Chargement du statut du marché boursier américain…
COMMENT DÉMARRER
Terminez la configuration complète du système en quelques minutes.
Ouvrir le guide de démarrage rapide
Catalogue public · DEVIOLAB

CATALOGUE DE STRATÉGIES

Explorez les stratégies algorithmiques, comparez leurs performances et ouvrez l’historique complet de chaque modèle.
Vous ne savez pas par où commencer ?
1. Catalogue 2. Choisissez Core 1 3. Ajouter au panier 4. Clés API 5. Activer le bot de trading
Notre recommandation : pour votre première configuration, utilisez Core 1 : c’est la sélection principale et la plus protégée de DevioLab. Core 2 est destiné aux utilisateurs qui acceptent consciemment un risque plus élevé et des drawdowns plus profonds.
i
Que sont Core 1 et Core 2 ?
DevioLab analyse les stratégies crypto et boursières et crée des sélections prêtes à l’emploi afin que vous n’ayez pas à parcourir manuellement des centaines d’options.
★ Core 1
Une sélection DevioLab de stratégies crypto et actions recommandée comme choix principal, plus équilibré et protégé pour commencer, avec un accent sur le contrôle du risque et du drawdown.
◆ Core 2
Une sélection DevioLab distincte et plus agressive pour les utilisateurs qui acceptent consciemment un risque plus élevé et des drawdowns plus profonds en échange d’un rendement potentiellement supérieur.
AAOI · Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. (5) AAPL · Apple Inc. (7) ALAB · Astera Labs, Inc. (6) AMAT · Applied Materials, Inc. (6) AMD · Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (7) AMZN · Amazon.com, Inc. (6) ARM · Arm Holdings plc (5) ASML · ASML Holding N.V. (7) ASTS · AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (6) AVGO · Broadcom Inc. (6) BABA · Alibaba Group Holding Limited (6) BE · Bloom Energy Corporation (5) BMNR · BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (5) COHR · Coherent Corp. (5) CRCL · Circle Internet Group, Inc. (5) CRDO · Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (8) DELL · Dell Technologies Inc. (6) EWY · iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (6) FLNC · Fluence Energy, Inc. (7) GS · The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (6) HOOD · Robinhood Markets, Inc. (7) IBM · International Business Machines Corporation (6) INTC · Intel Corporation (6) IREN · IREN Limited (7) LITE · Lumentum Holdings Inc. (6) META · Meta Platforms, Inc. (7) MRVL · Marvell Technology, Inc. (6) MSFT · Microsoft Corporation (7) MSTR · Strategy Inc (8) MU · Micron Technology, Inc. (7) NFLX · Netflix, Inc. (7) NOK · Nokia Oyj (7) NVDA · NVIDIA Corporation (7) PLTR · Palantir Technologies Inc. (8) PYPL · PayPal Holdings, Inc. (5) QQQ · Invesco QQQ Trust (6) RKLB · Rocket Lab Corporation (4) SKHY · SK hynix Inc. (3) SMCI · Super Micro Computer, Inc. (5) SMH · VanEck Semiconductor ETF (4) SNDK · Sandisk Corporation (4) SOXS · Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (3) SPCX · Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (3) TSLA · Tesla, Inc. (6) TSM · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (4) USAR · USA Rare Earth, Inc. (4)
Aperçu de la stratégie sélectionnée

BABABUSDT

Instrument boursier · exécution via Binance
BABAB 0 +3852.13% 1TRAD-RBA3
Recommandé par DevioLab · Core 1 iRecommandation principale de DevioLab : un profil plus protégé, plus régulier et plus stable, centré sur le contrôle du risque et du drawdown.
Recommandé par DevioLab · Core 2 iRecommandation plus agressive de DevioLab : accepte un risque plus élevé et des drawdowns plus profonds en échange de rendements potentiellement supérieurs.
226Transactions
69.0%Taux de réussite
+1.81%Transaction moyenne
+19.62%Meilleure transaction
-18.55%Pire transaction
+278.4%Annualisé
Profil analytique de la stratégie · 821359b5c00348ef

BABA · Alibaba Group Holding Limited: Quantitative Analysis of a 15-Minute Algorithmic Strategy

An analytical study of an algorithmic trading system applied to Alibaba Group Holding Limited on the 15-minute timeframe. Based on nearly seven years of historical data covering 225 closed trades, the strategy demonstrates a profit factor of 2.50 and controlled equity drawdowns.

