Loading US stock market status…
➜
HOW TO START
Complete the full system setup in just a few minutes.
Open Quick Start Guide →
Public catalog · DEVIOLAB

TRADING STRATEGIES & BOTS

Choose a trading strategy and activate a bot that will trade automatically by its rules.
A strategy defines the buying and selling rules. A trading bot executes those rules through the API of a supported exchange. You can also use the selected strategy as a signal bot with Telegram and email notifications.
FILTERS
Choose Core 1 for a balanced start, select an exchange for trading and find the ticker you need. Filters work together.
Sector & group filters
Trading exchange?Shows instruments available for SPOT trading against USDT according to the latest normalization. Click the selected exchange again to show all exchanges.
A · Agilent Technologies Inc. (4) AAOI · Applied Optoelectronics Inc. (5) AAPL · Apple Inc. (7) ABBV · AbbVie Inc. (4) ABNB · Airbnb Inc. (4) ABT · Abbott Laboratories (4) ACGL · Arch Capital Group Ltd. (4) ACN · Accenture PLC Class A (4) ADBE · Adobe Inc. (3) ADI · Analog Devices Inc. (4) ADM · Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (4) ADP · Automatic Data Processing Inc. (4) ADSK · Autodesk Inc. (4) AEE · Ameren Corporation (4) AEP · American Electric Power Company, Inc. (4) AES · The AES Corporation (3) AFL · Aflac Incorporated (4) AIG · American International Group, Inc. (4) AIZ · Assurant Inc. (4) AJG · Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (4) AKAM · Akamai Technologies Inc. (4) ALAB · Astera Labs, Inc. (7) ALB · Albemarle Corporation (4) ALGN · Align Technology Inc. (4) ALL · The Allstate Corporation (4) ALLE · Allegion plc (4) ALNY · Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (4) AMAT · Applied Materials Inc. (7) AMCR · Amcor plc (4) AMD · Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (7) AME · AMETEK, Inc. (4) AMGN · Amgen Inc. (2) AMP · Ameriprise Financial Inc. (4) AMT · American Tower Corporation (4) AMZN · Amazon.com Inc. (7) ANET · Arista Networks Inc. (4) AON · Aon plc Class A (4) AOS · A. O. Smith Corporation (4) APA · APA Corporation (4) APD · Air Products and Chemicals Inc. (4) APH · Amphenol Corp. (4) APO · Apollo Global Management Inc. (4) APP · AppLovin Corporation (4) APTV · Aptiv PLC (4) ARE · Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (4) ARES · Ares Management Corp. (4) ARM · Arm Holdings plc ADR (7) ASML · ASML Holding N.V. NY (7) ASTS · AST SpaceMobile Inc. (6) ATO · Atmos Energy Corporation (4) AVGO · Broadcom Inc. (7) AVY · Avery Dennison Corporation (4) AWK · American Water Works Company, Inc. (4) AXON · Axon Enterprise, Inc. (4) AXP · American Express Company (4) AZO · AutoZone, Inc. (4) BA · Boeing Co/The (4) BABA · Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. ADR (6) BAC · Bank of America Corp. (4) BALL · Ball Corporation (4) BAX · Baxter International Inc. (4) BBY · Best Buy Co., Inc. (4) BDX · Becton, Dickinson and Company (4) BE · Bloom Energy Corp. (5) BEN · Franklin Templeton Inc. (4) BF.B · Brown-Forman Corp. (4) BG · Bunge Global SA (4) BIIB · Biogen Inc. (3) BK · The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (4) BKNG · Booking Holdings Inc. (4) BKR · Baker Hughes Company (4) BLDR · Builders FirstSource Inc. (3) BLK · BlackRock Inc. (4) BMNR · BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (5) BMY · Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (3) BNY · Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (4) BR · Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (4) BRK.B · Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B (4) BRO · Brown & Brown Inc. (4) BSX · Boston Scientific Corp. (3) BX · Blackstone Inc. (4) BXP · BXP, Inc. (4) C · Citigroup Inc. (4) CAH · Cardinal Health Inc. (4) CARR · Carrier Global Corp. (4) CASY · Casey's General Stores, Inc. (4) CAT · Caterpillar Inc. (4) CB · Chubb Limited (4) CBOE · Cboe Global Markets Inc. (4) CBRE · CBRE Group Inc. (4) CCEP · Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (4) CCI · Crown Castle Inc. (4) CCL · Carnival Corporation Ltd. (4) CDNS · Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (4) CDW · CDW Corporation (3) CEG · Constellation Energy Corporation (4) CF · CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (4) CFG · Citizens Financial Group Inc. (4) CHD · Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (4) CHRW · C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. (4) CHTR · Charter Communications Inc. (4) CI · The Cigna Group (4) CIEN · Ciena Corporation (4) CINF · Cincinnati Financial Corporation (3) CL · Colgate-Palmolive Co. (4) CLX · The Clorox Company (4) CMCSA · Comcast Corp. (4) CME · CME Group Inc. (4) CMG · Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (4) CMI · Cummins Inc. (4) CMS · CMS Energy Corporation (3) CNC · Centene Corp. (4) CNP · CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (4) COF · Capital One Financial Corp. (4) COHR · Coherent Corp. (7) COIN · Coinbase Global Inc. (3) COO · The Cooper Companies, Inc. (4) COP · ConocoPhillips (4) COR · Cencora Inc. (4) COST · Costco Wholesale Corporation (4) CPAY · Corpay Inc. (4) CPRT · Copart, Inc. (4) CPT · Camden Property Trust (4) CRCL · Circle Internet Group Inc. (5) CRDO · Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (8) CRH · CRH plc (4) CRL · Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (4) CRM · Salesforce, Inc. (4) CRWD · CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (4) CSCO · Cisco Systems Inc. (4) CSGP · CoStar Group, Inc. (4) CSX · CSX Corporation (4) CTAS · Cintas Corporation (4) CTSH · Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. (3) CTVA · Corteva Inc. (3) CVNA · Carvana Co. (4) CVS · CVS Health Corporation (4) CVX · Chevron Corp. (4) D · Dominion Energy, Inc. (4) DAL · Delta Air Lines, Inc. (4) DASH · DoorDash, Inc. (4) DD · DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (4) DDOG · Datadog Inc. Class A (4) DE · Deere & Company (4) DECK · Deckers Outdoor Corporation (4) DELL · Dell Technologies Inc. (7) DG · Dollar General Corp. (4) DGX · Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (4) DHI · D.R. Horton, Inc. (4) DHR · Danaher Corp. (4) DIS · The Walt Disney Company (4) DLR · Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (4) DLTR · Dollar Tree Inc. (4) DOC · Healthpeak Properties, Inc. (4) DOV · Dover Corporation (4) DOW · Dow Inc. (4) DPZ · Domino's Pizza, Inc. (4) DRI · Darden Restaurants, Inc. (4) DTE · DTE Energy Company (4) DUK · Duke Energy Corporation (4) DVA · DaVita Inc. (4) DVN · Devon Energy Corporation (4) DXCM · DexCom Inc. (4) EBAY · eBay Inc. (4) ECHO · EchoStar Corp. (4) ECL · Ecolab Inc. (4) ED · Consolidated Edison Inc. (4) EFX · Equifax Inc. (4) EG · Everest Group, Ltd. (4) EIX · Edison International (4) EL · The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (4) ELV · Elevance Health, Inc. (4) EME · EMCOR Group, Inc. (4) EMR · Emerson Electric Co. (4) EOG · EOG Resources, Inc. (4) EQIX · Equinix, Inc. (4) ERIE · Erie Indemnity Company (4) EWY · iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (6) FLNC · Fluence Energy, Inc. (7) GS · The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (6) HOOD · Robinhood Markets Inc. (7) IBM · International Business Machines Corporation (6) INTC · Intel Corporation (6) IREN · IREN Limited (6) LITE · Lumentum Holdings Inc. (5) META · Meta Platforms Inc. (6) MRVL · Marvell Technology, Inc. (6) MSFT · Microsoft Corporation (7) MSTR · Strategy Inc. (7) MU · Micron Technology Inc. (7) NFLX · Netflix Inc. (8) NOK · Nokia Corporation Sponsored ADR (6) NVDA · NVIDIA Corporation (7) PLTR · Palantir Technologies Inc. (8) PYPL · PayPal Holdings, Inc. (6) QQQ · Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (6) RKLB · Rocket Lab Corporation (4) SKHY · SK hynix Inc. ADR (3) SMCI · Super Micro Computer Inc. (5) SMH · VanEck Semiconductor ETF (4) SNDK · Sandisk Corp. (4) SOXS · Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (3) SPCX · Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (3) TSLA · Tesla, Inc. (6) TSM · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. ADR (4) USAR · USA Rare Earth, Inc. (2)
Selected strategy overview

DOW · Dow Inc.

