Cargando el estado del mercado bursátil de EE. UU.…
➜
CÓMO EMPEZAR
Completa toda la configuración del sistema en solo unos minutos.
Abrir guía de inicio rápido →
Catálogo público · DEVIOLAB

CATÁLOGO DE ESTRATEGIAS

Explora estrategias algorítmicas, compara su rendimiento y abre el historial completo de cada modelo.
Cada estrategia algorítmica corresponde a un agente de trading real (Trading Bot) creado por el equipo de DevioLab a partir de pruebas con datos históricos. Puede utilizarse para trading automatizado mediante API en plataformas compatibles, incluida Binance, o solo como Signal Bot con avisos por Telegram y email.
2 · Ticker
⌕
FILTROS
Todas las condiciones seleccionadas funcionan juntas
Filtros de sectores y grupos
DISPONIBILIDAD EN BOLSAS
A · Agilent Technologies Inc. (4) AAOI · Applied Optoelectronics Inc. (5) AAPL · Apple Inc. (7) ABBV · AbbVie Inc. (4) ABNB · Airbnb Inc. (4) ABT · Abbott Laboratories (4) ACGL · Arch Capital Group Ltd. (4) ACN · Accenture PLC Class A (4) ADBE · Adobe Inc. (3) ADI · Analog Devices Inc. (4) ADM · Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (4) ADP · Automatic Data Processing Inc. (4) ADSK · Autodesk Inc. (4) AEE · Ameren Corporation (4) AEP · American Electric Power Company, Inc. (4) AES · The AES Corporation (3) AFL · Aflac Incorporated (4) AIG · American International Group, Inc. (4) AIZ · Assurant Inc. (4) AJG · Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (4) AKAM · Akamai Technologies Inc. (4) ALAB · Astera Labs, Inc. (7) ALB · Albemarle Corporation (4) ALGN · Align Technology Inc. (4) ALL · The Allstate Corporation (4) ALLE · Allegion plc (4) ALNY · Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (4) AMAT · Applied Materials Inc. (7) AMCR · Amcor plc (4) AMD · Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (7) AME · AMETEK, Inc. (4) AMGN · Amgen Inc. (2) AMP · Ameriprise Financial Inc. (4) AMT · American Tower Corporation (4) AMZN · Amazon.com Inc. (7) ANET · Arista Networks Inc. (4) AON · Aon plc Class A (4) AOS · A. O. Smith Corporation (4) APA · APA Corporation (4) APD · Air Products and Chemicals Inc. (4) APH · Amphenol Corp. (4) APO · Apollo Global Management Inc. (4) APP · AppLovin Corporation (4) APTV · Aptiv PLC (4) ARE · Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (4) ARES · Ares Management Corp. (4) ARM · Arm Holdings plc ADR (7) ASML · ASML Holding N.V. NY (7) ASTS · AST SpaceMobile Inc. (6) ATO · Atmos Energy Corporation (4) AVGO · Broadcom Inc. (7) AVY · Avery Dennison Corporation (4) AWK · American Water Works Company, Inc. (4) AXON · Axon Enterprise, Inc. (4) AXP · American Express Company (4) AZO · AutoZone, Inc. (4) BA · Boeing Co/The (4) BABA · Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. ADR (6) BAC · Bank of America Corp. (4) BALL · Ball Corporation (4) BAX · Baxter International Inc. (4) BBY · Best Buy Co., Inc. (4) BDX · Becton, Dickinson and Company (4) BE · Bloom Energy Corp. (5) BEN · Franklin Templeton Inc. (4) BF.B · Brown-Forman Corp. (4) BG · Bunge Global SA (4) BIIB · Biogen Inc. (4) BK · The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (4) BKNG · Booking Holdings Inc. (4) BKR · Baker Hughes Company (4) BLDR · Builders FirstSource Inc. (3) BLK · BlackRock Inc. (4) BMNR · BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (5) BMY · Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (3) BNY · Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (3) BR · Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (4) BRK.B · Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B (4) BRO · Brown & Brown Inc. (4) BSX · Boston Scientific Corp. (3) BX · Blackstone Inc. (4) BXP · BXP, Inc. (4) C · Citigroup Inc. (4) CAH · Cardinal Health Inc. (4) CARR · Carrier Global Corp. (4) CASY · Casey's General Stores, Inc. (4) CAT · Caterpillar Inc. (4) CB · Chubb Limited (4) CBOE · Cboe Global Markets Inc. (4) CBRE · CBRE Group Inc. (4) CCEP · Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (4) CCI · Crown Castle Inc. (4) CCL · Carnival Corporation Ltd. (4) CDNS · Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (4) CDW · CDW Corporation (3) CEG · Constellation Energy Corporation (4) CF · CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (4) CFG · Citizens Financial Group Inc. (4) CHD · Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (4) CHRW · C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. (4) CHTR · Charter Communications Inc. (4) CI · The Cigna Group (4) CIEN · Ciena Corporation (4) CINF · Cincinnati Financial Corporation (3) CL · Colgate-Palmolive Co. (4) CLX · The Clorox Company (4) CMCSA · Comcast Corp. (4) CME · CME Group Inc. (4) CMG · Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (4) CMI · Cummins Inc. (4) CMS · CMS Energy Corporation (3) CNC · Centene Corp. (4) CNP · CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (4) COF · Capital One Financial Corp. (4) COHR · Coherent Corp. (7) COIN · Coinbase Global Inc. (3) COO · The Cooper Companies, Inc. (3) COP · ConocoPhillips (4) COR · Cencora Inc. (4) COST · Costco Wholesale Corporation (4) CPAY · Corpay Inc. (4) CPRT · Copart, Inc. (4) CPT · Camden Property Trust (4) CRCL · Circle Internet Group Inc. (5) CRDO · Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (8) CRH · CRH plc (4) CRL · Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (4) CRM · Salesforce, Inc. (4) CRWD · CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (4) CSCO · Cisco Systems Inc. (4) CSGP · CoStar Group, Inc. (4) CSX · CSX Corporation (4) CTAS · Cintas Corporation (4) CTSH · Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. (3) CTVA · Corteva Inc. (4) DELL · Dell Technologies Inc. (6) EWY · iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (6) FLNC · Fluence Energy, Inc. (7) GS · The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (6) HOOD · Robinhood Markets Inc. (7) IBM · International Business Machines Corporation (6) INTC · Intel Corporation (6) IREN · IREN Limited (7) LITE · Lumentum Holdings Inc. (6) META · Meta Platforms Inc. (7) MRVL · Marvell Technology, Inc. (6) MSFT · Microsoft Corporation (7) MSTR · Strategy Inc. (7) MU · Micron Technology Inc. (7) NFLX · Netflix Inc. (8) NOK · Nokia Corporation Sponsored ADR (7) NVDA · NVIDIA Corporation (7) PLTR · Palantir Technologies Inc. (7) PYPL · PayPal Holdings, Inc. (6) QQQ · Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (6) RKLB · Rocket Lab Corporation (4) SKHY · SK hynix Inc. ADR (3) SMCI · Super Micro Computer Inc. (6) SMH · VanEck Semiconductor ETF (4) SNDK · Sandisk Corp. (4) SOXS · Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (3) SPCX · Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (3) TSLA · Tesla, Inc. (6) TSM · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. ADR (5) USAR · USA Rare Earth, Inc. (3)
Resumen de la estrategia seleccionada

