Chargement du statut du marché boursier américain…
➜
COMMENT DÉMARRER
Terminez la configuration complète du système en quelques minutes.
Ouvrir le guide de démarrage rapide →
Catalogue public · DEVIOLAB

STRATÉGIES ET BOTS DE TRADING

Choisissez une stratégie de trading et activez un bot qui négociera automatiquement selon ses règles.
Une stratégie définit les règles d’achat et de vente. Un bot de trading les exécute via l’API d’une plateforme compatible. Vous pouvez aussi utiliser la stratégie choisie comme bot de signaux avec des notifications Telegram et email.
FILTRES
Choisissez Core 1 pour un démarrage équilibré, sélectionnez une plateforme de trading et trouvez le ticker souhaité. Les filtres fonctionnent ensemble.
Filtres des secteurs et groupes
Plateforme de trading?Affiche les instruments disponibles en SPOT contre USDT selon la dernière normalisation. Cliquez à nouveau sur la plateforme choisie pour toutes les afficher.
A · Agilent Technologies Inc. (4) AAOI · Applied Optoelectronics Inc. (5) AAPL · Apple Inc. (7) ABBV · AbbVie Inc. (4) ABNB · Airbnb Inc. (4) ABT · Abbott Laboratories (4) ACGL · Arch Capital Group Ltd. (4) ACN · Accenture PLC Class A (4) ADBE · Adobe Inc. (3) ADI · Analog Devices Inc. (4) ADM · Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (4) ADP · Automatic Data Processing Inc. (4) ADSK · Autodesk Inc. (4) AEE · Ameren Corporation (4) AEP · American Electric Power Company, Inc. (4) AES · The AES Corporation (3) AFL · Aflac Incorporated (4) AIG · American International Group, Inc. (4) AIZ · Assurant Inc. (4) AJG · Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (4) AKAM · Akamai Technologies Inc. (4) ALAB · Astera Labs, Inc. (7) ALB · Albemarle Corporation (4) ALGN · Align Technology Inc. (4) ALL · The Allstate Corporation (4) ALLE · Allegion plc (4) ALNY · Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (4) AMAT · Applied Materials Inc. (7) AMCR · Amcor plc (4) AMD · Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (7) AME · AMETEK, Inc. (4) AMGN · Amgen Inc. (2) AMP · Ameriprise Financial Inc. (4) AMT · American Tower Corporation (4) AMZN · Amazon.com Inc. (7) ANET · Arista Networks Inc. (4) AON · Aon plc Class A (4) AOS · A. O. Smith Corporation (4) APA · APA Corporation (4) APD · Air Products and Chemicals Inc. (4) APH · Amphenol Corp. (4) APO · Apollo Global Management Inc. (4) APP · AppLovin Corporation (4) APTV · Aptiv PLC (4) ARE · Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (4) ARES · Ares Management Corp. (4) ARM · Arm Holdings plc ADR (7) ASML · ASML Holding N.V. NY (7) ASTS · AST SpaceMobile Inc. (6) ATO · Atmos Energy Corporation (4) AVGO · Broadcom Inc. (7) AVY · Avery Dennison Corporation (4) AWK · American Water Works Company, Inc. (4) AXON · Axon Enterprise, Inc. (4) AXP · American Express Company (4) AZO · AutoZone, Inc. (4) BA · Boeing Co/The (4) BABA · Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. ADR (6) BAC · Bank of America Corp. (4) BALL · Ball Corporation (4) BAX · Baxter International Inc. (4) BBY · Best Buy Co., Inc. (4) BDX · Becton, Dickinson and Company (4) BE · Bloom Energy Corp. (5) BEN · Franklin Templeton Inc. (4) BF.B · Brown-Forman Corp. (4) BG · Bunge Global SA (4) BIIB · Biogen Inc. (3) BK · The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (4) BKNG · Booking Holdings Inc. (4) BKR · Baker Hughes Company (4) BLDR · Builders FirstSource Inc. (3) BLK · BlackRock Inc. (4) BMNR · BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (5) BMY · Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (3) BNY · Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (4) BR · Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (4) BRK.B · Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B (4) BRO · Brown & Brown Inc. (4) BSX · Boston Scientific Corp. (3) BX · Blackstone Inc. (4) BXP · BXP, Inc. (4) C · Citigroup Inc. (4) CAH · Cardinal Health Inc. (4) CARR · Carrier Global Corp. (4) CASY · Casey's General Stores, Inc. (4) CAT · Caterpillar Inc. (4) CB · Chubb Limited (4) CBOE · Cboe Global Markets Inc. (4) CBRE · CBRE Group Inc. (4) CCEP · Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (4) CCI · Crown Castle Inc. (4) CCL · Carnival Corporation Ltd. (4) CDNS · Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (4) CDW · CDW Corporation (3) CEG · Constellation Energy Corporation (4) CF · CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (4) CFG · Citizens Financial Group Inc. (4) CHD · Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (4) CHRW · C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. (4) CHTR · Charter Communications Inc. (4) CI · The Cigna Group (4) CIEN · Ciena Corporation (4) CINF · Cincinnati Financial Corporation (3) CL · Colgate-Palmolive Co. (4) CLX · The Clorox Company (4) CMCSA · Comcast Corp. (4) CME · CME Group Inc. (4) CMG · Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (4) CMI · Cummins Inc. (4) CMS · CMS Energy Corporation (3) CNC · Centene Corp. (4) CNP · CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (4) COF · Capital One Financial Corp. (4) COHR · Coherent Corp. (7) COIN · Coinbase Global Inc. (3) COO · The Cooper Companies, Inc. (4) COP · ConocoPhillips (4) COR · Cencora Inc. (4) COST · Costco Wholesale Corporation (4) CPAY · Corpay Inc. (4) CPRT · Copart, Inc. (4) CPT · Camden Property Trust (4) CRCL · Circle Internet Group Inc. (5) CRDO · Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (8) CRH · CRH plc (4) CRL · Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (4) CRM · Salesforce, Inc. (4) CRWD · CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (4) CSCO · Cisco Systems Inc. (4) CSGP · CoStar Group, Inc. (4) CSX · CSX Corporation (4) CTAS · Cintas Corporation (4) CTSH · Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. (3) CTVA · Corteva Inc. (3) CVNA · Carvana Co. (4) CVS · CVS Health Corporation (4) CVX · Chevron Corp. (4) D · Dominion Energy, Inc. (4) DAL · Delta Air Lines, Inc. (4) DASH · DoorDash, Inc. (4) DD · DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (4) DDOG · Datadog Inc. Class A (4) DE · Deere & Company (4) DECK · Deckers Outdoor Corporation (4) DELL · Dell Technologies Inc. (7) DG · Dollar General Corp. (4) DGX · Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (4) DHI · D.R. Horton, Inc. (4) DHR · Danaher Corp. (4) DIS · The Walt Disney Company (4) DLR · Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (4) DLTR · Dollar Tree Inc. (4) DOC · Healthpeak Properties, Inc. (4) DOV · Dover Corporation (4) DOW · Dow Inc. (4) DPZ · Domino's Pizza, Inc. (4) DRI · Darden Restaurants, Inc. (4) DTE · DTE Energy Company (4) DUK · Duke Energy Corporation (4) DVA · DaVita Inc. (4) DVN · Devon Energy Corporation (4) DXCM · DexCom Inc. (4) EBAY · eBay Inc. (4) ECHO · EchoStar Corp. (4) ECL · Ecolab Inc. (4) ED · Consolidated Edison Inc. (4) EFX · Equifax Inc. (4) EG · Everest Group, Ltd. (4) EIX · Edison International (4) EL · The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (4) ELV · Elevance Health, Inc. (4) EME · EMCOR Group, Inc. (4) EMR · Emerson Electric Co. (4) EOG · EOG Resources, Inc. (4) EQIX · Equinix, Inc. (4) ERIE · Erie Indemnity Company (4) EWY · iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (6) FLNC · Fluence Energy, Inc. (7) GS · The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (6) HOOD · Robinhood Markets Inc. (7) IBM · International Business Machines Corporation (6) INTC · Intel Corporation (6) IREN · IREN Limited (6) LITE · Lumentum Holdings Inc. (5) META · Meta Platforms Inc. (6) MRVL · Marvell Technology, Inc. (6) MSFT · Microsoft Corporation (7) MSTR · Strategy Inc. (7) MU · Micron Technology Inc. (7) NFLX · Netflix Inc. (8) NOK · Nokia Corporation Sponsored ADR (6) NVDA · NVIDIA Corporation (7) PLTR · Palantir Technologies Inc. (8) PYPL · PayPal Holdings, Inc. (6) QQQ · Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (6) RKLB · Rocket Lab Corporation (4) SKHY · SK hynix Inc. ADR (3) SMCI · Super Micro Computer Inc. (5) SMH · VanEck Semiconductor ETF (4) SNDK · Sandisk Corp. (4) SOXS · Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (3) SPCX · Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (3) TSLA · Tesla, Inc. (6) TSM · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. ADR (4) USAR · USA Rare Earth, Inc. (2)
Aperçu de la stratégie sélectionnée

DOC · Healthpeak Properties, Inc.