Stock Universe · global stock market
USD · NYSE · XNYS · United States
DOW 0 +3674.58% 1TRAD-DST7
Recommended by DevioLab · Core 1 iEach ticker — a cryptocurrency pair or stock/ETF — can have several strategies with different trade frequencies and risk levels. Core 1 is DevioLab’s primary, most balanced selection for that ticker: the system selects a strategy with an emphasis on risk and drawdown control. It is the preferred starting choice. You can also choose a more conservative or aggressive strategy yourself by comparing its trades and charts below.
Recommended by DevioLab · Core 2 iCore 2 is DevioLab’s more dynamic, aggressive selection for a ticker. It accepts higher risk and deeper drawdowns for potentially higher returns. A ticker can have several strategies; compare their trades and charts below and choose the profile that suits you.
180Trades
76.1%Win rate
+2.38%Avg trade
+20.18%Best trade
-20.59%Worst trade
+356.8%Annualized
Strategy analytical profile · 813346c5b5d25e14

Quantitative Analysis of DOW 15-Minute Algorithmic Swing Strategy: High Hit-Rate Precision and Low Outlier Reliance

This analytical report evaluates a high-performing quantitative trading strategy developed for DOW equity market exposure over a 7.04-year evaluation period from September 2019 through September 2026. Operating on a 15-minute timeframe resolution, the strategy functions as a selective swing model that averages approximately 8 days per position. Across 179 completed historical trades, the model generated a cumulative closed-trade return sum of 3,674.58% with an overall win rate of 75.98% and a profit factor of 2.50. A key structural finding is the minimal concentration of gross profits, where the top three winning trades account for only 8.43% of total gains, indicating broad-based performance rather than dependence on single outlier trades. This study provides an exhaustive examination of the strategy's risk metrics, annual stability, recent performance since June 2024, and practical implications for automated trading systems.

Analysis as of 21.10.2026. Strategy data is updated separately.
Read full analysis

Strategy profile

The algorithmic model analyzed in this report is designed specifically for DOW stock, operating on a 15-minute chart evaluation interval. Evaluated over a continuous historical span of 7.04 years from September 16, 2019, through September 28, 2026, the strategy recorded 179 closed trades, achieving a DevioLab score of 77.57 and earning a rank of 2 among all strategies evaluated for the DOW ticker. Over the entire backtested history, the strategy accumulated a total trade return sum of 3,674.58%, which translates to an annualized equivalent figure of 356.81%. The design logic provides a structured set of rules intended for seamless integration into automated trading bots, trading robots, or quantitative execution agents. By processing market data on a 15-minute interval while maintaining selective entry criteria, the strategy bridges short-term structural signal detection with multi-day position holding, allowing automated systems to capture sustained price swings without over-trading.

Trading rhythm and position duration

Although the algorithm evaluates market price action every 15 minutes, its execution pace is disciplined and restrained. The strategy completed 179 trades across more than seven years, corresponding to an average frequency of 25.44 trades per year or roughly 2.21 trades per active month. Position holding times reveal a distinct multi-day swing architecture: the average holding duration spans 194.88 hours (approximately 8.12 days), while the median holding period stands at 143.00 hours (5.96 days). The exit cadence reflects a similar pacing, with an average interval of 14.29 days between trade exits and a median exit interval of 12.15 days. This temporal structure demonstrates that the 15-minute bar frequency serves primarily as an execution micro-grid for optimized entries and exits rather than a catalyst for high-frequency trading. For automated trading agents and execution bots, this lower trade frequency implies fewer order events over time, requiring patient operational deployment despite the granular input interval.

Quality of historical results

The statistical distribution of trade returns indicates high structural efficiency and favorable payoff mechanics. Out of 179 closed positions, 136 yielded positive returns while 43 resulted in losses, establishing a baseline win rate of 75.98%. The strategy achieved a profit factor of 2.50, meaning gross historical profits exceeded gross historical losses by two and a half times. The average trade performance yielded +2.34%, aligning closely with the median trade result of +2.54%, which highlights consistency across individual trade outcomes. The single best historical trade delivered a gain of +20.18%, whereas the worst trade incurred a loss of -20.59%. Crucially, the top three winning trades represented just 8.43% of total gross profit. This remarkably low concentration score proves that the strategy's cumulative gain of 3,674.58% was generated through sustained statistical edge across numerous winning events rather than a small cluster of lucky windfall trades.

