Loading US stock market status…
➜
HOW TO START
Complete the full system setup in just a few minutes.
Open Quick Start Guide →
Public catalog · DEVIOLAB

TRADING STRATEGIES & BOTS

Choose a trading strategy and activate a bot that will trade automatically by its rules.
A strategy defines the buying and selling rules. A trading bot executes those rules through the API of a supported exchange. You can also use the selected strategy as a signal bot with Telegram and email notifications.
FILTERS
Choose Core 1 for a balanced start, select an exchange for trading and find the ticker you need. Filters work together.
Sector & group filters
Trading exchange?Shows instruments available for SPOT trading against USDT according to the latest normalization. Click the selected exchange again to show all exchanges.
A · Agilent Technologies Inc. (4) AAOI · Applied Optoelectronics Inc. (5) AAPL · Apple Inc. (7) ABBV · AbbVie Inc. (4) ABNB · Airbnb Inc. (4) ABT · Abbott Laboratories (4) ACGL · Arch Capital Group Ltd. (4) ACN · Accenture PLC Class A (4) ADBE · Adobe Inc. (3) ADI · Analog Devices Inc. (4) ADM · Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (4) ADP · Automatic Data Processing Inc. (4) ADSK · Autodesk Inc. (4) AEE · Ameren Corporation (4) AEP · American Electric Power Company, Inc. (4) AES · The AES Corporation (3) AFL · Aflac Incorporated (4) AIG · American International Group, Inc. (4) AIZ · Assurant Inc. (4) AJG · Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (4) AKAM · Akamai Technologies Inc. (4) ALAB · Astera Labs, Inc. (7) ALB · Albemarle Corporation (4) ALGN · Align Technology Inc. (4) ALL · The Allstate Corporation (3) ALLE · Allegion plc (4) ALNY · Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (4) AMAT · Applied Materials Inc. (6) AMCR · Amcor plc (4) AMD · Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (7) AME · AMETEK, Inc. (4) AMGN · Amgen Inc. (2) AMP · Ameriprise Financial Inc. (4) AMT · American Tower Corporation (4) AMZN · Amazon.com Inc. (7) ANET · Arista Networks Inc. (4) AON · Aon plc Class A (4) AOS · A. O. Smith Corporation (4) APA · APA Corporation (4) APD · Air Products and Chemicals Inc. (4) APH · Amphenol Corp. (4) APO · Apollo Global Management Inc. (4) APP · AppLovin Corporation (4) APTV · Aptiv PLC (4) ARE · Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (4) ARES · Ares Management Corp. (4) ARM · Arm Holdings plc ADR (7) ASML · ASML Holding N.V. NY (7) ASTS · AST SpaceMobile Inc. (6) ATO · Atmos Energy Corporation (4) AVGO · Broadcom Inc. (7) AVY · Avery Dennison Corporation (4) AWK · American Water Works Company, Inc. (4) AXON · Axon Enterprise, Inc. (4) AXP · American Express Company (4) AZO · AutoZone, Inc. (4) BA · Boeing Co/The (4) BABA · Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. ADR (6) BAC · Bank of America Corp. (4) BALL · Ball Corporation (4) BAX · Baxter International Inc. (4) BBY · Best Buy Co., Inc. (4) BDX · Becton, Dickinson and Company (4) BE · Bloom Energy Corp. (5) BEN · Franklin Templeton Inc. (4) BF.B · Brown-Forman Corp. (4) BG · Bunge Global SA (4) BIIB · Biogen Inc. (4) BK · The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (4) BKNG · Booking Holdings Inc. (4) BKR · Baker Hughes Company (4) BLDR · Builders FirstSource Inc. (3) BLK · BlackRock Inc. (4) BMNR · BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (5) BMY · Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (3) BNY · Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (3) BR · Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (4) BRK.B · Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B (4) BRO · Brown & Brown Inc. (4) BSX · Boston Scientific Corp. (3) BX · Blackstone Inc. (4) BXP · BXP, Inc. (4) C · Citigroup Inc. (4) CAH · Cardinal Health Inc. (4) CARR · Carrier Global Corp. (4) CASY · Casey's General Stores, Inc. (4) CAT · Caterpillar Inc. (4) CB · Chubb Limited (4) CBOE · Cboe Global Markets Inc. (4) CBRE · CBRE Group Inc. (4) CCEP · Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (4) CCI · Crown Castle Inc. (4) CCL · Carnival Corporation Ltd. (4) CDNS · Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (4) CDW · CDW Corporation (3) CEG · Constellation Energy Corporation (4) CF · CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (4) CFG · Citizens Financial Group Inc. (4) CHD · Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (4) CHRW · C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. (4) CHTR · Charter Communications Inc. (4) CI · The Cigna Group (4) CIEN · Ciena Corporation (4) CINF · Cincinnati Financial Corporation (3) CL · Colgate-Palmolive Co. (4) CLX · The Clorox Company (4) CMCSA · Comcast Corp. (4) CME · CME Group Inc. (4) CMG · Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (4) CMI · Cummins Inc. (4) CMS · CMS Energy Corporation (3) CNC · Centene Corp. (4) CNP · CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (4) COF · Capital One Financial Corp. (4) COHR · Coherent Corp. (7) COIN · Coinbase Global Inc. (3) COO · The Cooper Companies, Inc. (3) COP · ConocoPhillips (4) COR · Cencora Inc. (4) COST · Costco Wholesale Corporation (4) CPAY · Corpay Inc. (4) CPRT · Copart, Inc. (4) CPT · Camden Property Trust (4) CRCL · Circle Internet Group Inc. (5) CRDO · Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (8) CRH · CRH plc (4) CRL · Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (4) CRM · Salesforce, Inc. (4) CRWD · CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (4) CSCO · Cisco Systems Inc. (4) CSGP · CoStar Group, Inc. (4) CSX · CSX Corporation (4) CTAS · Cintas Corporation (4) CTSH · Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. (3) CTVA · Corteva Inc. (4) CVNA · Carvana Co. (4) CVS · CVS Health Corporation (4) CVX · Chevron Corp. (4) D · Dominion Energy, Inc. (4) DELL · Dell Technologies Inc. (6) EWY · iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (6) FLNC · Fluence Energy, Inc. (7) GS · The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (6) HOOD · Robinhood Markets Inc. (7) IBM · International Business Machines Corporation (6) INTC · Intel Corporation (6) IREN · IREN Limited (7) LITE · Lumentum Holdings Inc. (6) META · Meta Platforms Inc. (7) MRVL · Marvell Technology, Inc. (6) MSFT · Microsoft Corporation (7) MSTR · Strategy Inc. (7) MU · Micron Technology Inc. (7) NFLX · Netflix Inc. (8) NOK · Nokia Corporation Sponsored ADR (7) NVDA · NVIDIA Corporation (7) PLTR · Palantir Technologies Inc. (7) PYPL · PayPal Holdings, Inc. (6) QQQ · Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (5) RKLB · Rocket Lab Corporation (4) SKHY · SK hynix Inc. ADR (3) SMCI · Super Micro Computer Inc. (6) SMH · VanEck Semiconductor ETF (4) SNDK · Sandisk Corp. (4) SOXS · Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (3) SPCX · Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (3) TSLA · Tesla, Inc. (6) TSM · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. ADR (5) USAR · USA Rare Earth, Inc. (3)
Selected strategy overview

