Cargando el estado del mercado bursátil de EE. UU.…
➜
CÓMO EMPEZAR
Completa toda la configuración del sistema en solo unos minutos.
Abrir guía de inicio rápido →
Catálogo público · DEVIOLAB

CATÁLOGO DE ESTRATEGIAS

Explora estrategias algorítmicas, compara su rendimiento y abre el historial completo de cada modelo.
Cada estrategia algorítmica corresponde a un agente de trading real (Trading Bot) creado por el equipo de DevioLab a partir de pruebas con datos históricos. Puede utilizarse para trading automatizado mediante API en plataformas compatibles, incluida Binance, o solo como Signal Bot con avisos por Telegram y email.
2 · Ticker
⌕
FILTROS
Todas las condiciones seleccionadas funcionan juntas
Filtros de sectores y grupos
DISPONIBILIDAD EN BOLSAS
A · Agilent Technologies Inc. (4) AAOI · Applied Optoelectronics Inc. (5) AAPL · Apple Inc. (7) ABBV · AbbVie Inc. (4) ABNB · Airbnb Inc. (4) ABT · Abbott Laboratories (4) ACGL · Arch Capital Group Ltd. (4) ACN · Accenture PLC Class A (4) ADBE · Adobe Inc. (3) ADI · Analog Devices Inc. (4) ADM · Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (4) ADP · Automatic Data Processing Inc. (4) ADSK · Autodesk Inc. (4) AEE · Ameren Corporation (4) AEP · American Electric Power Company, Inc. (4) AES · The AES Corporation (3) AFL · Aflac Incorporated (4) AIG · American International Group, Inc. (4) AIZ · Assurant Inc. (4) AJG · Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (4) AKAM · Akamai Technologies Inc. (4) ALAB · Astera Labs, Inc. (7) ALB · Albemarle Corporation (4) ALGN · Align Technology Inc. (4) ALL · The Allstate Corporation (4) ALLE · Allegion plc (4) ALNY · Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (4) AMAT · Applied Materials Inc. (7) AMCR · Amcor plc (4) AMD · Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (7) AME · AMETEK, Inc. (4) AMGN · Amgen Inc. (2) AMP · Ameriprise Financial Inc. (4) AMT · American Tower Corporation (4) AMZN · Amazon.com Inc. (7) ANET · Arista Networks Inc. (4) AON · Aon plc Class A (4) AOS · A. O. Smith Corporation (4) APA · APA Corporation (4) APD · Air Products and Chemicals Inc. (4) APH · Amphenol Corp. (4) APO · Apollo Global Management Inc. (4) APP · AppLovin Corporation (4) APTV · Aptiv PLC (4) ARE · Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (4) ARES · Ares Management Corp. (4) ARM · Arm Holdings plc ADR (7) ASML · ASML Holding N.V. NY (7) ASTS · AST SpaceMobile Inc. (6) ATO · Atmos Energy Corporation (4) AVGO · Broadcom Inc. (7) AVY · Avery Dennison Corporation (4) AWK · American Water Works Company, Inc. (4) AXON · Axon Enterprise, Inc. (4) AXP · American Express Company (4) AZO · AutoZone, Inc. (4) BA · Boeing Co/The (4) BABA · Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. ADR (6) BAC · Bank of America Corp. (4) BALL · Ball Corporation (4) BAX · Baxter International Inc. (4) BBY · Best Buy Co., Inc. (4) BDX · Becton, Dickinson and Company (4) BE · Bloom Energy Corp. (5) BEN · Franklin Templeton Inc. (4) BF.B · Brown-Forman Corp. (4) BG · Bunge Global SA (4) BIIB · Biogen Inc. (4) BK · The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (4) BKNG · Booking Holdings Inc. (4) BKR · Baker Hughes Company (4) BLDR · Builders FirstSource Inc. (3) BLK · BlackRock Inc. (4) BMNR · BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (5) BMY · Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (3) BNY · Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (3) BR · Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (4) BRK.B · Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B (4) BRO · Brown & Brown Inc. (4) BSX · Boston Scientific Corp. (3) BX · Blackstone Inc. (4) BXP · BXP, Inc. (4) C · Citigroup Inc. (4) CAH · Cardinal Health Inc. (4) CARR · Carrier Global Corp. (4) CASY · Casey's General Stores, Inc. (4) CAT · Caterpillar Inc. (4) CB · Chubb Limited (4) CBOE · Cboe Global Markets Inc. (4) CBRE · CBRE Group Inc. (4) CCEP · Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (4) CCI · Crown Castle Inc. (4) CCL · Carnival Corporation Ltd. (4) CDNS · Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (4) CDW · CDW Corporation (3) CEG · Constellation Energy Corporation (4) CF · CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (4) CFG · Citizens Financial Group Inc. (4) CHD · Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (4) CHRW · C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. (4) CHTR · Charter Communications Inc. (4) CI · The Cigna Group (4) CIEN · Ciena Corporation (4) CINF · Cincinnati Financial Corporation (3) CL · Colgate-Palmolive Co. (4) CLX · The Clorox Company (4) CMCSA · Comcast Corp. (4) CME · CME Group Inc. (4) CMG · Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (4) CMI · Cummins Inc. (4) CMS · CMS Energy Corporation (3) CNC · Centene Corp. (4) CNP · CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (4) COF · Capital One Financial Corp. (4) COHR · Coherent Corp. (7) COIN · Coinbase Global Inc. (3) COO · The Cooper Companies, Inc. (3) COP · ConocoPhillips (4) COR · Cencora Inc. (4) COST · Costco Wholesale Corporation (4) CPAY · Corpay Inc. (4) CPRT · Copart, Inc. (4) CPT · Camden Property Trust (4) CRCL · Circle Internet Group Inc. (5) CRDO · Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (8) CRH · CRH plc (4) CRL · Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (4) CRM · Salesforce, Inc. (4) CRWD · CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (4) CSCO · Cisco Systems Inc. (4) CSGP · CoStar Group, Inc. (4) CSX · CSX Corporation (4) CTAS · Cintas Corporation (4) CTSH · Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. (3) CTVA · Corteva Inc. (4) DELL · Dell Technologies Inc. (6) EWY · iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (6) FLNC · Fluence Energy, Inc. (7) GS · The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (6) HOOD · Robinhood Markets Inc. (7) IBM · International Business Machines Corporation (6) INTC · Intel Corporation (6) IREN · IREN Limited (7) LITE · Lumentum Holdings Inc. (6) META · Meta Platforms Inc. (7) MRVL · Marvell Technology, Inc. (6) MSFT · Microsoft Corporation (7) MSTR · Strategy Inc. (7) MU · Micron Technology Inc. (7) NFLX · Netflix Inc. (8) NOK · Nokia Corporation Sponsored ADR (7) NVDA · NVIDIA Corporation (7) PLTR · Palantir Technologies Inc. (7) PYPL · PayPal Holdings, Inc. (6) QQQ · Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (6) RKLB · Rocket Lab Corporation (4) SKHY · SK hynix Inc. ADR (3) SMCI · Super Micro Computer Inc. (6) SMH · VanEck Semiconductor ETF (4) SNDK · Sandisk Corp. (4) SOXS · Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (3) SPCX · Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (3) TSLA · Tesla, Inc. (6) TSM · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. ADR (5) USAR · USA Rare Earth, Inc. (3)
Resumen de la estrategia seleccionada

