Carregando o status do mercado de ações dos EUA…
➜
COMO COMEÇAR
Conclua toda a configuração do sistema em poucos minutos.
Abrir guia de início rápido →
Catálogo público · DEVIOLAB

ESTRATÉGIAS E BOTS DE TRADING

Escolha uma estratégia de trading e ative um bot que negocie automaticamente conforme suas regras.
Uma estratégia define as regras de compra e venda. Um bot de trading executa essas regras pela API de uma exchange compatível. Você também pode usar a estratégia escolhida como bot de sinais com notificações por Telegram e email.
FILTROS
Escolha Core 1 para um início equilibrado, selecione uma exchange para negociar e encontre o ticker desejado. Os filtros funcionam juntos.
Filtros de setores e grupos
Exchange de negociação?Mostra instrumentos disponíveis para negociação SPOT contra USDT conforme a última normalização. Clique novamente na exchange selecionada para mostrar todas.
A · Agilent Technologies Inc. (4) AAOI · Applied Optoelectronics Inc. (5) AAPL · Apple Inc. (7) ABBV · AbbVie Inc. (4) ABNB · Airbnb Inc. (4) ABT · Abbott Laboratories (4) ACGL · Arch Capital Group Ltd. (4) ACN · Accenture PLC Class A (4) ADBE · Adobe Inc. (3) ADI · Analog Devices Inc. (4) ADM · Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (4) ADP · Automatic Data Processing Inc. (4) ADSK · Autodesk Inc. (4) AEE · Ameren Corporation (4) AEP · American Electric Power Company, Inc. (4) AES · The AES Corporation (3) AFL · Aflac Incorporated (4) AIG · American International Group, Inc. (4) AIZ · Assurant Inc. (4) AJG · Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (4) AKAM · Akamai Technologies Inc. (4) ALAB · Astera Labs, Inc. (7) ALB · Albemarle Corporation (4) ALGN · Align Technology Inc. (4) ALL · The Allstate Corporation (3) ALLE · Allegion plc (4) ALNY · Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (4) AMAT · Applied Materials Inc. (6) AMCR · Amcor plc (4) AMD · Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (7) AME · AMETEK, Inc. (4) AMGN · Amgen Inc. (2) AMP · Ameriprise Financial Inc. (4) AMT · American Tower Corporation (4) AMZN · Amazon.com Inc. (7) ANET · Arista Networks Inc. (4) AON · Aon plc Class A (4) AOS · A. O. Smith Corporation (4) APA · APA Corporation (4) APD · Air Products and Chemicals Inc. (4) APH · Amphenol Corp. (4) APO · Apollo Global Management Inc. (4) APP · AppLovin Corporation (4) APTV · Aptiv PLC (4) ARE · Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (4) ARES · Ares Management Corp. (4) ARM · Arm Holdings plc ADR (7) ASML · ASML Holding N.V. NY (7) ASTS · AST SpaceMobile Inc. (6) ATO · Atmos Energy Corporation (4) AVGO · Broadcom Inc. (7) AVY · Avery Dennison Corporation (4) AWK · American Water Works Company, Inc. (4) AXON · Axon Enterprise, Inc. (4) AXP · American Express Company (4) AZO · AutoZone, Inc. (4) BA · Boeing Co/The (4) BABA · Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. ADR (6) BAC · Bank of America Corp. (4) BALL · Ball Corporation (4) BAX · Baxter International Inc. (4) BBY · Best Buy Co., Inc. (4) BDX · Becton, Dickinson and Company (4) BE · Bloom Energy Corp. (5) BEN · Franklin Templeton Inc. (4) BF.B · Brown-Forman Corp. (4) BG · Bunge Global SA (4) BIIB · Biogen Inc. (4) BK · The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (4) BKNG · Booking Holdings Inc. (4) BKR · Baker Hughes Company (4) BLDR · Builders FirstSource Inc. (3) BLK · BlackRock Inc. (4) BMNR · BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (5) BMY · Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (3) BNY · Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (3) BR · Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (4) BRK.B · Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B (4) BRO · Brown & Brown Inc. (4) BSX · Boston Scientific Corp. (3) BX · Blackstone Inc. (4) BXP · BXP, Inc. (4) C · Citigroup Inc. (4) CAH · Cardinal Health Inc. (4) CARR · Carrier Global Corp. (4) CASY · Casey's General Stores, Inc. (4) CAT · Caterpillar Inc. (4) CB · Chubb Limited (4) CBOE · Cboe Global Markets Inc. (4) CBRE · CBRE Group Inc. (4) CCEP · Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (4) CCI · Crown Castle Inc. (4) CCL · Carnival Corporation Ltd. (4) CDNS · Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (4) CDW · CDW Corporation (3) CEG · Constellation Energy Corporation (4) CF · CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (4) CFG · Citizens Financial Group Inc. (4) CHD · Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (4) CHRW · C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. (4) CHTR · Charter Communications Inc. (4) CI · The Cigna Group (4) CIEN · Ciena Corporation (4) CINF · Cincinnati Financial Corporation (3) CL · Colgate-Palmolive Co. (4) CLX · The Clorox Company (4) CMCSA · Comcast Corp. (4) CME · CME Group Inc. (4) CMG · Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (4) CMI · Cummins Inc. (4) CMS · CMS Energy Corporation (3) CNC · Centene Corp. (4) CNP · CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (4) COF · Capital One Financial Corp. (4) COHR · Coherent Corp. (7) COIN · Coinbase Global Inc. (3) COO · The Cooper Companies, Inc. (3) COP · ConocoPhillips (4) COR · Cencora Inc. (4) COST · Costco Wholesale Corporation (4) CPAY · Corpay Inc. (4) CPRT · Copart, Inc. (4) CPT · Camden Property Trust (4) CRCL · Circle Internet Group Inc. (5) CRDO · Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (8) CRH · CRH plc (4) CRL · Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (4) CRM · Salesforce, Inc. (4) CRWD · CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (4) CSCO · Cisco Systems Inc. (4) CSGP · CoStar Group, Inc. (4) CSX · CSX Corporation (4) CTAS · Cintas Corporation (4) CTSH · Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. (3) CTVA · Corteva Inc. (4) CVNA · Carvana Co. (4) CVS · CVS Health Corporation (4) CVX · Chevron Corp. (4) D · Dominion Energy, Inc. (4) DAL · Delta Air Lines, Inc. (4) DASH · DoorDash, Inc. (4) DD · DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (4) DDOG · Datadog Inc. Class A (4) DE · Deere & Company (4) DELL · Dell Technologies Inc. (6) EWY · iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (6) FLNC · Fluence Energy, Inc. (7) GS · The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (6) HOOD · Robinhood Markets Inc. (7) IBM · International Business Machines Corporation (6) INTC · Intel Corporation (6) IREN · IREN Limited (7) LITE · Lumentum Holdings Inc. (6) META · Meta Platforms Inc. (7) MRVL · Marvell Technology, Inc. (6) MSFT · Microsoft Corporation (7) MSTR · Strategy Inc. (7) MU · Micron Technology Inc. (7) NFLX · Netflix Inc. (8) NOK · Nokia Corporation Sponsored ADR (7) NVDA · NVIDIA Corporation (7) PLTR · Palantir Technologies Inc. (7) PYPL · PayPal Holdings, Inc. (6) QQQ · Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (5) RKLB · Rocket Lab Corporation (4) SKHY · SK hynix Inc. ADR (3) SMCI · Super Micro Computer Inc. (6) SMH · VanEck Semiconductor ETF (4) SNDK · Sandisk Corp. (4) SOXS · Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (3) SPCX · Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (3) TSLA · Tesla, Inc. (6) TSM · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. ADR (5) USAR · USA Rare Earth, Inc. (3)
Visão geral da estratégia selecionada

