Loading US stock market status…
➜
HOW TO START
Complete the full system setup in just a few minutes.
Open Quick Start Guide →
Public catalog · DEVIOLAB

TRADING STRATEGIES & BOTS

Choose a trading strategy and activate a bot that will trade automatically by its rules.
A strategy defines the buying and selling rules. A trading bot executes those rules through the API of a supported exchange. You can also use the selected strategy as a signal bot with Telegram and email notifications.
FILTERS
Choose Core 1 for a balanced start, select an exchange for trading and find the ticker you need. Filters work together.
Sector & group filters
Trading exchange?Shows instruments available for SPOT trading against USDT according to the latest normalization. Click the selected exchange again to show all exchanges.
A · Agilent Technologies Inc. (4) AAOI · Applied Optoelectronics Inc. (5) AAPL · Apple Inc. (7) ABBV · AbbVie Inc. (4) ABNB · Airbnb Inc. (4) ABT · Abbott Laboratories (4) ACGL · Arch Capital Group Ltd. (4) ACN · Accenture PLC Class A (4) ADBE · Adobe Inc. (3) ADI · Analog Devices Inc. (4) ADM · Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (4) ADP · Automatic Data Processing Inc. (4) ADSK · Autodesk Inc. (4) AEE · Ameren Corporation (4) AEP · American Electric Power Company, Inc. (4) AES · The AES Corporation (3) AFL · Aflac Incorporated (4) AIG · American International Group, Inc. (4) AIZ · Assurant Inc. (4) AJG · Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (4) AKAM · Akamai Technologies Inc. (4) ALAB · Astera Labs, Inc. (7) ALB · Albemarle Corporation (4) ALGN · Align Technology Inc. (4) ALL · The Allstate Corporation (4) ALLE · Allegion plc (4) ALNY · Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (4) AMAT · Applied Materials Inc. (7) AMCR · Amcor plc (4) AMD · Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (7) AME · AMETEK, Inc. (4) AMGN · Amgen Inc. (2) AMP · Ameriprise Financial Inc. (4) AMT · American Tower Corporation (4) AMZN · Amazon.com Inc. (7) ANET · Arista Networks Inc. (4) AON · Aon plc Class A (4) AOS · A. O. Smith Corporation (4) APA · APA Corporation (4) APD · Air Products and Chemicals Inc. (4) APH · Amphenol Corp. (4) APO · Apollo Global Management Inc. (4) APP · AppLovin Corporation (4) APTV · Aptiv PLC (4) ARE · Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (4) ARES · Ares Management Corp. (4) ARM · Arm Holdings plc ADR (7) ASML · ASML Holding N.V. NY (7) ASTS · AST SpaceMobile Inc. (6) ATO · Atmos Energy Corporation (4) AVGO · Broadcom Inc. (7) AVY · Avery Dennison Corporation (4) AWK · American Water Works Company, Inc. (4) AXON · Axon Enterprise, Inc. (4) AXP · American Express Company (4) AZO · AutoZone, Inc. (4) BA · Boeing Co/The (4) BABA · Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. ADR (6) BAC · Bank of America Corp. (4) BALL · Ball Corporation (4) BAX · Baxter International Inc. (4) BBY · Best Buy Co., Inc. (4) BDX · Becton, Dickinson and Company (4) BE · Bloom Energy Corp. (5) BEN · Franklin Templeton Inc. (4) BF.B · Brown-Forman Corp. (4) BG · Bunge Global SA (4) BIIB · Biogen Inc. (3) BK · The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (4) BKNG · Booking Holdings Inc. (4) BKR · Baker Hughes Company (4) BLDR · Builders FirstSource Inc. (3) BLK · BlackRock Inc. (4) BMNR · BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (5) BMY · Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (3) BNY · Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (4) BR · Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (4) BRK.B · Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B (4) BRO · Brown & Brown Inc. (4) BSX · Boston Scientific Corp. (3) BX · Blackstone Inc. (4) BXP · BXP, Inc. (4) C · Citigroup Inc. (4) CAH · Cardinal Health Inc. (4) CARR · Carrier Global Corp. (4) CASY · Casey's General Stores, Inc. (4) CAT · Caterpillar Inc. (4) CB · Chubb Limited (4) CBOE · Cboe Global Markets Inc. (4) CBRE · CBRE Group Inc. (4) CCEP · Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (4) CCI · Crown Castle Inc. (4) CCL · Carnival Corporation Ltd. (4) CDNS · Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (4) CDW · CDW Corporation (3) CEG · Constellation Energy Corporation (4) CF · CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (4) CFG · Citizens Financial Group Inc. (4) CHD · Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (4) CHRW · C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. (4) CHTR · Charter Communications Inc. (4) CI · The Cigna Group (4) CIEN · Ciena Corporation (4) CINF · Cincinnati Financial Corporation (3) CL · Colgate-Palmolive Co. (4) CLX · The Clorox Company (4) CMCSA · Comcast Corp. (4) CME · CME Group Inc. (4) CMG · Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (4) CMI · Cummins Inc. (4) CMS · CMS Energy Corporation (3) CNC · Centene Corp. (4) CNP · CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (4) COF · Capital One Financial Corp. (4) COHR · Coherent Corp. (7) COIN · Coinbase Global Inc. (3) COO · The Cooper Companies, Inc. (4) COP · ConocoPhillips (4) COR · Cencora Inc. (4) COST · Costco Wholesale Corporation (4) CPAY · Corpay Inc. (4) CPRT · Copart, Inc. (4) CPT · Camden Property Trust (4) CRCL · Circle Internet Group Inc. (5) CRDO · Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (8) CRH · CRH plc (4) CRL · Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (4) CRM · Salesforce, Inc. (4) CRWD · CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (4) CSCO · Cisco Systems Inc. (4) CSGP · CoStar Group, Inc. (4) CSX · CSX Corporation (4) CTAS · Cintas Corporation (4) CTSH · Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. (3) CTVA · Corteva Inc. (3) CVNA · Carvana Co. (4) CVS · CVS Health Corporation (4) CVX · Chevron Corp. (4) D · Dominion Energy, Inc. (4) DAL · Delta Air Lines, Inc. (4) DASH · DoorDash, Inc. (4) DD · DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (4) DDOG · Datadog Inc. Class A (4) DE · Deere & Company (4) DECK · Deckers Outdoor Corporation (4) DELL · Dell Technologies Inc. (7) DG · Dollar General Corp. (4) DGX · Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (4) DHI · D.R. Horton, Inc. (4) DHR · Danaher Corp. (4) DIS · The Walt Disney Company (4) DLR · Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (4) DLTR · Dollar Tree Inc. (4) DOC · Healthpeak Properties, Inc. (4) DOV · Dover Corporation (4) DOW · Dow Inc. (4) DPZ · Domino's Pizza, Inc. (4) DRI · Darden Restaurants, Inc. (4) DTE · DTE Energy Company (4) DUK · Duke Energy Corporation (4) DVA · DaVita Inc. (4) DVN · Devon Energy Corporation (4) DXCM · DexCom Inc. (4) EBAY · eBay Inc. (4) ECHO · EchoStar Corp. (4) ECL · Ecolab Inc. (4) ED · Consolidated Edison Inc. (4) EFX · Equifax Inc. (4) EG · Everest Group, Ltd. (4) EIX · Edison International (4) EL · The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (4) ELV · Elevance Health, Inc. (4) EME · EMCOR Group, Inc. (4) EMR · Emerson Electric Co. (4) EOG · EOG Resources, Inc. (4) EQIX · Equinix, Inc. (4) ERIE · Erie Indemnity Company (4) EWY · iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (6) FLNC · Fluence Energy, Inc. (7) GS · The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (6) HOOD · Robinhood Markets Inc. (7) IBM · International Business Machines Corporation (6) INTC · Intel Corporation (6) IREN · IREN Limited (6) LITE · Lumentum Holdings Inc. (5) META · Meta Platforms Inc. (6) MRVL · Marvell Technology, Inc. (6) MSFT · Microsoft Corporation (7) MSTR · Strategy Inc. (7) MU · Micron Technology Inc. (7) NFLX · Netflix Inc. (8) NOK · Nokia Corporation Sponsored ADR (6) NVDA · NVIDIA Corporation (7) PLTR · Palantir Technologies Inc. (8) PYPL · PayPal Holdings, Inc. (6) QQQ · Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (6) RKLB · Rocket Lab Corporation (4) SKHY · SK hynix Inc. ADR (3) SMCI · Super Micro Computer Inc. (5) SMH · VanEck Semiconductor ETF (4) SNDK · Sandisk Corp. (4) SOXS · Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (3) SPCX · Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (3) TSLA · Tesla, Inc. (6) TSM · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. ADR (4) USAR · USA Rare Earth, Inc. (2)
Selected strategy overview