CTVA · Corteva Inc.

Stock Universe · mercado bursátil global
USD · NYSE · XNYS · United States
CTVA 0 +2002.22% 1TRAD-MHM1
35Operaciones
80.0%Tasa de acierto
+10.55%Operación media
+112.59%Mejor operación
-4.03%Peor operación
+241.8%Anualizado
Perfil analítico de la estrategia · e65b268a30b2e57b

CTVA Algorithmic Strategy Analysis: High Payoff Asymmetry and Controlled Drawdown in Low-Frequency Stock Trading

This quantitative research report evaluates the performance profile of the top-ranked CTVA algorithmic trading strategy on DevioLab.com. Operating across a seven-year historical dataset on a 15-minute chart evaluation interval, the strategy delivers a total return of +2002.22% with an annualized return of 241.83% and a DevioLab score of 80.53. Defined by extreme selectivity, the algorithm completes just 35 trades over 7.08 years while maintaining an 80% win rate and a maximum drawdown capped at 5.00%. Our analysis explores how long position durations, strong payoff ratios, and low trade frequency interact to shape risk and return characteristics suitable for deployment in automated trading bots, trading robots, and quantitative trading agents.

Análisis al 13.10.2026. Los datos de la estrategia se actualizan por separado.
Leer análisis completo

Strategy profile

The CTVA algorithmic trading strategy occupies the top position in the DevioLab ranking for CTVA stock, achieving a score of 80.53. Built upon a 15-minute timeframe interval, the system exhibits a highly selective operational architecture designed to capture substantial intermediate trends while filtering out market noise. Over a simulated execution horizon spanning September 16, 2019, through October 13, 2026—a duration of approximately 7.08 years—the strategy executed a total of 35 completed trades. Despite evaluating market data on a granular 15-minute bar frequency, the algorithm operates with low turnover, generating an average of only 4.95 completed trades per year. This structural dynamic demonstrates that the underlying decision logic utilizes 15-minute price action primarily for precise entry positioning and exit execution rather than high-frequency churn. Across the full historical sample, the system achieved a total cumulative profit of +2002.22%, representing an annualized return of 241.83%. Designed as automated logic capable of driving trading bots, trading robots, or autonomous trading agents, the strategy emphasizes asymmetric payoff structures and capital preservation, yielding 28 winning trades against 7 losing trades for an overall win rate of 80.00%.

Trading rhythm and position duration

A defining characteristic of this strategy is the stark contrast between its short evaluation interval (15 minutes) and its multi-week position holding periods. The average holding duration per trade stands at 1020.91 hours, which translates to approximately 42.5 days. The median holding duration is 432.50 hours, or roughly 18 days. This positive skew between median and average holding times reveals that while typical positions remain active for roughly two to three weeks, a subset of high-conviction winning trades is held for several months to fully extract major price moves. The spatial distribution of trade exits is similarly sparse, with an average of 71.85 days between trade closures and a median inter-exit period of 43.61 days. On an active monthly basis, the strategy completes approximately 1.09 trades per month. Rather than continually re-entering the market, the algorithm spends extended periods holding existing positions or remaining in cash. For automated trading agents and trading robots, this structural cadence minimizes exposure to intraday spread costs and execution friction, allowing portfolio capital to remain committed to multi-week market swings.

Quality of historical results

The strategy exhibits remarkable payoff efficiency, evidenced by a profit factor of 3.75. Across 35 completed positions, 28 were closed at a profit while 7 incurred losses. The average trade yield across all historical events is +10.55%, compared to a median trade return of +6.35%. This relationship underscores a healthy return distribution: the strategy consistently generates solid baseline gains on typical winning trades while allowing exceptional trades to run significantly further. The single best trade achieved a remarkable gain of +112.59%, whereas the worst trade was held to a limited loss of -4.03%. Analysis of profit concentration shows that the three largest winning trades generated 44.35% of the total gross profit. While a 44.35% top-three profit concentration indicates a material dependence on outlier trend events, this reliance is balanced by a high win rate (80.00%) and a positive median trade return. The dynamic suggests that the system's overall profitability is supported both by frequent moderate gains and by occasional high-magnitude breakout trends.

Risk, drawdown and losing behavior

Risk management metrics represent one of the most compelling aspects of this strategy's historical record. The maximum peak-to-trough drawdown recorded across the entire 7.08-year history was strictly limited to 5.00%. This low drawdown profile is particularly notable given the strategy's total cumulative return of +2002.22%. The maximum worst individual trade loss of -4.03% confirms that the exit logic enforces tight loss boundaries, preventing adverse market moves from causing deep capital degradation. In terms of trade sequences, the strategy experienced a maximum winning streak of 16 consecutive profitable trades, compared to a maximum losing streak of just 3 consecutive losses. The combination of a high win rate (80.00%), capped loss severity (-4.03% max loss), and shallow drawdown (5.00%) indicates that historical equity pullbacks were brief and mild. For quantitative portfolio managers deploying trading bots or automated execution algorithms, this profile suggests low historical equity curve volatility, though extended position holding times still subject open capital to market overnight risk.

