Chargement du statut du marché boursier américain…
➜
COMMENT DÉMARRER
Terminez la configuration complète du système en quelques minutes.
Ouvrir le guide de démarrage rapide →
Catalogue public · DEVIOLAB

CATALOGUE DE STRATÉGIES

Explorez les stratégies algorithmiques, comparez leurs performances et ouvrez l’historique complet de chaque modèle.
Chaque stratégie algorithmique correspond à un agent de trading réel (Trading Bot) créé par l’équipe DevioLab à partir de tests sur données historiques. Elle peut être utilisée pour le trading automatisé via API sur les plateformes prises en charge, notamment Binance, ou uniquement comme Signal Bot avec notifications Telegram et email.
2 · Ticker
⌕
FILTRES
Toutes les conditions sélectionnées fonctionnent ensemble
Filtres des secteurs et groupes
DISPONIBILITÉ SUR LES PLATEFORMES
A · Agilent Technologies Inc. (4) AAOI · Applied Optoelectronics Inc. (5) AAPL · Apple Inc. (7) ABBV · AbbVie Inc. (4) ABNB · Airbnb Inc. (4) ABT · Abbott Laboratories (4) ACGL · Arch Capital Group Ltd. (4) ACN · Accenture PLC Class A (4) ADBE · Adobe Inc. (3) ADI · Analog Devices Inc. (4) ADM · Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (4) ADP · Automatic Data Processing Inc. (4) ADSK · Autodesk Inc. (4) AEE · Ameren Corporation (4) AEP · American Electric Power Company, Inc. (4) AES · The AES Corporation (3) AFL · Aflac Incorporated (4) AIG · American International Group, Inc. (4) AIZ · Assurant Inc. (4) AJG · Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (4) AKAM · Akamai Technologies Inc. (4) ALAB · Astera Labs, Inc. (7) ALB · Albemarle Corporation (4) ALGN · Align Technology Inc. (4) ALL · The Allstate Corporation (4) ALLE · Allegion plc (4) ALNY · Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (4) AMAT · Applied Materials Inc. (7) AMCR · Amcor plc (4) AMD · Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (7) AME · AMETEK, Inc. (4) AMGN · Amgen Inc. (2) AMP · Ameriprise Financial Inc. (4) AMT · American Tower Corporation (4) AMZN · Amazon.com Inc. (7) ANET · Arista Networks Inc. (4) AON · Aon plc Class A (4) AOS · A. O. Smith Corporation (4) APA · APA Corporation (4) APD · Air Products and Chemicals Inc. (4) APH · Amphenol Corp. (4) APO · Apollo Global Management Inc. (4) APP · AppLovin Corporation (4) APTV · Aptiv PLC (4) ARE · Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (4) ARES · Ares Management Corp. (4) ARM · Arm Holdings plc ADR (7) ASML · ASML Holding N.V. NY (7) ASTS · AST SpaceMobile Inc. (6) ATO · Atmos Energy Corporation (4) AVGO · Broadcom Inc. (7) AVY · Avery Dennison Corporation (4) AWK · American Water Works Company, Inc. (4) AXON · Axon Enterprise, Inc. (4) AXP · American Express Company (4) AZO · AutoZone, Inc. (4) BA · Boeing Co/The (4) BABA · Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. ADR (6) BAC · Bank of America Corp. (4) BALL · Ball Corporation (4) BAX · Baxter International Inc. (4) BBY · Best Buy Co., Inc. (4) BDX · Becton, Dickinson and Company (4) BE · Bloom Energy Corp. (5) BEN · Franklin Templeton Inc. (4) BF.B · Brown-Forman Corp. (4) BG · Bunge Global SA (4) BIIB · Biogen Inc. (4) BK · The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (4) BKNG · Booking Holdings Inc. (4) BKR · Baker Hughes Company (4) BLDR · Builders FirstSource Inc. (3) BLK · BlackRock Inc. (4) BMNR · BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (5) BMY · Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (3) BNY · Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (3) BR · Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (4) BRK.B · Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B (4) BRO · Brown & Brown Inc. (4) BSX · Boston Scientific Corp. (3) BX · Blackstone Inc. (4) BXP · BXP, Inc. (4) C · Citigroup Inc. (4) CAH · Cardinal Health Inc. (4) CARR · Carrier Global Corp. (4) CASY · Casey's General Stores, Inc. (4) CAT · Caterpillar Inc. (4) CB · Chubb Limited (4) CBOE · Cboe Global Markets Inc. (4) CBRE · CBRE Group Inc. (4) CCEP · Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (4) CCI · Crown Castle Inc. (4) CCL · Carnival Corporation Ltd. (4) CDNS · Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (4) CDW · CDW Corporation (3) CEG · Constellation Energy Corporation (4) CF · CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (4) CFG · Citizens Financial Group Inc. (4) CHD · Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (4) CHRW · C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. (4) CHTR · Charter Communications Inc. (4) CI · The Cigna Group (4) CIEN · Ciena Corporation (4) CINF · Cincinnati Financial Corporation (3) CL · Colgate-Palmolive Co. (4) CLX · The Clorox Company (4) CMCSA · Comcast Corp. (4) CME · CME Group Inc. (4) CMG · Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (4) CMI · Cummins Inc. (4) CMS · CMS Energy Corporation (3) CNC · Centene Corp. (4) CNP · CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (4) COF · Capital One Financial Corp. (4) COHR · Coherent Corp. (7) COIN · Coinbase Global Inc. (3) COO · The Cooper Companies, Inc. (3) COP · ConocoPhillips (4) COR · Cencora Inc. (4) COST · Costco Wholesale Corporation (4) CPAY · Corpay Inc. (4) CPRT · Copart, Inc. (4) CPT · Camden Property Trust (4) CRCL · Circle Internet Group Inc. (5) CRDO · Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (8) CRH · CRH plc (4) CRL · Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (4) CRM · Salesforce, Inc. (4) CRWD · CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (4) CSCO · Cisco Systems Inc. (4) CSGP · CoStar Group, Inc. (4) CSX · CSX Corporation (4) CTAS · Cintas Corporation (4) CTSH · Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. (3) CTVA · Corteva Inc. (4) DELL · Dell Technologies Inc. (6) EWY · iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (6) FLNC · Fluence Energy, Inc. (7) GS · The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (6) HOOD · Robinhood Markets Inc. (7) IBM · International Business Machines Corporation (6) INTC · Intel Corporation (6) IREN · IREN Limited (7) LITE · Lumentum Holdings Inc. (6) META · Meta Platforms Inc. (7) MRVL · Marvell Technology, Inc. (6) MSFT · Microsoft Corporation (7) MSTR · Strategy Inc. (7) MU · Micron Technology Inc. (7) NFLX · Netflix Inc. (8) NOK · Nokia Corporation Sponsored ADR (7) NVDA · NVIDIA Corporation (7) PLTR · Palantir Technologies Inc. (7) PYPL · PayPal Holdings, Inc. (6) QQQ · Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (6) RKLB · Rocket Lab Corporation (4) SKHY · SK hynix Inc. ADR (3) SMCI · Super Micro Computer Inc. (6) SMH · VanEck Semiconductor ETF (4) SNDK · Sandisk Corp. (4) SOXS · Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (3) SPCX · Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (3) TSLA · Tesla, Inc. (6) TSM · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. ADR (5) USAR · USA Rare Earth, Inc. (3)
Aperçu de la stratégie sélectionnée