DIS · The Walt Disney Company

Stock Universe · global stock market
USD · NYSE · XNYS · United States
DIS 0 +1416.31% 1TRAD-BOW6
Recommended by DevioLab · Core 1 iEach ticker — a cryptocurrency pair or stock/ETF — can have several strategies with different trade frequencies and risk levels. Core 1 is DevioLab’s primary, most balanced selection for that ticker: the system selects a strategy with an emphasis on risk and drawdown control. It is the preferred starting choice. You can also choose a more conservative or aggressive strategy yourself by comparing its trades and charts below.
Recommended by DevioLab · Core 2 iCore 2 is DevioLab’s more dynamic, aggressive selection for a ticker. It accepts higher risk and deeper drawdowns for potentially higher returns. A ticker can have several strategies; compare their trades and charts below and choose the profile that suits you.
106Trades
77.4%Win rate
+2.95%Avg trade
+21.88%Best trade
-16.49%Worst trade
+145.2%Annualized
Strategy analytical profile · 5277a12f4966c9a1

DIS · DIS Equity Algorithmic Strategy: Analyzing a 77.14% Win Rate and 1416.31% Historical Gain Across Multi-Day Swing Durations

This quantitative research report evaluates an automated swing-trading algorithmic strategy for DIS (DIS) built on 15-minute price data. Over a nearly seven-year backtested historical period comprising 105 completed trades, the strategy achieved a cumulative simulated return of 1416.31% with a profit factor of 2.50 and a high hit rate of 77.14%. By combining granular intraday timing with extended holding periods averaging 238.2 hours, the strategy generates low-frequency, high-expectancy trade setups. Analysis reveals an exceptionally balanced DIStribution of gains, where the top three winning trades account for only 14.07% of total gross profit, and positive net historical performance was maintained across every calendar year analyzed.

Analysis as of 19.10.2026. Strategy data is updated separately.
Read full analysis

Strategy profile

The algorithmic trading strategy evaluated in this report, identified by its system structure DIS 0 +1416.31% 1TRAD-BOW6, operates on the equity ticker DIS (DIS) using a 15-minute chart resolution. Developed as automated decision logic designed to power algorithmic trading bots, autonomous trading robots, and quantitative trading agents, the system focuses on capturing directional intermediate trends rather than noise-driven intraday oscillations. Over a backtested timeline spanning 6.99 years from September 16, 2019, through September 11, 2026, the strategy compiled a cumulative return of 1416.31%, yielding an annualized metric of 145.20% across 105 completed trades. DevioLab evaluates this strategy with a composite score of 79.27, placing it at rank 2 among all analyzed models for DIS. The system operates with moderate trade frequency, executing roughly 15 trades per calendar year, which reflects a highly selective filtering process that emphasizes position quality over trading volume.

Trading rhythm and position duration

Although the underlying data feed is structured on a 15-minute timeframe, the operational holding characteristics of this strategy belong to a multi-day swing framework. The average trade duration spans 238.20 hours, or approximately 9.9 calendar days, while the median holding time stands at 174.00 hours, equivalent to 7.25 days. The strategy exits positions infrequently, exhibiting an average interval between trade exits of 24.45 days and a median exit interval of 19.79 days. Across active trading months, the strategy averages just 1.48 closed trades. This combination of intraday trigger evaluation with multi-day position holding allows automated trading agents to refine entry timing on lower-timeframe signals while allowing macro trends in DIS to unfold without premature exit pressure. The extended gap between exits confirms that the system is built to sit out non-trending or noisy market phases, preserving capital until high-probability structures emerge.

Quality of historical results

The quality of historical returns generated by this strategy is characterized by a strong win rate coupled with a balanced payoff DIStribution. Out of 105 total completed trades, 81 resulted in gains and 24 ended in losses, establishing a hit rate of 77.14%. The profit factor of 2.50 reflects a robust statistical advantage, meaning that gross gains exceeded gross losses by two and a half times. The average trade performance sits at +2.96%, closely aligned with the median trade result of +2.65%, indicating that individual return DIStributions are tight and predictable rather than driven by extreme statistical skewness. Furthermore, the strategy's top three winning trades account for only 14.07% of gross profit. This low profit concentration is a vital quality metric, demonstrating that the strategy does not depend on a handful of black-swan tail events, but instead derives its long-term equity growth from a repeatable series of solid, broad-based trade outcomes.