Behavior through time and yearly stability

Examining the strategy's yearly performance breakdown reveals consistent profitability across every calendar year represented in the dataset, albeit with varying trade frequencies and return magnitudes. In 2020, the system completed 2 trades (1 win, 1 loss) for a net return of +22.90% and a 50.00% win rate. In 2021, trade count rose to 3 (2 wins, 1 loss), generating +110.19% total return with a 66.67% win rate. The year 2022 marked an increase in activity with 8 trades (7 wins, 1 loss), producing +79.35% with an 87.50% win rate. In 2023, 6 trades were executed (3 wins, 3 losses), yielding +9.40% at a 50.00% win rate, reflecting a more challenging market environment where half the trades resulted in minor losses. Activity remained steady through 2024 with 4 trades (all wins, 100% win rate) yielding +31.98%, followed by 2025 with 4 trades (all wins, 100% win rate) generating +45.39%. In 2026, the strategy recorded 8 trades (7 wins, 1 loss) for a combined return of +70.13% and an 87.50% win rate. The absence of a single negative net year underscores the robust stability of the underlying trading logic across differing market regimes.

Recent period since 2024-06-01 versus full history

Analyzing performance from June 1, 2024, through the end of the sample provides crucial insights into the strategy's recent behavioral patterns. During this window, the algorithm completed 14 trades, generating a cumulative return of +136.03%. Remarkably, 14 out of the 35 total historical trades—representing 40.00% of all closed trades in the 7.08-year record—occurred during this recent period. This clustering of recent trades indicates an elevated rate of signal generation in the latter portion of the dataset compared to earlier years. Despite the increase in signal frequency, performance quality remained high: the average return per trade in the recent period was approximately +9.72%, closely aligning with the full-history average of +10.55%. The recent period confirms that the strategy's edge has remained intact in modern market conditions, continuing to deliver robust returns without sacrificing trade selection standards or incurring higher drawdown.

Strengths and limitations

The primary strength of the CTVA strategy lies in its exceptional return-to-risk ratio, characterized by a +2002.22% total gain alongside a remarkably low maximum drawdown of 5.00% and a profit factor of 3.75. The strategy's 80.00% win rate and maximum losing streak of 3 trades provide strong statistical durability. Furthermore, its low trade frequency (4.95 trades/year) renders it highly efficient for automated execution by trading robots or trading bots, as it minimizes turnover and transaction exposure. Conversely, the principal limitation of the strategy is its relatively small sample size of 35 completed trades over 7.08 years. While individual trade statistical quality is high, a sample of 35 trades carries inherent statistical uncertainty compared to high-frequency models. Additionally, the top three winning trades account for 44.35% of total gross profits, meaning that long-term outperformance relies heavily on successfully catching occasional large trend extensions. Traders must also tolerate long holding periods averaging 42.5 days, which requires patience and acceptance of overnight exposure.

DevioLab analytical conclusion

With a DevioLab score of 80.53 and the #1 ranking for CTVA stock, this algorithmic trading strategy demonstrates an outstanding historical track record defined by disciplined trend capture and defensive risk control. By pairing a granular 15-minute chart evaluation interval with long multi-week position durations, the system successfully filters market noise while maintaining high trade selectivity. The combination of an 80.00% win rate, a 3.75 profit factor, and a strict 5.00% maximum drawdown indicates that the algorithm's entry and exit mechanics have historically managed loss severity without capping upside potential. For quantitative developers and algorithmic investors seeking decision logic for automated trading bots, trading agents, or trading robots, the strategy presents a compelling blueprint for low-turnover, high-payoff stock trading. However, users should remain conscious of the 35-trade sample size and the profit concentration in top performers, ensuring that live implementation accounts for potential regime shifts and extended holding periods.

Data scope and methodology

The statistics presented in this report are derived from historical backtesting research conducted by DevioLab.com covering the period from September 16, 2019, to October 13, 2026 (7.08 years). The analysis evaluates closed completed trades generated on a 15-minute price data interval for CTVA stock. Performance metrics, including cumulative profit (+2002.22%), profit factor (3.75), drawdown (5.00%), and trade duration figures, reflect simulated rule execution and do not represent live account trading, real-time order routing, or guaranteed future performance. Metrics for the recent window evaluate all trades closed on or after June 1, 2024 UTC. This research is published strictly for analytical and educational purposes and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or endorsement of specific trading infrastructure.

Análisis completo de la estrategia