ARE · Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.

Stock Universe · marché actions mondial
USD · NYSE · XNYS · United States
ARE 0 +1076.02% 1TRAD-YVT7
Recommandé par DevioLab · Core 1 iRecommandation principale de DevioLab : un profil plus protégé, plus régulier et plus stable, centré sur le contrôle du risque et du drawdown.
Recommandé par DevioLab · Core 2 iRecommandation plus agressive de DevioLab : accepte un risque plus élevé et des drawdowns plus profonds en échange de rendements potentiellement supérieurs.
71Transactions
83.1%Taux de réussite
+3.67%Transaction moyenne
+25.52%Meilleure transaction
-14.39%Pire transaction
+117.0%Annualisé
Profil analytique de la stratégie · dbe5c4a7dd989056

Quantitative Evaluation of ARE Trading Strategy: High Precision and Multi-Day Holding on 15-Minute Chart Structure

This empirical study analyzes an algorithmic trading strategy evaluated on the stock ticker ARE over a 6.93-year backtest horizon from September 2019 to August 2026. Designed as decision logic suitable for automated trading bots and trading agents operating on a 15-minute execution timeframe, the model demonstrates a selective, low-frequency position-taking approach. Across 70 completed trades, the strategy achieved an 84.29% win rate, a profit factor of 8.75, and a cumulative closed-trade return of +1076.02%, while restricting its historical maximum drawdown to 9.66%. The empirical footprint reveals extended multi-day position durations averaging 271.10 hours (~11.3 days) combined with long intervals between trade exits, producing an exceptionally low dependence on outlier winners.

Analyse au 18.09.2026. Les données de la stratégie sont mises à jour séparément.
Lire l’analyse complète

1. Strategy profile

The evaluated algorithmic model for ARE operates on a 15-minute candle structure within the stock market asset class, serving as automated decision logic for trading robots and quantitative execution engines. Over a historical backtesting window spanning 6.93 years between September 16, 2019, and August 19, 2026, the strategy generated a total of 70 completed trade cycles. This modest trade count highlights a highly selective filtration process that bypasses short-term noise in favor of specific price configurations. The model achieved a total cumulative return of +1076.02%, translating to an annualized return metric of 153.77%. It currently holds the top DevioLab rank (Rank 1) for the ARE ticker with a quantitative score of 87.07, designated as a core independent strategy. By prioritizing selective entry conditions on lower timeframe data, the strategy combines structural precision with low transaction frequency.

2. Trading rhythm and position duration

Despite operating on a 15-minute timeframe, the strategy exhibits an extended holding profile rather than high-frequency intraday behavior. The average holding duration per position is 271.10 hours (approximately 11.3 days), with a median holding time of 195.88 hours (roughly 8.2 days). This demonstrates that while entries ARE refined using 15-minute granularity, positions ARE allowed to develop across multiple calendar weeks. Exit frequency is similarly deliberate: the model records an average of 34.20 days between trade exits and a median of 25.04 days between exits, yielding an annual turnover rate of approximately 10.11 trades per year (or 1.35 trades per active month). For automated trading bots deployed in live environments, this structural rhythm implies low operational overhead and minimal exposure to microstructural execution noise, as trade events ARE separated by substantial calm periods.

3. Quality of historical results

The structural quality of the historical performance is characterized by high win consistency and balanced payoff distribution. Out of 70 historical trades, 59 were profitable and 11 resulted in losses, establishing a win rate of 84.29%. The strategy generated an average trade return of +3.93% against a median trade return of +3.20%, indicating that historical profitability is broadly distributed across standard trade setups rather than skewed by extreme tail outcomes. The profit factor stands at 8.75, supported by a maximum winning trade of +25.52% and a worst trade of -9.66%. Furthermore, the top three winning trades collectively account for only 19.29% of gross historical profit. This relatively low winner concentration confirms that overall equity curve growth was built upon a broad sequence of moderate gains rather than dependence on a few isolated market surges.