Risk, drawdown and losing behavior

Risk parameters within the historical backtest indicate controlled capital preservation alongside occasional exposure to outlier adverse price action. The maximum overall drawdown recorded across the nearly seven-year history was 17.16%, a modest peak-to-trough decline relative to the 1416.31% total return. The strategy demonstrated strong streak resiliency, achieving a maximum winning streak of 12 consecutive trades compared to a maximum losing streak of 4 consecutive trades. However, a noticeable structural tension exists between the average gain and the worst individual trade loss. While the average trade return is +2.96%, the single worst historical trade produced a decline of -16.49%. Conversely, the best individual trade yielded a gain of +21.88%. The presence of a -16.49% worst trade illustrates that while losing trades are infrequent, automated execution models must account for tail-risk events where gap risk or swift trend reversals exceed typical exit boundaries before risk mitigation triggers.

Behavior through time and yearly stability

An examination of the yearly performance breakdown reveals consistent historical profitability across diverse equity market environments. In 2019, during the initial sample period, 2 trades yielded a net return of +0.80% with a 50.00% win rate. Activity accelerated in 2020, delivering 20 trades, an 85.00% win rate, and a net cumulative return of +90.27%. Performance remained strong in 2021 with 16 trades, an 81.25% win rate, and +45.06% total return. During the broader market headwinds of 2022, the strategy logged 18 trades with a reduced win rate of 61.11%, yet still achieved a positive total gain of +33.19%. Subsequent years maintained this positive trajectory: 2023 saw 15 trades (+35.26% sum return, 80.00% win rate), 2024 produced 11 trades (+25.67% sum return, 63.64% win rate), 2025 delivered 10 trades (+29.83% sum return, 80.00% win rate), and 2026 recorded 13 trades (+50.23% sum return, 92.31% win rate). Crucially, the strategy avoided losing calendar years entirely, demonstrating adaptable multi-year stability.

Recent period since 2024-06-01 versus full history

Analyzing the recent dataset from June 1, 2024, onward offers valuable insight into the strategy's contemporary performance and persistence. During this recent window, the system completed 30 trades, generating a combined return sum of +95.56%. The completion of 30 trades in approximately two years indicates a slight increase in trade frequency compared to the historical full-period baseline of 15.02 trades per year. The historical output during this recent window proves that the underlying signal logic has maintained efficacy in recent trading environments without suffering from alpha decay or regime misalignment. The continuous generation of positive returns across the 2024–2026 historical horizon reinforces the conclusion that the model's performance is grounded in persistent structural features of DIS price action rather than historical over-fitting.

Strengths and limitations

The strategy DISplays several core quantitative strengths, balanced by specific structural limitations that institutional and systematic traders must evaluate. Key strengths include a 77.14% win rate, an equity curve unbroken by negative calendar years, an exceptional profit factor of 2.50, and low profit concentration where the top three trades represent only 14.07% of gross profits. Position holding times averaging nearly 10 days allow automated trading bots to avoid high-frequency turnover and micro-structure market noise. Conversely, the primary limitation lies in the total sample size of 105 trades over seven years; while sufficient for baseline statistical evaluation, low frequency demands prolonged patience. Additionally, the magnitude of the single worst trade (-16.49%) relative to the average trade gain (+2.96%) highlights that risk managers employing this algorithm must maintain strict capital allocation rules to withstand single-trade adverse excursions.

DevioLab analytical conclusion

DevioLab ranks this algorithmic strategy #2 for DIS with an overall composite score of 79.27, reflecting its excellent risk-adjusted return profile and long-term consistency. The combination of a high hit rate (77.14%), a moderate maximum drawdown (17.16%), and robust performance in recent history (+95.56% across 30 trades since June 2024) positions this algorithm as a top-tier core logic candidate for deployment within automated trading robots and quantitative execution frameworks. System designers seeking consistent swing-trading exposure on DIS will find this strategy's balanced trade DIStribution highly favorable, provided that trade-sizing protocols appropriately account for low trade frequency and occasional fat-tailed drawdowns on individual losing positions.

Data scope and methodology

All analytical conclusions presented in this article are derived exclusively from historical simulated trade data spanning September 16, 2019, through September 11, 2026. Metrics are calculated on a completed closed-trade basis for the asset symbol DIS on a 15-minute candle interval. Percentage gains, profit factor, drawdown figures, and holding durations reflect backtested performance results and do not represent live execution, actual brokerage account fills, slippage, or transaction fee structures. Past performance is non-deterministic and cannot guarantee future quantitative results. This evaluation is provided for systematic research and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice.

Full strategy analysis