Stock Universe · marché actions mondial
USD · NYSE · XNYS · United States
DOC 0 +1155.86% 1TRAD-WHL1
Recommandé par DevioLab · Core 1 iChaque ticker — paire de cryptomonnaies ou action/ETF — peut avoir plusieurs stratégies avec des fréquences de transaction et des risques différents. Core 1 est la sélection principale et la plus équilibrée de DevioLab pour ce ticker : le système privilégie le contrôle du risque et des baisses. C’est le choix de départ privilégié. Vous pouvez aussi choisir une stratégie plus prudente ou agressive en comparant ses transactions et graphiques ci-dessous.
Recommandé par DevioLab · Core 2 iCore 2 est la sélection plus dynamique et agressive de DevioLab pour un ticker. Elle accepte un risque plus élevé et des baisses plus profondes pour un rendement potentiellement supérieur. Comparez les transactions et graphiques des différentes stratégies pour choisir votre profil.
58Transactions
82.8%Taux de réussite
+4.90%Transaction moyenne
+44.82%Meilleure transaction
-12.54%Pire transaction
+80.9%Annualisé
Profil analytique de la stratégie · beb079260f75ea06

Analyzing DOC Algorithmic Strategy: High-Win-Rate Multi-Week Trend Extraction for DOC Stock Trading Bots

This quantitative evaluation analyzes a top-ranked algorithmic trading strategy designed for DOC stock on a 15-minute execution chart. Generating a total cumulative return of 1,155.86% across 57 completed trades over a 6.94-year evaluation window, the strategy demonstrates an impressive 84.21% win rate, a profit factor of 5.00, and a tightly controlled maximum drawdown of 12.54%. By entering selectively and holding positions for an average of 570.58 hours (roughly 23.8 days), the strategy functions as a low-frequency, high-expectancy decision engine suitable for automated trading bots and trading agents seeking high signal accuracy and limited equity drawdowns.

Analyse au 20.10.2026. Les données de la stratégie sont mises à jour séparément.
Lire l’analyse complète

Strategy profile

The DOC algorithmic strategy evaluated here represents a core decision logic tailored for trading DOC stock. Ranked first overall for its asset ticker within the DevioLab database with an aggregate DevioLab score of 83.99, the strategy operates on a 15-minute timeframe. Despite using a granular intraday candlestick interval for signal evaluation, its historical execution profile is remarkably low-frequency and selective. Over a testing horizon spanning September 16, 2019 through August 24, 2026—totaling nearly 6.94 years—the model produced just 57 completed closed trades. This translates to an average of roughly 8.21 trades per year or 1.27 trades per active month. Across this entire period, the strategy accumulated a total closed return sum of 1,155.86%, yielding a calculated annualized return metric of 80.92%. Designed as an algorithmic model suitable for deployment within automated trading bots, trading robots, or quantitative trading agents, the core philosophy relies on patience, high signal filtering, and extended holding periods rather than high-turnover intraday scalp execution.

Trading rhythm and position duration

A critical structural characteristic of this strategy is the contrast between its 15-minute chart resolution and its multi-week position holding times. While signals are processed on 15-minute candles, the average position holding time reaches 570.58 hours, or approximately 23.77 days. The median holding duration stands at 330.50 hours, or roughly 13.77 days, indicating that while a few longer-running positions extend the mean duration, the baseline trade remains open for two to three weeks. Furthermore, the spacing between consecutive position exits averages 43.07 days, with a median exit interval of 29.49 days. This spacing confirms that the strategy is idle for substantial windows between market setups. Rather than overtrading during noise regimes, the logic holds cash until explicit quantitative conditions align. For automated trading agents and execution bots, this creates an operational environment with minimal execution friction, low transaction turnover, and ample time for order processing, contrasting sharply with high-frequency algorithms that suffer from execution drag.

Quality of historical results

The payoff architecture of the strategy reveals exceptional statistical consistency across its 57 trades. Of those positions, 48 ended in profit while only 9 resulted in losses, achieving a win rate of 84.21%. The average trade profit stands at +5.10%, closely tracking the median trade return of +4.58%. The proximity between the average and median trade return indicates that historical performance is not driven by extreme statistical noise or a single fortunate trade, but rather by a reproducible profit capture process. The strategy produced a best individual trade of +44.82% and a worst trade loss of -12.54%. Crucially, the top three winning trades combined represent 25.83% of total gross profit. Because less than twenty-six percent of profits are concentrated in the three largest gains, the remaining seventy-four percent of earnings is broadly distributed across the remaining 45 winning trades. Combined with a profit factor of 5.00—meaning total gross gains were five times larger than total gross losses—the historical payoff profile displays strong multi-trade expectancy.

