil analítico da estratégia · 2b388f6f8c7ef680

ECL · ECL Algorithmic Strategy Analysis: Evaluating a High-Win-Rate 15-Minute System for Automated Trading

An in-depth quantitative examination of the top-ranked algorithmic trading strategy for ECL on the 15-minute timeframe. Across nearly seven years of historical evaluation spanning 120 completed trades, the strategy achieved an 82.50% win rate, a 2.50 profit factor, and a cumulative closed-trade profit sum of +1236.78%. Driven by longer positional holding periods averaging over 300 hours despite operating on a 15-minute execution chart, this system presents a distinctive structural profile suitable for automated trading bots and trading robots seeking lower execution frequency with high statistical hit rates.

Análise em 23.10.2026. Os dados da estratégia são atualizados separadamente.
Ler análise completa

Strategy profile

The algorithmic trading strategy designated as ECL 0 +1236.78% 1TRAD-KSY2 represents the premier core system for ECL stock in the DevioLab quantitative database, holding the rank of number one for this asset with a DevioLab score of 79.67. Evaluated over a historical sample extending from September 16, 2019, to September 11, 2026—a duration of approximately 6.99 years—the strategy operates on a 15-minute candle interval. Across this entire sample, the algorithm executed 120 completed trades, generating a total cumulative profit sum across closed trades of +1236.78% and an annualized rate of 136.66%. The foundation of this historical output rests on an exceptional win rate of 82.50%, with 99 out of 120 trades closing in positive territory against 21 losing trades. Designed as robust decision logic for execution via automated trading bots or trading agents, the strategy demonstrates how high-precision entry filtering on lower-timeframe charts can be paired with extended position management to capture broad multi-day trend moves while maintaining high statistical efficiency.

Trading rhythm and position duration

Despite utilizing a 15-minute price candle for signal generation, the strategy exhibits a distinctly patient trading rhythm that separates it from standard intraday systems. Over the 6.99-year backtest horizon, the algorithm generated an average of 17.17 trades per year, which translates to approximately 1.79 trades per active month. Position holding times reflect a multi-day to multi-week perspective rather than quick intraday turnover. The average holding duration per position stands at 301.47 hours (roughly 12.56 calendar days), while the median holding time is 193.00 hours (about 8.04 days). This divergence between mean and median holding times indicates that while most trades resolve within eight to ten days, select positions extend significantly longer to capture sustained directional trends. Furthermore, the average interval between position exits is 21.37 days, with a median of 16.99 days. For deployment in automated trading robots, this structural cadence implies low operational overhead and minimal exposure to market noise, allowing automated agents to operate with high structural selectivity.

Quality of historical results

A critical feature of this strategy is the structural quality and symmetry of its return distribution. The strategy achieves a profit factor of 2.50, meaning gross gains exceeded gross losses by two and a half times. The average trade yield stands at +2.43%, closely mirrored by a median trade yield of +2.83%. The close proximity of the median to the mean highlights a remarkably stable distribution where typical trades regularly hit the expected performance baseline, rather than relying on extreme statistical outliers. The best single trade recorded a gain of +22.51%, while the worst trade resulted in a loss of -18.37%. Crucially, the top three winning trades collectively account for only 12.48% of the strategy's total gross profit. This exceptionally low profit concentration demonstrates that the strategy's total cumulative gain of +1236.78% is broad-based and repeatable, derived from a high density of consistent winning trades across the dataset rather than a handful of lucky windfall events.

Risk, drawdown and losing behavior

Every quantitative system involves risk trade-offs, and evaluating losing periods provides vital context for automated trade execution. The strategy experienced a maximum historical drawdown of 22.21%. When contextualized against the total cumulative gain of +1236.78% and a profit factor of 2.50, this drawdown figure reflects manageable historical equity retracement relative to overall growth. The algorithm's losing behavior is characterized by brief, controlled clusters. The longest winning streak reached 14 consecutive trades, whereas the longest losing streak was restricted to just 3 consecutive trades. Out of 120 total trade events, only 21 yielded negative returns. However, the worst single loss of -18.37% indicates that when market conditions diverge sharply from the strategy's rules, individual drawdowns can approach the magnitude of the full strategy peak-to-trough dECLine. Operators utilizing trading bots must recognize that while losing sequences are historically rare, individual stop events require adequate risk buffer to withstand periodic positional adjustments.

