Carregando o status do mercado de ações dos EUA…
➜
COMO COMEÇAR
Conclua toda a configuração do sistema em poucos minutos.
Abrir guia de início rápido →
Catálogo público · DEVIOLAB

CATÁLOGO DE ESTRATÉGIAS

Explore estratégias algorítmicas, compare o desempenho e abra o histórico completo de cada modelo.
Cada estratégia algorítmica corresponde a um agente de trading real (Trading Bot), criado pela equipe DevioLab a partir de testes com dados históricos. Ela pode ser usada para trading automatizado via API em plataformas compatíveis, incluindo Binance, ou apenas como Signal Bot com notificações por Telegram e email.
2 · Ticker
⌕
FILTROS
Todas as condições selecionadas funcionam juntas
Filtros de setores e grupos
DISPONIBILIDADE NAS CORRETORAS
A · Agilent Technologies Inc. (4) AAOI · Applied Optoelectronics Inc. (5) AAPL · Apple Inc. (7) ABBV · AbbVie Inc. (4) ABNB · Airbnb Inc. (4) ABT · Abbott Laboratories (4) ACGL · Arch Capital Group Ltd. (4) ACN · Accenture PLC Class A (4) ADBE · Adobe Inc. (3) ADI · Analog Devices Inc. (4) ADM · Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (4) ADP · Automatic Data Processing Inc. (4) ADSK · Autodesk Inc. (4) AEE · Ameren Corporation (4) AEP · American Electric Power Company, Inc. (4) AES · The AES Corporation (3) AFL · Aflac Incorporated (4) AIG · American International Group, Inc. (4) AIZ · Assurant Inc. (4) AJG · Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (4) AKAM · Akamai Technologies Inc. (4) ALAB · Astera Labs, Inc. (7) ALB · Albemarle Corporation (4) ALGN · Align Technology Inc. (4) ALL · The Allstate Corporation (4) ALLE · Allegion plc (4) ALNY · Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (4) AMAT · Applied Materials Inc. (7) AMCR · Amcor plc (4) AMD · Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (7) AME · AMETEK, Inc. (4) AMGN · Amgen Inc. (2) AMP · Ameriprise Financial Inc. (4) AMT · American Tower Corporation (4) AMZN · Amazon.com Inc. (7) ANET · Arista Networks Inc. (4) AON · Aon plc Class A (4) AOS · A. O. Smith Corporation (4) APA · APA Corporation (4) APD · Air Products and Chemicals Inc. (4) APH · Amphenol Corp. (4) APO · Apollo Global Management Inc. (4) APP · AppLovin Corporation (4) APTV · Aptiv PLC (4) ARE · Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (4) ARES · Ares Management Corp. (4) ARM · Arm Holdings plc ADR (7) ASML · ASML Holding N.V. NY (7) ASTS · AST SpaceMobile Inc. (6) ATO · Atmos Energy Corporation (4) AVGO · Broadcom Inc. (7) AVY · Avery Dennison Corporation (4) AWK · American Water Works Company, Inc. (4) AXON · Axon Enterprise, Inc. (4) AXP · American Express Company (4) AZO · AutoZone, Inc. (4) BA · Boeing Co/The (4) BABA · Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. ADR (6) BAC · Bank of America Corp. (4) BALL · Ball Corporation (4) BAX · Baxter International Inc. (4) BBY · Best Buy Co., Inc. (4) BDX · Becton, Dickinson and Company (4) BE · Bloom Energy Corp. (5) BEN · Franklin Templeton Inc. (4) BF.B · Brown-Forman Corp. (4) BG · Bunge Global SA (4) BIIB · Biogen Inc. (4) BK · The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (4) BKNG · Booking Holdings Inc. (4) BKR · Baker Hughes Company (4) BLDR · Builders FirstSource Inc. (3) BLK · BlackRock Inc. (4) BMNR · BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (5) BMY · Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (3) BNY · Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (3) BR · Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (4) BRK.B · Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B (4) BRO · Brown & Brown Inc. (4) BSX · Boston Scientific Corp. (3) BX · Blackstone Inc. (4) BXP · BXP, Inc. (4) C · Citigroup Inc. (4) CAH · Cardinal Health Inc. (4) CARR · Carrier Global Corp. (4) CASY · Casey's General Stores, Inc. (4) CAT · Caterpillar Inc. (4) CB · Chubb Limited (4) CBOE · Cboe Global Markets Inc. (4) CBRE · CBRE Group Inc. (4) CCEP · Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (4) CCI · Crown Castle Inc. (4) CCL · Carnival Corporation Ltd. (4) CDNS · Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (4) CDW · CDW Corporation (3) CEG · Constellation Energy Corporation (4) CF · CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (4) CFG · Citizens Financial Group Inc. (4) CHD · Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (4) CHRW · C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. (4) CHTR · Charter Communications Inc. (4) CI · The Cigna Group (4) CIEN · Ciena Corporation (4) CINF · Cincinnati Financial Corporation (3) CL · Colgate-Palmolive Co. (4) CLX · The Clorox Company (4) CMCSA · Comcast Corp. (4) CME · CME Group Inc. (4) CMG · Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (4) CMI · Cummins Inc. (4) CMS · CMS Energy Corporation (3) CNC · Centene Corp. (4) CNP · CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (4) COF · Capital One Financial Corp. (4) COHR · Coherent Corp. (7) COIN · Coinbase Global Inc. (3) COO · The Cooper Companies, Inc. (3) COP · ConocoPhillips (4) COR · Cencora Inc. (4) COST · Costco Wholesale Corporation (4) CPAY · Corpay Inc. (4) CPRT · Copart, Inc. (4) CPT · Camden Property Trust (4) CRCL · Circle Internet Group Inc. (5) CRDO · Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (8) CRH · CRH plc (4) CRL · Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (4) CRM · Salesforce, Inc. (4) CRWD · CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (4) CSCO · Cisco Systems Inc. (4) CSGP · CoStar Group, Inc. (4) CSX · CSX Corporation (4) CTAS · Cintas Corporation (4) CTSH · Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. (3) CTVA · Corteva Inc. (4) DELL · Dell Technologies Inc. (6) EWY · iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (6) FLNC · Fluence Energy, Inc. (7) GS · The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (6) HOOD · Robinhood Markets Inc. (7) IBM · International Business Machines Corporation (6) INTC · Intel Corporation (6) IREN · IREN Limited (7) LITE · Lumentum Holdings Inc. (6) META · Meta Platforms Inc. (7) MRVL · Marvell Technology, Inc. (6) MSFT · Microsoft Corporation (7) MSTR · Strategy Inc. (7) MU · Micron Technology Inc. (7) NFLX · Netflix Inc. (8) NOK · Nokia Corporation Sponsored ADR (7) NVDA · NVIDIA Corporation (7) PLTR · Palantir Technologies Inc. (7) PYPL · PayPal Holdings, Inc. (6) QQQ · Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (6) RKLB · Rocket Lab Corporation (4) SKHY · SK hynix Inc. ADR (3) SMCI · Super Micro Computer Inc. (6) SMH · VanEck Semiconductor ETF (4) SNDK · Sandisk Corp. (4) SOXS · Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (3) SPCX · Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (3) TSLA · Tesla, Inc. (6) TSM · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. ADR (5) USAR · USA Rare Earth, Inc. (3)
Visão geral da estratégia selecionada

