Loading US stock market status…
➜
HOW TO START
Complete the full system setup in just a few minutes.
Open Quick Start Guide →
Public catalog · DEVIOLAB

STRATEGY CATALOG

Explore algorithmic strategies, compare performance and open the complete history of every model.
Each algorithmic strategy corresponds to a real trading agent (Trading Bot) created by the DevioLab team from historical-data testing. It can be used for automated trading through supported exchange APIs — Binance, OKX, Bybit, Gate.io, KuCoin and others as they are enabled — or as a Signal Bot with Telegram and email notifications.
2 · Ticker
⌕
FILTERS
Every selected condition works together
Sector & group filters
EXCHANGE AVAILABILITY
A · Agilent Technologies Inc. (4) AAOI · Applied Optoelectronics Inc. (5) AAPL · Apple Inc. (7) ABBV · AbbVie Inc. (4) ABNB · Airbnb Inc. (4) ABT · Abbott Laboratories (4) ACGL · Arch Capital Group Ltd. (4) ACN · Accenture PLC Class A (4) ADBE · Adobe Inc. (3) ADI · Analog Devices Inc. (4) ADM · Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (4) ADP · Automatic Data Processing Inc. (4) ADSK · Autodesk Inc. (4) AEE · Ameren Corporation (4) AEP · American Electric Power Company, Inc. (4) AES · The AES Corporation (3) AFL · Aflac Incorporated (4) AIG · American International Group, Inc. (4) AIZ · Assurant Inc. (4) AJG · Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (4) AKAM · Akamai Technologies Inc. (4) ALAB · Astera Labs, Inc. (7) ALB · Albemarle Corporation (4) ALGN · Align Technology Inc. (4) ALL · The Allstate Corporation (4) ALLE · Allegion plc (4) ALNY · Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (4) AMAT · Applied Materials Inc. (7) AMCR · Amcor plc (4) AMD · Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (7) AME · AMETEK, Inc. (4) AMGN · Amgen Inc. (2) AMP · Ameriprise Financial Inc. (4) AMT · American Tower Corporation (4) AMZN · Amazon.com Inc. (7) ANET · Arista Networks Inc. (4) AON · Aon plc Class A (4) AOS · A. O. Smith Corporation (4) APA · APA Corporation (4) APD · Air Products and Chemicals Inc. (4) APH · Amphenol Corp. (4) APO · Apollo Global Management Inc. (4) APP · AppLovin Corporation (4) APTV · Aptiv PLC (4) ARE · Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (4) ARES · Ares Management Corp. (4) ARM · Arm Holdings plc ADR (7) ASML · ASML Holding N.V. NY (7) ASTS · AST SpaceMobile Inc. (6) ATO · Atmos Energy Corporation (4) AVGO · Broadcom Inc. (7) AVY · Avery Dennison Corporation (4) AWK · American Water Works Company, Inc. (4) AXON · Axon Enterprise, Inc. (4) AXP · American Express Company (4) AZO · AutoZone, Inc. (4) BA · Boeing Co/The (4) BABA · Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. ADR (6) BAC · Bank of America Corp. (4) BALL · Ball Corporation (4) BAX · Baxter International Inc. (4) BBY · Best Buy Co., Inc. (4) BDX · Becton, Dickinson and Company (4) BE · Bloom Energy Corp. (5) BEN · Franklin Templeton Inc. (4) BF.B · Brown-Forman Corp. (4) BG · Bunge Global SA (4) BIIB · Biogen Inc. (4) BK · The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (4) BKNG · Booking Holdings Inc. (4) BKR · Baker Hughes Company (4) BLDR · Builders FirstSource Inc. (3) BLK · BlackRock Inc. (4) BMNR · BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (5) BMY · Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (3) BNY · Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (3) BR · Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (4) BRK.B · Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B (4) BRO · Brown & Brown Inc. (4) BSX · Boston Scientific Corp. (3) BX · Blackstone Inc. (4) BXP · BXP, Inc. (4) C · Citigroup Inc. (4) CAH · Cardinal Health Inc. (4) CARR · Carrier Global Corp. (4) CASY · Casey's General Stores, Inc. (4) CAT · Caterpillar Inc. (4) CB · Chubb Limited (4) CBOE · Cboe Global Markets Inc. (4) CBRE · CBRE Group Inc. (4) CCEP · Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (4) CCI · Crown Castle Inc. (4) CCL · Carnival Corporation Ltd. (4) CDNS · Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (4) CDW · CDW Corporation (3) CEG · Constellation Energy Corporation (4) CF · CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (4) CFG · Citizens Financial Group Inc. (4) CHD · Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (4) CHRW · C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. (4) CHTR · Charter Communications Inc. (4) CI · The Cigna Group (4) CIEN · Ciena Corporation (4) CINF · Cincinnati Financial Corporation (3) CL · Colgate-Palmolive Co. (4) CLX · The Clorox Company (4) CMCSA · Comcast Corp. (4) CME · CME Group Inc. (4) CMG · Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (4) CMI · Cummins Inc. (4) CMS · CMS Energy Corporation (3) CNC · Centene Corp. (4) CNP · CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (4) COF · Capital One Financial Corp. (4) COHR · Coherent Corp. (7) COIN · Coinbase Global Inc. (3) COO · The Cooper Companies, Inc. (3) COP · ConocoPhillips (4) COR · Cencora Inc. (4) COST · Costco Wholesale Corporation (4) CPAY · Corpay Inc. (4) CPRT · Copart, Inc. (4) CPT · Camden Property Trust (4) CRCL · Circle Internet Group Inc. (5) CRDO · Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (8) CRH · CRH plc (4) CRL · Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (4) CRM · Salesforce, Inc. (4) CRWD · CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (4) CSCO · Cisco Systems Inc. (4) CSGP · CoStar Group, Inc. (4) CSX · CSX Corporation (4) CTAS · Cintas Corporation (4) CTSH · Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. (3) CTVA · Corteva Inc. (4) DELL · Dell Technologies Inc. (6) EWY · iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (6) FLNC · Fluence Energy, Inc. (7) GS · The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (6) HOOD · Robinhood Markets Inc. (7) IBM · International Business Machines Corporation (6) INTC · Intel Corporation (6) IREN · IREN Limited (7) LITE · Lumentum Holdings Inc. (6) META · Meta Platforms Inc. (7) MRVL · Marvell Technology, Inc. (6) MSFT · Microsoft Corporation (7) MSTR · Strategy Inc. (7) MU · Micron Technology Inc. (7) NFLX · Netflix Inc. (8) NOK · Nokia Corporation Sponsored ADR (7) NVDA · NVIDIA Corporation (7) PLTR · Palantir Technologies Inc. (7) PYPL · PayPal Holdings, Inc. (6) QQQ · Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (6) RKLB · Rocket Lab Corporation (4) SKHY · SK hynix Inc. ADR (3) SMCI · Super Micro Computer Inc. (6) SMH · VanEck Semiconductor ETF (4) SNDK · Sandisk Corp. (4) SOXS · Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (3) SPCX · Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (3) TSLA · Tesla, Inc. (6) TSM · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. ADR (5) USAR · USA Rare Earth, Inc. (3)
Selected strategy overview