Behavior through time and yearly stability

Analyzing the annual breakdown from 2019 through 2026 demonstrates consistent equity growth across varied market regimes. In 2019, during a partial initial sample, the strategy logged 3 trades with a 100% win rate and a +6.14% return. In 2020, trade frequency expanded to 16 trades, yielding 13 wins (81.25% win rate) and a peak annual total of +78.03%. Performance remained robust in 2021, generating +48.96% across 21 trades with a 90.48% win rate. The year 2022 presented the most challenging conditions in the dataset, resulting in 17 trades with 9 wins and 8 losses (52.94% win rate) and a modest net return of +3.19%. Following this period of market friction, the strategy recovered strongly in 2023 with +39.84% across 14 trades (92.86% win rate). Subsequent years maintained high consistency: 2024 produced +39.82% over 12 trades (91.67% win rate), 2025 delivered +36.50% across 19 trades (73.68% win rate), and 2026 recorded +39.07% over 18 trades (94.44% win rate). With positive closed returns in every single calendar year, the strategy showcases durable historical adaptability.

Recent period since 2024-06-01 versus full history

Evaluating recent activity provides valuable perspective on whether an algorithmic system maintains its structural edge in contemporary market conditions. In the window from June 1, 2024, to September 11, 2026, the strategy closed 45 trades, generating a cumulative return sum of +91.62%. This recent sample accounts for 37.5% of all total historical trades recorded since September 2019, confirming a substantial level of recent strategy activity. Comparing recent execution to the full history shows consistent alignment: the annualized return during this recent window remains strong, matching the high win-rate environment observed across full historical operations. Because the recent trade count is substantial rather than sparse, statistical conclusions drawn from recent history reinforce the persistent effectiveness of the entry and exit parameters on ECL stock.

Strengths and limitations

The primary structural strength of this strategy lies in its high win rate of 82.50% combined with a low profit concentration of 12.48% across its top three winners, ensuring that strategy returns are well-distributed across many completed trades. Additionally, an average holding time of over 300 hours paired with low trade frequency (1.79 trades per active month) minimizes execution stress and makes the logic highly suited for automated trading agents. On the limitation side, the strategy's maximum historical drawdown of 22.21% and worst single trade loss of -18.37% demonstrate that positions can incur notable unrealized or realized losses during sharp counter-trend movements. Furthermore, the performance dip in 2022, where win rate dropped to 52.94%, highlights that prolonged trendless or volatile asset environments can temporarily suppress profitability.

DevioLab analytical conclusion

With a DevioLab score of 79.67 and the top ranking for ECL stock, this 15-minute core strategy presents a compelling quantitative profile characterized by high win frequency, low profit concentration, and multi-year consistency. By combining a fine-grained 15-minute timeframe for precision monitoring with multi-day position holding times, the system effectively bridges short-term execution control with macro trend capture. For quantitative traders and automated trading system architects, the empirical record demonstrates robust multi-year viability, provided capital management parameters are configured to accommodate maximum drawdowns on the order of 22%.

Data scope and methodology

The statistics in this report are derived from historical backtesting of closed trade events for ECL on the 15-minute timeframe between September 16, 2019, and September 11, 2026. All reported percentage gains, trade counts, win rates, drawdown figures, and holding durations reflect closed-trade historical simulations. Performance measurements do not account for external transaction costs, slippage, borrowing costs, or live execution latency, and they do not reflect actual brokerage account returns. Historical backtested performance provides empirical insight into strategy behavior but does not guarantee future results.

Análise completa da estratégia