ANET · Arista Networks Inc.

Stock Universe · mercado global de ações
USD · NYSE · XNYS · United States
ANET 0 +30761.57% 1TRAD-YFB1
Recomendado pela DevioLab · Core 1 iRecomendação principal da DevioLab: perfil mais protegido, suave e estável, focado no controle de risco e drawdown.
Recomendado pela DevioLab · Core 2 iRecomendação mais agressiva da DevioLab: aceita maior risco e drawdowns mais profundos em troca de retornos potencialmente maiores.
122Operações
77.9%Taxa de acerto
+5.31%Operação média
+47.52%Melhor operação
-15.03%Pior operação
+1,280.6%Anualizado
Perfil analítico da estratégia · 5d6b3876f19db761

ANET Quantitative Strategy Analysis: Evaluating a High-Win-Rate Multi-Day Algorithmic Model

This analytical report examines a top-ranked algorithmic trading strategy designed for ANET on the 15-minute timeframe. Evaluated across nearly seven years of historical backtest data from September 2019 to August 2026, the strategy exhibits a overall win rate of 77.87% across 122 completed trades, yielding an exceptional cumulative gain with a profit factor of 3.75 and a strictly controlled maximum drawdown of 15.03%. Operating with an average position holding duration of approximately 13 days (311.68 hours) and an average exit frequency of once every 20.94 days, the strategy displays a disciplined multi-day swing architecture suited for deployment within automated trading bots and algorithmic trading agents. Furthermore, with the top three gross winners accounting for just 14.30% of total profits and a robust post-June 2024 performance window generating 285.68% across 50 trades, the quantitative profile demonstrates persistent structural efficiency rather than reliance on single-event outliers.

Análise em 17.09.2026. Os dados da estratégia são atualizados separadamente.
Ler análise completa

Strategy profile

The algorithmic strategy designated for ANET represents a core multi-day quantitative model operating on a 15-minute price bar interval. Holding the top analytical ranking on DevioLab for this asset with a score of 78.32, the strategy is engineered to serve as the underlying decision logic for automated trading bots and execution agents operating in stock markets. Over an evaluation period spanning 6.95 years from September 16, 2019, through August 26, 2026, the model completed 122 trades. Rather than relying on rapid intra-day turnover, the architecture uses the 15-minute granularity to identify structural entry points while holding positions across extended time horizons. The strategy achieves a cumulative simulated historical return of 30,761.57% with an annualized return metric of 1,280.56%, reflecting a highly selective swing-trading methodology that balances high trade precision with sustained trend capture.

Trading rhythm and position duration

Despite utilizing a lower-timeframe 15-minute price series, the strategy displays a distinctly patient trading rhythm. It generates an average of 17.57 completed trades per year, which translates to roughly 1.72 completed trades per active month. Position holding times reflect a multi-day to multi-week profile, with an average holding duration of 311.68 hours (approximately 13.0 days) and a median holding duration of 194.75 hours (approximately 8.1 days). The gap between the average and median holding times indicates that while many trades exit within a week, select high-conviction positions remain open for significantly longer periods to ride macroeconomic or structural equity swings. Exits occur at a measured cadence, averaging 20.94 days between trade completions with a median spacing of 18.02 days. For quantitative traders deploying trading robots, this low trade frequency lowers portfolio turnover and minimizes exposure to execution friction.

Quality of historical results

The quality of historical results for ANET is driven by an exceptional hit rate paired with positive asymmetry between gains and losses. Out of 122 total trades, 95 ended in positive territory, producing a overall win rate of 77.87%. The profit factor stands at 3.75, confirming that total gross profits significantly outweighed total gross losses over the multi-year testing period. The average trade gain across all positions is 5.31%, closely tracking the median trade gain of 4.50%. This close alignment between mean and median expectations indicates a stable, reproducible trade distribution rather than a skewed profile dependent on extreme values. Additionally, the strategy's top three winning trades generated only 14.30% of aggregate gross profit, proving that returns are broad-based and distributed across dozens of successful positions rather than concentrated in a handful of fortunate market spikes. The single best trade realized a return of 47.52%, showcasing robust upside participation.