DD · DuPont de Nemours, Inc.

Stock Universe · mercado global de ações
USD · NYSE · XNYS · United States
DD 0 +2718.95% 1TRAD-QOB3
Recomendado pela DevioLab · Core 1 iCada ticker — um par de criptomoedas ou uma ação/ETF — pode ter várias estratégias com frequências de negociação e níveis de risco diferentes. Core 1 é a seleção principal e mais equilibrada da DevioLab para esse ticker: o sistema prioriza o controle de risco e drawdown. É a opção inicial preferida. Você também pode escolher uma estratégia mais conservadora ou agressiva comparando suas operações e gráficos abaixo.
Recomendado pela DevioLab · Core 2 iCore 2 é a seleção mais dinâmica e agressiva da DevioLab para um ticker. Aceita mais risco e drawdowns mais profundos em troca de retornos potencialmente maiores. Compare as operações e gráficos das diferentes estratégias abaixo e escolha o perfil adequado.
147Operações
78.9%Taxa de acerto
+2.63%Operação média
+30.11%Melhor operação
-16.01%Pior operação
+153.3%Anualizado
Perfil analítico da estratégia · ba999f7608e188dd

Quantitative Evaluation of DD Algorithmic Trading Strategy: High Win Rate and Balanced Payoff Architecture in Stock Market Execution