Risk, drawdown and losing behavior

Risk containment is one of the strategy's primary analytical strengths. The maximum equity drawdown recorded throughout the nearly seven-year backtest was limited to 12.54%. Remarkably, this maximum drawdown exactly matches the magnitude of the single worst trade (-12.54%), illustrating that equity pullbacks were largely driven by isolated single-trade stop exits rather than compound multi-trade drawdowns. The risk architecture is further underscored by the streak statistics: the strategy achieved a peak winning streak of 15 consecutive positive trades, while its longest losing streak was limited to just 2 consecutive losses. With only 9 total losing trades across 57 historical cycles, losing events were infrequent and isolated. The combination of an 84.21% hit rate and a 5.00 profit factor allows the strategy to maintain a highly resilient equity curve, offering a favorable risk-to-reward structure for quantitative portfolios and trading robots designed to operate under strict drawdown constraints.

Behavior through time and yearly stability

An examination of the yearly performance breakdown demonstrates consistent multi-year profitability across various market cycles from 2020 through 2026. In 2020, the strategy recorded 12 trades (10 wins, 2 losses) for an 83.33% win rate and a cumulative return sum of +81.63%. In 2021, it completed 8 trades with a flawless 100% win rate, yielding +36.85%. Performance remained positive in 2022 with 6 trades (5 wins, 1 loss) adding +25.20%, followed by a quiet 2023 where 4 trades (3 wins, 1 loss) generated +4.92%. The strategy experienced its strongest output in 2024, executing 10 trades with 9 wins (90.00% win rate) to post a sum of +84.41%. In 2025, 8 trades (6 wins, 2 losses) produced +19.57%, and in 2026, 9 trades (7 wins, 2 losses) added +38.04%. Across every calendar year in the sample, the strategy maintained win rates at or above 75.00% and generated positive net returns, demonstrating that its signal logic is resilient across shifting broader market environments rather than dependent on a single favorable year.

Recent period since 2024-06-01 versus full history

Focusing on the recent evaluation window beginning June 1, 2024, provides vital insight into modern strategy behavior. Since this cutoff, 22 completed trades have closed, accounting for nearly 38.6% of all historical trades in the dataset. During this recent window, the sum of trade percentage gains reached +72.96%. The higher concentration of trades in recent years—22 closed exits between mid-2024 and mid-2026 compared to 35 trades in the prior five years—indicates increased market volatility or more frequent setup triggers in DOC stock during recent cycles. Crucially, the recent return contribution of +72.96% aligns cleanly with the overall historical average trade expectation, confirming that the logic has retained its performance integrity in recent market conditions without experiencing parameter decay or signal degradation.

Strengths and limitations

The primary strength of this DOC strategy lies in its outstanding trade efficiency and risk metrics, characterized by an 84.21% win rate, a 5.00 profit factor, and a capped 12.54% historical drawdown. Its low concentration in top winners (25.83%) confirms that performance is well distributed across trades. Furthermore, its long average holding duration of 570.58 hours minimizes sensitivity to short-term spread fluctuations and operational slippage, making it highly practical for automated trading bots. Conversely, the strategy's primary limitation is its sample size and trade frequency. Generating only 57 completed trades over almost seven years means statistical sample sizes per year are small (ranging from 4 to 12 trades). Investors utilizing this decision engine must exercise patience, as long idle periods between trade entries—averaging over 40 days between exits—require disciplined long-term capital allocation rather than frequent trading activity.

DevioLab analytical conclusion

The DOC 0 +1155.86% 1TRAD-WHL1 strategy demonstrates superior quantitative characteristics, earning its top rank for DOC stock with a DevioLab score of 83.99. By pairing 15-minute signal evaluation with a multi-week position holding methodology, the model effectively filters out noise to capture substantial underlying price movements in DOC stock. The alignment of an 84.21% win rate, an 80.92% annualized return metric, and a modest 12.54% maximum drawdown makes this strategy an exemplary candidate logic for quantitative systems, trading robots, and automated trading agents seeking steady growth with controlled downside exposure. While low trade frequency demands high patience, the historical statistical profile shows high structural reliability.

Data scope and methodology

All analytical conclusions presented in this article are derived exclusively from historical backtested execution data for DOC stock on a 15-minute time interval from September 16, 2019 to August 24, 2026. The dataset encompasses 57 completed closed trade cycles. Summed closed trade percentages, win rates, drawdowns, and holding durations reflect mathematical calculations based strictly on closed historical signals. These statistics represent hypothetical historical performance research designed to evaluate strategy logic for automated execution systems and do not represent live account trading returns or guaranteed future performance. Real-world execution results may vary due to market liquidity, slippage, broker fees, and dynamic trading conditions.

Analyse complète de la stratégie