AXON · Axon Enterprise, Inc.

Stock Universe · global stock market
USD · NASDAQ · XNGS · United States
AXON 0 +2704.71% 1TRAD-VWG4
19Trades
73.7%Win rate
+22.71%Avg trade
+114.42%Best trade
-27.66%Worst trade
+493.0%Annualized
Strategy analytical profile · c91728255dc19e52

AXON · AXON Quantitative Strategy Analysis: Macro Position Duration and Outlier-Driven Gains on a 15-Minute Base Framework

This analytical report evaluates an algorithmic trading model developed for AXON (AXON Enterprise) evaluated across a 5.59-year historical dataset spanning from February 2021 to September 2026. Despite executing on a 15-minute chart intraday interval, the system exhibits an ultra-low trade frequency, closing just 19 trades over the multi-year history, which translates to roughly 3.4 trades per year. The strategy achieves a overall return of +2704.71% with a win rate of 73.68% and an extraordinary profit factor of 6.25. However, statistical evaluation reveals that position holding times are extended, averaging 1,948.81 hours (approximately 81.2 days), and gross profit is moderately concentrated, with the top three winning trades generating 52.20% of total gains. While recent performance since June 2024 accounts for 11 of the 19 total trades and +239.95% in cumulative sum, the low overall sample size requires careful statistical consideration regarding signal stability and future regime robustness.

Analysis as of 21.09.2026. Strategy data is updated separately.
Read full analysis

Strategy profile

The quantitative trading model evaluated here targets AXON (AXON Enterprise) in equity markets, utilizing a 15-minute candlestick chart interval as its baseline data structure. Over a historical backtest span of 5.59 years—from February 16, 2021, to September 21, 2026—the system completed a total of 19 trades. Generating a cumulative net return of +2704.71% and an annualized equivalent figure of 536.08%, the strategy achieves a DevioLab score of 63.88, ranking it third among evaluated models for this ticker. Designed to function as the decision architecture for automated trading bots, trading robots, or quantitative execution agents, the logic filters out intraday noise to capture extended structural price moves. Rather than engaging in frequent turnover, the model acts as a highly selective trend-following or momentum-positioning agent, requiring significant confluence before triggering trade executions.

Trading rhythm and position duration

A compelling structural paradox of this strategy is the contrast between its 15-minute operational interval and its long-term holding horizon. Although technical price inputs are sampled every 15 minutes, the execution frequency remains exceptionally low at 3.4 trades per year, or approximately one trade per active month. Position durations reflect a macro swing or position trading style: the average holding time spans 1,948.81 hours (roughly 81.2 days), while the median holding duration reaches 1,366.75 hours (approximately 57.0 days). Furthermore, the temporal spacing between closed trades is wide, with an average of 110.33 days and a median of 82.41 days between position exits. This confirms that the strategy is designed not for short-term scalping or high-frequency intraday flipping, but for riding long-term corporate trends while remaining entirely cash-bound during unfavorable market regimes.

Quality of historical results

The statistical distribution of return outcomes highlights high payoff efficiency combined with significant trade-level tail skewness. Out of 19 closed transactions, 14 were profitable while 5 resulted in losses, yielding a win rate of 73.68%. The strategy achieves a remarkably high profit factor of 6.25, indicating that gross historical gains exceeded gross losses by more than sixfold. The average closed trade realized +22.98%, whereas the median trade realized +14.67%, demonstrating a positive rightward skew where top-performing trades pulled the mean well above the median. The strategy's single best trade produced a +114.42% gain, while the worst trade incurred a loss of -22.40%. A key quality insight resides in profit concentration: the three largest winning trades collectively accounted for 52.20% of the gross cumulative profit. While the win rate is high, gross returns remain heavily dependent on capturing rare, outsized trend expansions.

Risk, drawdown and losing behavior

Risk metrics across the 5.59-year historical sample reflect moderate peak-to-trough drawdowns alongside well-contained losing streaks. The historical maximum drawdown recorded for the portfolio equity curve was 22.40%, which closely matches the strategy's worst individual trade loss of -22.40%. Over the course of the backtest, the longest consecutive losing streak was capped at just 2 trades, whereas the longest winning streak extended to 12 consecutive trades. The ability to avoid prolonged losing runs supported equity curve stability during expansionary phases. However, because positions remain active for an average of 81 days, an open drawdown can persist over several calendar months before a position closes. Traders deploying automated trading agents with this architecture must possess the psychological tolerance required to hold positions through multi-month price swings without premature manual interventions.