4. Risk, drawdown and losing behavior

Risk metrics across the 6.93-year dataset indicate strict loss containment relative to cumulative gain. The strategy recorded a maximum peak-to-trough drawdown of 9.66%, which exactly matches the magnitude of its single worst closed trade (-9.66%). This alignment suggests that major historical drawdowns were predominantly driven by individual adverse trade exits rather than compounding sequences of severe losses. The strategy's longest losing streak was capped at just 2 consecutive trades, compAREd to a longest winning streak of 17 consecutive closed trades. This asymmetrical streak profile reflects rapid risk mitigation during adverse market conditions. However, because position durations regularly stretch past 10 days, open positions remain subject to multi-day market gaps and broader stock market regime shifts while trades remain active.

5. Behavior through time and yearly stability

Annual distribution of trade results demonstrates multi-year consistency across varying equity market environments. In 2020, the strategy produced 8 winning trades out of 8 (+33.23% sum). In 2021, it recorded 9 trades with an 88.89% win rate (+28.68% sum), followed by 13 trades in 2022 with a 76.92% win rate (+37.86% sum). Profitability expanded in 2023 with 9 trades and an 88.89% win rate (+41.37% sum) and continued into 2024 with 12 trades and a 91.67% win rate (+38.14% sum). The strategy experienced its sole negative calendar year in 2025, recording 5 wins and 5 losses (50.00% win rate) with a modest return sum of -5.89%. It rebounded sharply in 2026, delivering 9 wins out of 9 trades (100.00% win rate) and a cumulative sum of +101.59%. This historical progression illustrates sustained performance, with a single muted contraction year followed by strong structural recovery.

6. Recent period since 2024-06-01 versus full history

Examining performance metrics from June 1, 2024, onward offers insight into recent strategy behavior under contemporary market conditions. During this recent window, the strategy completed 24 trades, generating a sum of closed trade returns of +106.83%. Accounting for over a third of the strategy's total historical trade volume (24 out of 70 trades), this period demonstrates sustained entry frequency and strong return capture. Comparing this recent trajectory to the complete history reveals that the core statistical traits—specifically high win probability and effective risk containment—remained active through recent market cycles. The sample size of 24 completed trades since mid-2024 provides a robust statistical baseline confirming that the model's short-term execution behavior aligns closely with its multi-year profile.

7. Strengths and limitations

The primary analytical strengths of this ARE strategy include an exceptional win rate (84.29%), a high profit factor (8.75), a modest maximum drawdown (9.66%), and low profit concentration (top 3 trades contributing under 20% of gross gains). The prolonged average holding duration (~11.3 days) minimizes trade frequency, making it suitable for automated trading agents designed to execute without high-frequency churn. The primary statistical limitation lies in the small total trade sample size (70 completed trades across nearly 7 years). An average of ~10 trades per year means that statistical confidence accumulates slowly over time. Additionally, holding positions across multi-week horizons exposes capital to overnight equity gap risk and earnings announcement volatility that cannot be managed on intraday execution alone.

8. DevioLab analytical conclusion

The quantitative evaluation assigns this ARE strategy a DevioLab score of 87.07, ranking it first among available strategies for this asset. The combination of strong profit factor metrics, low maximum drawdown, and minimal winner concentration highlights a robust quantitative profile. Automated trading bots implementing this decision logic benefit from a selective filtering framework that favors trade quality over trade volume. While the historical 84.29% hit rate and low drawdown profile ARE compelling, potential operators must recognize that extended holding periods require patience during low-turnover phases, and past backtested performance does not guarantee future results across evolving stock market regimes.

9. Data scope and methodology

This analysis is based strictly on historical backtested performance data compiled for the ARE ticker on a 15-minute timeframe from September 16, 2019, through August 19, 2026. All reported metrics, including percentage returns, profit factors, holding durations, and drawdown values, reflect simulated closed trade outputs generated by the algorithmic model logic. Slippage, exchange fees, borrowing costs, and corporate action adjustments ARE not factored into these closed-trade calculations unless explicitly stated. Historical statistical outcomes serve exclusively for analytical evaluation of strategy design and do not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or guarantees of future trading performance.

Analyse complète de la stratégie