This analytical report evaluates the quantitative performance profile of the DD 0 +2718.95% 1TRAD-QOB3 algorithmic trading strategy operating on 15-minute chart intervals for the stock asset DD. Spanning a 7.06-year test horizon from September 2019 to October 2026, the strategy recorded 147 completed trades, achieving a high win rate of 78.91% alongside a profit factor of 2.50 and a cumulative closed-trade return sum of +2718.95%. Designed to serve as the decision logic for automated trading bots, trading robots, and quantitative trading agents, the system exhibits a multi-day swing trading rhythm with an average holding time of 215.44 hours and an average interval between exits of 17.61 days. A key structural finding is the extraordinary dispersion of gross profit: the top three winning trades account for only 12.94% of total gross gains, indicating that overall returns are derived from a broad base of consistent positive outcomes rather than isolated luck. Peak drawdown reached 24.51%, while losing streaks were strictly capped at 3 consecutive trades. Recent activity since June 1, 2024, accounts for 50 completed trades yielding a sum of +108.84%, demonstrating sustained operational activity in contemporary market conditions. Achieving a DevioLab score of 73.08 and ranking second for the asset DD, the strategy combines robust hit rates with low profit concentration, though its low overall frequency requires operational discipline.

Análise em 16.10.2026. Os dados da estratégia são atualizados separadamente.
Ler análise completa

Strategy profile

The algorithmic trading model designated as DD 0 +2718.95% 1TRAD-QOB3 is a specialized core model designed for execution on 15-minute timeframe data for the equity asset DD. Built to function as the core decision-making logic for automated trading bots and algorithmic trading agents, the strategy aims to systematically filter intraday market noise to capture medium-term swing movements. Over an extensive evaluation period of 7.06 years—stretching from September 16, 2019, through October 8, 2026—the quantitative engine completed 147 trade cycles. The backtested dataset demonstrates a aggregate return sum of +2718.95% across closed trades, translating into an annualized trade return metric of 153.34%. Within the DevioLab quantitative rating system, this performance profile yields an overall DevioLab score of 73.08, placing the strategy at rank 2 among evaluated quantitative models for the symbol DD. The core architectural signature relies on high precision in trade execution, generating 116 winning positions against 31 losing positions, which establishes a baseline win rate of 78.91%. This high hit rate serves as the primary engine for equity growth, minimizing equity variance and establishing a stable foundation for automated trade deployment.

Trading rhythm and position duration

Despite operating on a 15-minute candlestick chart, the strategy is explicitly a swing-trading algorithm rather than an intraday scalping framework. The statistical record indicates an average holding duration per position of 215.44 hours (approximately 8.98 days), with a median holding period of 147.50 hours (approximately 6.15 days). The positive divergence between the average and median duration demonstrates that while the typical position resolves within roughly six days, selected trades remain active for multiple weeks to allow longer price trends to fully develop. In terms of execution frequency, the strategy averages 20.81 completed trades per year, which corresponds to approximately 1.86 trades per active month. The spacing between trade exits averages 17.61 days, with a median exit interval of 13.99 days. For traders utilizing trading robots or automated execution bots, this cadence implies long inactive periods interspersed with structured, multi-day open exposure. The strategy does not overtrade or generate excessive turnover, making it suitable for systematic frameworks where position management and trend persistence are prioritized over high-frequency turnover.

Quality of historical results

An examination of payoff metrics reveals a remarkably balanced trade distribution. The average trade yield across all 147 closed positions stands at +2.63%, while the median trade yield is +2.51%. The proximity of the median to the average indicates that historical trade returns are symmetrically distributed without extreme skewness caused by anomalous single trades. The profit factor of 2.50 reflects a strong ratio of gross mathematical gains relative to gross mathematical losses. The strategy's maximum single trade gain reached +30.11%, whereas its worst single trade loss was limited to -16.01%. Crucially, an analysis of profit concentration reveals that the top three winning trades collectively generated only 12.94% of the strategy's total gross profit. In quantitative research, a low top-three profit concentration indicates that strategy profitability is structural and broad-based, rather than dependent on a tiny handful of outlier gains. The consistent positive expectancy across 116 winning trades confirms that the system achieves its net performance through repeated statistical edge across changing market cycles.

Risk, drawdown and losing behavior

The historical risk envelope of the strategy highlights both controlled downside exposure and moderate path volatility. Over the full 7.06-year test horizon, the maximum peak-to-trough drawdown recorded was 24.51%. When evaluated alongside the strategy's cumulative trade return sum of +2718.95% and a profit factor of 2.50, a 24.51% maximum drawdown represents a reasonable downside tolerance for an unleveraged equity growth algorithm. Furthermore, the strategy exhibits remarkable resilience regarding losing streaks: the maximum consecutive loss sequence was strictly capped at 3 trades, whereas the longest winning streak reached 11 consecutive profitable trades. The worst single trade loss of -16.01% demonstrates that while individual tail losses can occur during adverse market regime shifts, the algorithm's exit mechanism successfully prevents catastrophic drawdowns. The combination of a high win rate (78.91%) and brief losing streaks helps limit extended emotional or financial drawdowns, facilitating smoother capital curves during live execution via trading bots.