Behavior through time and yearly stability

Evaluating yearly historical performance reveals a distinct evolution in trade cadence and profitability. In 2021, the strategy recorded a single losing trade of -1.34% (0% win rate). The year 2022 generated 2 trades with a 50% win rate and a slight net profit sum of +3.39%. The model hit its primary growth surge in 2023 and 2024: 2023 produced 3 trades, all winners (100% win rate), accumulating +148.94%, while 2024 saw 6 trades, all winners (100% win rate), generating +162.35%. In 2025, trade frequency moderated to 3 completed trades (2 wins, 1 loss) for a net sum of +83.35% (66.67% win rate). In the partial year of 2026 up to September, 4 trades were completed (2 wins, 2 losses), generating +39.96% (50% win rate). Overall, performance was highly concentrated during the 2023–2025 expansion, demonstrating that cumulative returns were driven by specific multi-year macro trends rather than uniform annual distributions.

Recent period since 2024-06-01 versus full history

Examining performance during the recent sample window from June 1, 2024, to September 21, 2026, provides valuable context regarding the model's recent behavior. Of the 19 completed trades in the overall dataset, 11 trades completed within this recent window. These 11 recent trades produced a combined sum of +239.95%, representing a substantial portion of the overall +2704.71% total baseline profit. This indicates that trade generation accelerated significantly in the latter half of the backtest window compared to the quiet 2021–2022 period. The high concentration of recent closed trades reflects an active environment for the strategy's entry criteria over the past two years, validating that the underlying logic remained functional and responsive during recent market regimes without structural degradation.

Strengths and limitations

The primary analytical strengths of this strategy include its high win rate (73.68%), exceptional profit factor (6.25%), capped losing streaks (maximum 2 consecutive losses), and low transaction frequency that inherently minimizes trade-related exposure. Furthermore, the 12-trade winning streak demonstrates an capability to compound capital during sustained trend regimes. Conversely, the model presents clear statistical limitations. With only 19 completed trades across 5.59 years, the small sample size introduces statistical sensitivity, where individual trade outcomes heavily weight summary metrics. Additionally, top-heavy profit distribution—with the top three trades generating 52.20% of gross gains—means that missing a small fraction of winning signals would severely impair historical performance. Long holding durations also subject positions to overnight gap risk and multi-month holding stress.

DevioLab analytical conclusion

The AXON 15-minute quantitative strategy represents an ultra-selective trend-capturing system optimized for long-horizon position holding. Achieving a DevioLab score of 63.88 and ranking third for the AXON ticker, the strategy demonstrates how fine-grained 15-minute price monitoring can be harnessed to execute low-frequency, high-payoff positions. While an overall gain of +2704.71% and a profit factor of 6.25 demonstrate exceptional backtested efficiency, deployment via trading bots or execution agents requires strict adherence to system parameters. Capital allocators must recognize that long-term performance rests upon enduring extended holding periods averaging over 80 days and accepting performance reliance on rare outlier wins. Appropriately sized capital and patient risk management remain essential when implementing this logic.

Data scope and methodology

This analysis is based entirely on historical backtested strategy data for AXON over the period from February 16, 2021, to September 21, 2026. All statistics, including return percentages, holding durations, win rates, drawdowns, and trade counts, represent simulated closed transactions calculated without embedded assumptions regarding live brokerage slippage, variable order execution fees, or margin interest. The recent sub-period statistics represent trades with closed timestamps on or after June 1, 2024 UTC. Historical backtest performance is an analytical tool for evaluating strategic edge and market fit; it does not constitute financial advice, nor does it guarantee equivalent future profitability in live market conditions.

Full strategy analysis