COIN · Coinbase Global Inc.

Stock Universe · mercado bursátil global
USD · NASDAQ · XNGS · United States
COIN 0 +91786.23% 1TRAD-MRD9
Recomendado por DevioLab · Core 1 iRecomendación principal de DevioLab: un perfil más protegido, suave y estable centrado en el control del riesgo y del drawdown.
Recomendado por DevioLab · Core 2 iRecomendación más agresiva de DevioLab: acepta mayor riesgo y drawdowns más profundos a cambio de rendimientos potencialmente superiores.
62Operaciones
87.1%Tasa de acierto
+13.47%Operación media
+126.29%Mejor operación
-13.32%Peor operación
+1,097.5%Anualizado
Perfil analítico de la estrategia · 3d289921f9c6d4b6

COIN Quantitative Analysis: Evaluating a Low-Frequency 15-Minute Swing Strategy with an 87.10% Historical Win Rate

An in-depth quantitative examination of the top-ranked algorithmic trading strategy for COIN (COINbase Global, Inc. stock). Evaluated across a 5.43-year sample spanning 2021 through 2026, this 15-minute timeframe quantitative model demonstrates an exceptional historical win rate of 87.10% across 62 completed trades, accompanied by a Profit Factor of 6.88 and a peak historical drawdown restricted to 18.02%. By pairing multi-day trade durations with highly selective entry frequency averaging just 11.42 trades per year, the strategy exemplifies how patient position execution on intraday chart intervals can construct robust equity curves in highly volatile equity environments suitable for deployment via automated trading bots and trading agents.