AVGO · Broadcom Inc.

Stock Universe · global stock market
USD · NASDAQ · XNGS · United States
AVGO 0 +17439.94% 1TRAD-KAM0
Recommended by DevioLab · Core 1 iPrimary DevioLab recommendation: a more protected, smoother and more stable profile focused on risk and drawdown control.
Recommended by DevioLab · Core 2 iMore aggressive DevioLab recommendation: accepts higher risk and deeper drawdowns in exchange for potentially higher returns.
40Trades
92.5%Win rate
+18.36%Avg trade
+302.08%Best trade
-9.97%Worst trade
+1,239.0%Annualized
Strategy analytical profile · 8fd4751bbc2e525d

Quantitative Strategy Analysis: AVGO · AVGO Low-Frequency 15-Minute Algorithmic Model

This analytical report provides an in-depth evaluation of the core algorithmic trading strategy for AVGO on the 15-minute timeframe. Over a multi-year historical dataset spanning September 2019 through September 2026, the model completed 40 trades with a 92.5% win rate, a profit factor of 6.11, and a maximum drawdown of 11.13%. Designed for potential deployment within automated trading bots and algorithmic trading agents, the strategy exhibits an asymmetric payout structure characterized by long holding durations, multi-week execution cycles, and a strong concentration of gains in major trend expansions. The analysis examines how the strategy balances extreme hit-rate consistency against heavy right-tail profitability dependency and recent operational frequency shifts.

Analysis as of 20.09.2026. Strategy data is updated separately.
Read full analysis

Strategy profile

The quantitative model evaluated here represents the primary rank-one algorithmic trading strategy developed for AVGO on the 15-minute time interval. Holding a DevioLab score of 87.93, the strategy operates as a highly selective, trend-capturing system calibrated for equity market structures. Although execution signals and bar calculations take place on a 15-minute chart, the underlying positional behavior is far removed from short-term intraday trading. Instead, the strategy functions as a macro position-building logic that uses granular intraday data to optimize entry and exit timing while maintaining positions across weeks or months. Within automated trading agent architectures and execution trading bots, such design parameters minimize transaction friction by keeping trade frequency low while seeking to capture major institutional momentum moves in AVGO.

Trading rhythm and position duration

A structural examination of the strategy reveals an unusually extended holding profile for a 15-minute execution frame. Over the 7.01-year historical dataset from September 16, 2019, to September 20, 2026, the system recorded a total of 40 completed trades, translating to an average frequency of 5.70 trades per year or roughly 1.29 trades per active month. Position duration spans a mean holding time of 1142.19 hours, or approximately 47.6 days, whereas the median holding duration sits at 441.00 hours, or about 18.4 days. This substantial divergence between mean and median holding times indicates that while routine trades resolve within two to three weeks, a subset of winning trades is retained for many months to capture long-term trend extensions. The time between trade exits reflects a similar pattern, averaging 61.08 days with a median of 28.99 days, confirming that the strategy experiences long quiescent phases between execution cycles.