Behavior through time and yearly stability

The yearly performance breakdown illustrates sustained profitability across diverse stock market environments, though annual net return totals reflect shifting market volatility. In the initial short dataset of 2019 (starting September 16), the strategy logged 4 trades (75.00% win rate) yielding a sum of +0.92%. Performance expanded substantially in 2020, producing 24 trades, an 83.33% win rate, and a annual trade sum of +113.82%. In 2021, the system executed 21 trades with a 71.43% win rate and a +53.25% sum, followed by 2022 where it completed 24 trades with a 70.83% win rate and a +69.97% sum, demonstrating resilience during broader market contractions. The year 2023 yielded 18 trades, an 83.33% win rate, and a +29.36% sum. In 2024, performance rebounded strongly with 15 trades, a 93.33% win rate, and a +42.29% return sum. The calendar year 2025 marked a minor temporary consolidation, recording 16 trades, a 62.50% win rate, and a +14.69% sum. In 2026 (through October 8), trading volume expanded to 25 trades with an 88.00% win rate and a +62.60% return sum. Every single calendar year recorded net positive cumulative closed-trade returns, proving consistent adaptation across varying market conditions.

Recent period since 2024-06-01 versus full history

A detailed audit of recent performance statistics calculated from trades closing on or after June 1, 2024, provides clear evidence of ongoing signal validity. In this recent window, the strategy completed 50 closed trades, generating a cumulative trade return sum of +108.84%. This sample of 50 recent trades represents roughly one-third of the total historical trade sample (147 trades) accumulated over 7.06 years, indicating a noticeable increase in trade execution frequency during recent market regimes. The average yield per trade in the recent window remains highly competitive, contributing over 100 percentage points of total closed-trade performance in less than two years. The seamless alignment between long-term historical metrics (78.91% win rate, +2.63% average trade) and recent trade generation confirms that the underlying quantitative edge has remained fully intact and active through contemporary trading conditions.

Strengths and limitations

The primary structural strength of the DD strategy lies in its exceptional statistical reliability. Key advantages include a high win rate of 78.91%, a solid profit factor of 2.50, a low profit concentration (top 3 trades generating just 12.94% of gross profit), and a capped maximum losing streak of 3 trades. ADDitionally, the algorithm has achieved net positive closed-trade returns in every single calendar year from 2019 through 2026. Conversely, structural limitations must be considered. With an average of only 20.81 trades per year (1.86 per active month) and an average holding duration of 215.44 hours, the strategy generates low signal frequency, requiring traders to exercise patience. A maximum drawdown of 24.51% and a worst trade loss of -16.01% also mean that users of automated trading agents must be prepared for periodic price pullbacks. Finally, as a simulated backtest study, actual live market results will naturally be impacted by order execution efficiency, bid-ask spreads, and slippage.

DevioLab analytical conclusion

The DD 0 +2718.95% 1TRAD-QOB3 trading strategy represents a robust, high-precision swing trading framework for the stock asset DD on 15-minute price charts. Earning a DevioLab score of 73.08 and holding the rank 2 position for its asset, the algorithm demonstrates exceptional statistical integrity. Its primary quantitative highlight is the rare combination of a high win rate (78.91%) and exceptionally well-distributed gains, evidenced by a top-three winner concentration of only 12.94%. Rather than relying on lucky market spikes, the strategy consistently captures medium-term trends across multi-day holding periods averaging 8.98 days. With 50 trades completed since June 2024 yielding +108.84%, recent performance reinforces the system's ongoing relevance. For quantitative traders seeking reliable logic to power automated trading robots or trading agents, this strategy offers a disciplined, statistically validated blueprint.

Data scope and methodology

All figures, metrics, and analytical observations presented in this report are calculated directly from historical backtested market data for the asset symbol DD on a 15-minute time interval between September 16, 2019, and October 8, 2026. Performance metrics, including cumulative closed-trade returns (+2718.95%), average trade yields (+2.63%), drawdowns (24.51%), and holding durations, reflect simulated executions on historical closed trades. These performance statistics are designed to evaluate algorithmic signal quality and do not account for external transaction costs, broker commissions, or execution slippage. Historical simulated backtest results are intended purely for quantitative research and algorithmic logic evaluation; they do not constitute financial advice or guarantee future investment performance.

Análise completa da estratégia