Análisis al 07.10.2026. Los datos de la estrategia se actualizan por separado.
Leer análisis completo

1. Strategy profile

The quantitative model evaluated in this research report, designated as COIN 0 +91786.23% 1TRAD-MRD9, represents the primary core strategy for COINbase Global, Inc. stock (ticker symbol COIN) within the DevioLab quantitative taxonomy. Achieving the highest rank (Rank 1) for its ticker with an overall DevioLab Score of 86.43, this model is built on an intraday 15-minute price evaluation interval while operating on a swing trading execution horizon. Rather than engaging in frequent intraday turnover, the strategy uses its 15-minute chart resolution to pin-point entry and exit timing while maintaining position holding periods that span multiple days or weeks. Over a backtested data window of 5.43 years—extending from April 14, 2021 to September 18, 2026—the model logged exactly 62 completed trades. This low trade count underscores a strategy architecture defined by extreme filter selectivity. Of these 62 completed cycles, 54 trades generated positive returns while only 8 resulted in net losses, establishing a benchmark historical win rate of 87.10%. The underlying logic is engineered for systematic deployment through automated trading bots, trading robots, or quantitative trading agents, enabling hands-off decision execution that bypasses real-time emotional bias. Across its full historical lifecycle, the compounded model performance reached a nominal +91,786.23%, reflecting a profit factor of 6.88. This profile demonstrates how highly constrained entry signals on intraday data can produce powerful multi-year performance in volatile modern equity markets.

2. Trading rhythm and position duration

A critical structural characteristic of this strategy is the fundamental decoupling between its observation interval (15-minute candle charts) and its historical position holding duration. While many 15-minute strategies execute multiple round-trips per day, this model maintains an average holding time of 253.55 hours (approximately 10.56 calendar days) and a median holding duration of 168.00 hours (exactly 7.00 calendar days). This indicates that the 15-minute timeframe functions strictly as a high-precision trigger mechanism for trend capture rather than a high-frequency trading protocol. In terms of trade pacing, the strategy generated an average of 11.42 completed trades per year, or approximately 1.29 trades per active trading month. The spacing between trade exits further highlights this deliberate pacing, with an average interval of 32.08 days and a median interval of 28.01 days between completed exits. In practical terms, an automated trading robot or algorithmic trading agent executing this model would remain out of the market or patiently hold a single ongoing position for weeks at a time before registering an exit signal. This low execution frequency creates a distinct operational profile: it reduces exposure to choppy sideways intraday price noise and minimizes execution friction, ensuring that each signal represents a high-conviction structural shift in COIN stock price action.

3. Quality of historical results

Evaluating trade performance distribution reveals a remarkably robust statistical profile where overall profitability is driven by both high hit-rate frequency and favorable payoff asymmetry. The average trade gain across all 62 completed cycles stands at +13.47%, compared to a median trade return of +10.23%. The positive gap between the mean and median indicates that while typical trades yield consistent double-digit gains, the distribution is augmented by occasional large upside outliers. The strategy's single best historical trade yielded an extraordinary +126.29%, whereas its worst historical trade lost -13.32%. Crucially, the top three winning trades combined accounted for 32.89% of the gross cumulative profit. While 32.89% represents a notable concentration in the extreme upper tail, it simultaneously demonstrates that over two-thirds of the total historical gain was generated across the remaining 51 winning trades. This balance prevents the strategy from being classified as a fragile one-hit outlier system. Combined with a Profit Factor of 6.88—meaning gross winning profits exceeded gross losing trades by nearly seven to one—the statistical quality of results reflects a strategy that consistently cuts losses short while allowing winning swing positions to run through substantial momentum phases.

4. Risk, drawdown and losing behavior

In quantitative risk assessment, maximum drawdown serves as a primary benchmark for evaluating capital preservation efficiency under adverse market regimes. Over the entire 5.43-year evaluation period, the maximum peak-to-trough drawdown recorded by the strategy was 18.02%. For an asset as historically volatile as COIN stock, restricting maximum simulated portfolio retracement below 20% while capturing multi-hundred percent cumulative gains is a standout structural achievement. This controlled drawdown behavior is directly linked to the strategy's strict risk mitigation characteristics: across 62 trades, the strategy experienced only 8 total losing trades, with a maximum consecutive losing streak of just 2 trades. Conversely, the model achieved a peak winning streak of 15 consecutive positive closed positions. Furthermore, the single worst loss of -13.32% closely mirrors the strategy's average gain (+13.47%), indicating that losing trades were contained within standard statistical boundaries rather than suffering catastrophic fat-tail downside events. The combined evidence indicates that the strategy's high win rate (87.10%) actively shields the portfolio equity curve from deep compounding drawdowns, providing an exceptionally smooth risk profile for automated trading bots and algorithmic deployment.