Risk, drawdown and losing behavior

Risk containment is one of the strategy's defining quantitative strengths. The peak-to-trough historical maximum drawdown was held to 15.03%, a notable figure given the high cumulative return generated across the multi-year window. This maximum drawdown aligns precisely with the strategy's single worst trade loss of -15.03%, suggesting that equity drawdowns were largely driven by isolated trade losses rather than compound multi-trade cascading collapses. Over its nearly seven-year history, the longest losing streak was limited to 5 consecutive negative trades, whereas the longest winning streak extended to 16 consecutive successful trades. The high win rate (77.87%) provides a psychological and statistical cushion, reducing the duration of underwater equity periods and offering strong stability characteristics for automated trading agents.

Behavior through time and yearly stability

A year-by-year examination reveals structural durability alongside periods of shifting market regimes. In its inaugural partial year of 2019, the strategy completed 2 trades with a 50.00% win rate and a modest net gain of 1.52%. It gained strong momentum in 2020, delivering 135.57% across 19 trades with an 84.21% win rate. Solid performance continued into 2021, generating 83.68% over 13 trades with an 84.62% win rate. In 2022, corresponding to broader equity market headwinds, the strategy experienced a performance slowdown, achieving a 40.00% win rate across 10 trades but still finishing positive with an 11.00% sum return. Rebound was swift in 2023, recording a 95.00% win rate across 20 trades for a 104.16% return. Consistency remained high in 2024 (+115.54%, 85.00% win rate across 20 trades) and 2025 (+115.68%, 81.82% win rate across 22 trades). In the final partial testing year of 2026, the strategy recorded 16 trades with a 56.25% win rate and an 80.98% return, illustrating that even during lower win-rate regimes, positive trade asymmetry maintains upward equity growth.

Recent period since 2024-06-01 versus full history

Analyzing performance in the recent sample window beginning June 1, 2024, provides vital insight into modern market responsiveness. Over this period, the strategy closed 50 trades, representing more than 40% of its entire lifetime trade volume. Summed returns in this recent window reached 285.68%, demonstrating that the model's underlying edge has remained active and highly effective in recent market conditions. The high trade density during this period (50 completed trades over roughly two calendar years) reflects heightened signal generation while preserving the core historical parameters. Comparing the recent sample to full-history metrics indicates that recent trade efficacy matches or exceeds the long-term baseline, offering statistical assurance that historical profitability is not merely an artifact of early data years.

Strengths and limitations

The primary analytical strengths of this ANET strategy reside in its robust win rate (77.87%), strong profit factor (3.75%), modest drawdown profile (15.03%), and exceptionally low profit concentration (top 3 winners at 14.30%). The patient multi-day holding structure allows automated trading bots to capture sustained equity trends without generating excessive execution costs. Conversely, the principal quantitative limitation stems from its selective signal frequency. Averaging only 17.57 trades per year, the strategy requires high capital patience, as extended periods of non-trading or holding active positions for weeks may test trader discipline. Additionally, during choppy market regimes like 2022, win rates can drop to 40.00%, though historical capital protection mechanisms successfully mitigated severe structural losses.

DevioLab analytical conclusion

The ANET 15-minute quantitative strategy represents a highly refined, core-grade algorithmic trading model. Earning a DevioLab score of 78.32 and ranking first among strategies for this asset, the model successfully resolves the classic tension between high hit rates and large payoff factors. By combining a 77.87% win rate with a 3.75 profit factor and holding maximum drawdown to 15.03%, the strategy delivers a rare balance of downside protection and strong upward return capture. Its multi-day position duration and distributed gross profit composition make it a robust candidate logic for deployment within automated trading agents and algorithmic trading systems seeking disciplined equity growth.

Data scope and methodology

This analysis is derived entirely from historical backtested data generated for ANET on the 15-minute timeframe between September 16, 2019, and August 26, 2026. All reported statistics, including completed trades, win rates, drawdowns, and holding durations, represent simulated quantitative evaluations. Performance metrics from the recent period starting June 1, 2024, evaluate trades closed on or after that date. These results serve historical research and strategy modeling purposes only and do not constitute financial advice, live trading recommendations, or guarantees of future performance.

Análise completa da estratégia