Risk, drawDOWn and losing behavior

Risk management metrics demonstrate robust equity curve preservation relative to cumulative returns. The strategy experienced a historical maximum drawDOWn of 22.79% across its 7.04-year timeline. When viewed alongside the worst individual trade outcome of -20.59%, the maximum drawDOWn indicates that peak-to-trough equity declines were largely driven by isolated tail-risk trade events or small loss clusters rather than prolonged structural decay. The strategy demonstrated strong resilience against extended losing streaks, recording a maximum consecutive loss sequence of just 4 trades. In contrast, the longest winning streak reached 11 consecutive profitable trades. Combined with the 75.98% hit rate, the brevity of losing streaks enabled rapid historical drawDOWn recovery. However, the presence of a -20.59% worst trade serves as a reminder that quantitative position sizing and risk limits remain necessary when deploying automated trading robots under real-world market conditions.

Behavior through time and yearly stability

An examination of yearly performance data reveals remarkable consistency across changing market environments. Every calendar year from 2019 through 2026 produced positive aggregate returns. In 2019 (partial year from September), 7 trades produced a 71.43% win rate and a +17.06% return sum. The strategy experienced its strongest yearly gain in 2020, executing 29 trades with a 79.31% win rate for a combined sum of +102.66%. Performance remained steady in 2021 (27 trades, 77.78% win rate, +48.43% sum) and 2022 (26 trades, 80.77% win rate, +43.90% sum). In 2023, the strategy achieved its highest yearly win rate at 83.33% across 18 trades, totaling +30.87%. The year 2024 marked a relative consolidation phase, recording 23 trades, a lower win rate of 65.22%, and a return sum of +24.47%. Momentum rebounded sharply in 2025 (25 trades, 76.00% win rate, +55.68% sum) and continued strongly into 2026 (24 trades, 70.83% win rate, +96.50% sum). This uniform annual profitability highlights the structural stability of the underlying trading logic across multiple annual cycles.

Recent period since 2024-06-01 versus full history

Analyzing trade activity from June 1, 2024, through September 28, 2026, offers insight into the model's recent statistical health. During this recent winDOW, the strategy completed 65 trades, generating a cumulative return sum of +168.10%. Representing over 36% of total historical trade volume within a winDOW that spans approximately two years, this trade count reflects heightened opportunity capture in recent market conditions. The cumulative sum of +168.10% during this period demonstrates that the strategy's statistical edge remained fully intact long after its 2019 historical baseline. Comparing the recent winDOW's return pace against earlier multi-year averages confirms that the quantitative signals continue to trigger effectively, offering solid empirical validation for quantitative agents operating in modern equity trading environments.

Strengths and limitations

The primary strength of this strategy lies in its high win rate of 75.98% combined with an extraordinarily low gross profit concentration of 8.43% among its top three winners. This balance confirms a repeatable, broad-based positive expectancy across varied market conditions. Additional strengths include a profit factor of 2.50, a limited maximum losing streak of 4 trades, and uninterrupted annual profitability across eight consecutive calendar years. Conversely, notable limitations include the magnitude of the single worst trade (-20.59%), which nearly mirrors the best single trade (+20.18%), proving that DOWnside tail risk can be substantial on individual positions. Additionally, a maximum drawDOWn of 22.79% requires adequate account capitalization. Finally, with an average of only 2.21 trades per month, the strategy demands operational patience, as automated trading bots may experience extended inactive periods between signal activations.

DevioLab analytical conclusion

Achieving a DevioLab score of 77.57 and ranking 2 overall for the DOW ticker, this 15-minute algorithmic strategy represents a robust, highly reliable swing trading model. Its combination of high hit-rate precision, multi-day holding logic, and broad return distribution across 179 completed trades makes it a compelling candidate for quantitative portfolios. The strategy effectively balances risk and return, maintaining positive performance across all historical yearly cohorts and displaying powerful momentum in recent years with +168.10% accumulated since June 2024. For developers and traders utilizing automated trading agents or trading robots, the strategy offers a structured decision engine that minimizes over-trading while capturing consistent medium-term equity swings, provided that account leverage and position sizing are calibrated to withstand occasional tail-risk drawDOWns.

Data scope and methodology

This study is based exclusively on simulated historical backtest statistics for the strategy applied to DOW stock over the period from September 16, 2019, to September 28, 2026. All trade metrics, including profit sums, win rates, drawDOWn figures, holding durations, and annual breakDOWns, are calculated from 179 closed trade records within this dataset. The recent winDOW metrics cover completed trades with sell timestamps on or after June 1, 2024 UTC. Performance percentages represent the simple sum of individual trade results and do not reflect compounded account growth, slippage, execution fees, or live market brokerage charges. Historical backtested performance provides empirical insight into strategy behavior but does not guarantee future results.

Full strategy analysis