Quality of historical results

The quantitative metrics demonstrate exceptional win consistency paired with positive payout asymmetry. Out of 40 closed trades, 37 resulted in positive returns, yielding a win rate of 92.50% against just 3 losing trades. The strategy achieved a overall profit factor of 6.11, supported by an average trade return of 18.34%. However, comparing the average trade return to the median trade return of 8.79% reveals significant right-tail skewness. The maximum single winning trade generated 302.08%, whereas the worst trade incurred a loss of -9.97%. Furthermore, the top three winning trades collectively account for 51.27% of total gross profit. This structural reality shows that while the baseline strategy produces reliable moderate gains across most trades, overall multi-year performance is heavily amplified by a tiny cluster of exceptionally large trend trades.

Risk, drawdown and losing behavior

Risk control metrics across the seven-year evaluation window show remarkable stability. The strategy recorded a maximum peak-to-trough drawdown of 11.13%, a restrained figure given the long holding periods and cumulative return profile. The worst single trade loss was limited to -9.97%, demonstrating effective structural risk boundaries when market conditions invalidate the signal thesis. The longest consecutive losing streak observed in the dataset was a single trade, meaning the strategy never experienced back-to-back losses during the tested history. Conversely, the longest winning streak reached 17 trades. The low drawdown figure relative to holding time suggests that positions were entered during favorable market regimes, limiting equity volatility during open position holding windows.

Behavior through time and yearly stability

An annual breakdown of strategy performance reveals two distinct operational phases. From 2020 through 2022, the strategy operated with extreme selectivity, completing exactly one trade per calendar year. In 2020, a single position yielded 11.87%; in 2021, one single trade captured the strategy's peak 302.08% return; and in 2022, one trade produced 10.05%. Beginning in 2023, signal frequency increased noticeably, with 3 trades yielding 81.85% in 2023, 8 trades yielding 133.81% in 2024, 16 trades yielding 131.49% in 2025 (with 14 wins and 2 losses), and 10 trades yielding 62.60% in 2026 (9 wins and 1 loss). Every single calendar year recorded a 100% win rate until 2025, where the win rate settled at 87.50%, followed by 90.00% in 2026. This temporal progression indicates that while trade density expanded in later years, accuracy remained high.

Recent period since 2024-06-01 versus full history

Comparing performance since June 1, 2024, against the complete sample highlights an acceleration in trading activity. Of the 40 total trades executed over seven years, 31 closed on or after June 1, 2024. These recent 31 trades generated a cumulative return sum of 297.86%. This concentration means that 77.5% of all historical trade exits occurred within the final two-plus years of the dataset. This increase in trade frequency took place without disrupting structural performance: the post-June 2024 window absorbed all three historical losses while maintaining a high overall win rate and generating substantial return capital. The historical record demonstrates that recent strategy performance rests on a much higher sample volume than the sparse initial years.

Strengths and limitations

The primary analytical strength of this strategy lies in its high win rate of 92.50%, strong profit factor of 6.11, and contained maximum drawdown of 11.13%. The extended position holding times reduce exposure to short-term market noise and high execution costs. However, several statistical trade-offs and limitations require consideration. First, the profit distribution exhibits severe concentration: with 51.27% of gross profits tied to the top three trades and a median trade return of 8.79% versus a 302.08% max win, future strategy efficiency depends heavily on capturing rare macro trends. Second, the small total sample size of 40 trades over seven years means that statistical parameters carry wider margin boundaries than high-frequency models. Finally, the shift from 1 trade per year in early periods to 16 trades per year in recent periods indicates evolving sensitivity to asset volatility regimes.

DevioLab analytical conclusion

With a DevioLab score of 87.93 and a number-one rank for AVGO, this quantitative model presents a robust profile characterized by patient trend capture and disciplined risk metrics. Its low trade frequency and multi-week holding behavior make it well-suited for integration into automated trading bots or trading agents designed for medium-term position management rather than intraday scalping. The high hit rate provides capital protection during choppy markets, while the asymmetric payout architecture ensures participation in major upward trends. Operators evaluating this logic should account for the strategy's concentration in outlier winning trades and recognize that long holding times require patience through multi-week equity consolidation phases.

Data scope and methodology

All metrics presented in this report are derived directly from backtested simulated historical trade executions for AVGO on the 15-minute timeframe covering the period from September 16, 2019, to September 20, 2026. Performance statistics reflect closed trade evaluations and do not account for slippage, order routing delays, exchange fees, or overnight financing costs. Historical backtested results do not guarantee future performance, and these data should be interpreted strictly as quantitative strategy research rather than personalized financial or investment advice.

Full strategy analysis