5. Behavior through time and yearly stability

An examination of the yearly breakdown demonstrates consistent performance across diverse macro and equity market regimes between 2021 and 2026. In 2021, over a partial operating history starting in April, the strategy completed 7 trades with a 100.00% win rate, yielding a combined trade return sum of +75.13%. During the severe tech and crypto market downturn of 2022, the strategy expanded its trade frequency to 11 closed trades, maintaining a 63.64% win rate (7 wins, 4 losses) while generating a net sum return of +190.83%, illustrating strong adaptability in bear or high-volatility environments. In 2023, trade frequency slowed to 6 trades, yet achieved a 100.00% win rate with a sum return of +262.13%. Activity increased substantially in 2024, recording 16 trades with a 93.75% win rate (15 wins, 1 loss) and +130.61% cumulative return. In 2025, the model posted 14 trades with an 85.71% win rate (12 wins, 2 losses) and +124.87% net gain. Finally, in the partial year of 2026 up to September, 8 trades were completed with an 87.50% win rate (7 wins, 1 loss) and +51.48% sum return. Across six consecutive calendar years, the strategy delivered positive overall returns every single year, proving that its quantitative edge is structural rather than an artifact of a single isolated bull market.

6. Recent period since 2024-06-01 versus full history

Isolating the recent window from June 1, 2024 through September 18, 2026 provides essential insight into the model's contemporary statistical health and dynamic alignment with recent market dynamics. Exactly 31 of the strategy's 62 lifetime trades—precisely 50.00% of all recorded historical trades—were closed during this recent period. These 31 trades produced a cumulative sum of closed trade gains equal to +271.87%. Comparing this to the lifetime total underscores a notable acceleration in trade signaling frequency without any dilution in signal accuracy. In the full history, the trade cadence averaged 11.42 trades per year, whereas during the 2.3-year recent window, the strategy executed approximately 13.5 trades per year. Because 28 of the 31 recent trades completed after June 2024 were profitable (reflected in the 2024, 2025, and 2026 yearly data), the recent win rate remains aligned with or slightly above the historical 87.10% baseline. This proves that the quantitative logic has maintained strong statistical relevance in recent trading conditions, offering empirical validation that the logic has not suffered from regime decay or curve-fitting attenuation in modern trading environments.

7. Strengths and limitations

The primary strength of this algorithmic strategy lies in its high win rate of 87.10% combined with a robust Profit Factor of 6.88 and a highly disciplined maximum drawdown of 18.02%. By utilizing a 15-minute chart to time entries into multi-day swing positions (average hold of 253.55 hours), the model effectively avoids over-trading while capturing large trend moves in COIN stock, as evidenced by its top winner of +126.29%. The consistent annual positive returns from 2021 through 2026 further highlight its stability. However, distinct limitations must be acknowledged by quantitative analysts. With only 62 completed trades over 5.43 years, the overall sample size is statistically modest. While 62 trades provide valuable empirical signal, low-sample strategies carry inherently wider confidence intervals around expected future win rates. Furthermore, because individual positions are held for an average of 10.5 days, automated trading bots executing this logic must tolerate extended periods of open position market exposure, during which overnight earnings gaps or broader equity market shocks could impact execution price relative to historical backtested modeling.

8. DevioLab analytical conclusion

In summary, the COIN 0 +91786.23% 1TRAD-MRD9 model establishes a compelling standard for quantitative swing trading on volatile single-stock equities. Securing the Rank 1 position for COIN stock on DevioLab with a score of 86.43, the strategy demonstrates that low-frequency, high-conviction filtering on intraday 15-minute charts can successfully capture multi-day trends while maintaining stringent downside risk control. Its historical profile—characterized by an 87.10% win rate, a 6.88 Profit Factor, a modest 18.02% maximum drawdown, and positive net returns in every tested calendar year from 2021 through 2026—makes it an outstanding candidate logic for systematic implementation via automated trading bots and quantitative trading agents. Analysts evaluating this strategy should monitor ongoing trade generation to verify that future signal frequency aligns with the established sample while maintaining the strong asymmetry between average gains (+13.47%) and managed worst-case losses (-13.32%).

9. Data scope and methodology

This quantitative analysis is based strictly on historical backtested performance data generated for the asset COIN (COINbase Global, Inc. stock) across the timeframe interval of 15 minutes between April 14, 2021 and September 18, 2026 UTC. All reported statistics—including trade counts, win rates, holding durations, drawdown figures, profit factors, and annual sum percentages—reflect simulated historical closed trades and do not represent live account trading outcomes. The start date of April 14, 2021 marks the beginning of the strategy dataset and does not denote the corporate founding, listing date, or IPO of COINbase Global, Inc. Quantitative metrics do not incorporate real-world execution slippage, broker commission structures, borrow rates, or variable exchange fees. Past historical performance derived from algorithmic backtesting provides statistical context for strategy design but constitutes no guarantee of future trading performance.

Análisis completo de la estrategia