Lire l’analyse complète

Strategy profile

This algorithmic trading model is tailored for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (ticker BABA) operating on the 15-minute interval. Within the DevioLab quantitative evaluation framework, the strategy achieved a score of 78.79, ranking 2nd among all evaluated algorithms for this equity ticker. The historical evaluation spans 6.92 years from September 16, 2019, to August 18, 2026. The algorithm focuses on capturing short-to-medium price imbalances on intraday movements without over-trading. By seeking high-probability entry setups, the model accumulates steady returns over time rather than relying on aggressive exposure.

Trading rhythm and position duration

Across the full dataset of nearly seven years, the algorithm generated 225 completed trades, translating to an average trading frequency of approximately 32.5 trades per year. This highlights a highly selective entry system that avoids market noise and executes trades only when specific statistical parameters are satisfied. While specific metrics for holding hours and days between exits are not recorded in the source dataset, the rate of roughly two to three trades per month reflects a patient posture. The strategy is not a scalping model; its moderate frequency minimizes trading friction, execution drag, and transaction costs.

Quality of historical results

The historical performance reveals strong consistency across the trade sample. Out of 225 completed trades, 155 were profitable, establishing a win rate of 68.89%. The strategy achieved a overall profit factor of 2.50, demonstrating a solid margin of gross gains relative to gross losses. The total cumulative historical return reached 3852.13%, which translates to an annualized return of 275.02%. The average trade yielded 1.81%, while the median trade stood slightly higher at 2.06%. Notably, the top 3 winning trades generated only 7.40% of total gross profits, proving that performance is broadly distributed across the dataset rather than driven by extreme outliers.

Risk, drawdown and losing behavior

The maximum historical equity drawdown was restricted to 21.12%. For single-stock trading in a volatile instrument such as Alibaba Group Holding Limited, maintaining drawdowns near this level points to effective risk parameters. The worst single trade resulted in a loss of -18.55%, compared to a peak winning trade of 19.62%. The model also demonstrated steady streak resilience: its longest winning streak reached 8 consecutive trades, whereas its longest losing streak was capped at 4 consecutive trades.

Behavior through time and yearly stability

Over the 6.92-year period, the model navigated various macroeconomic regimes and structural trend shifts in BABA. By maintaining a disciplined regime of 32.5 trades per year, the strategy avoids overtrading during choppy or unfavorable market environments. Granular yearly breakdowns are not provided in the source dataset. However, the overarching statistical metrics indicate that the strategy maintained a positive expectancy across the full timeline through selective signal filters.

Strengths and limitations

Key strengths of this model include a strong 68.89% win rate, a robust profit factor of 2.50, and a contained maximum drawdown of 21.12%. Furthermore, the low concentration of gross profits in the top 3 trades (7.40%) confirms healthy return distribution. The primary limitation lies in the modest sample size of 225 trades over nearly seven years. Investors must also be prepared for extended periods of inactivity, as demonstrated by the zero trades recorded since June 2024.

DevioLab analytical conclusion

Scoring 78.79 and ranking 2nd for BABA, this 15-minute algorithmic strategy provides a well-structured balance between high win accuracy and controlled drawdown risk. It represents a disciplined quantitative approach to trading equity volatility. While historical backtest metrics demonstrate a clear statistical edge, past performance is purely analytical and does not guarantee future results. Traders should evaluate the low trade frequency and inactive periods within their broader portfolio context.

Data scope and methodology

This analysis is derived from simulated closed trades on spot BABA stock data spanning September 16, 2019, to August 18, 2026. All percentage metrics reflect historical simulated closed performance. These statistics do not represent actual live brokerage execution or guarantee future returns. This document is provided strictly for educational and quantitative research purposes and does not constitute investment advice.

Analyse complète de la stratégie