Status des US-Aktienmarkts wird geladen…
➜
SO STARTEN SIE
Schließen Sie die vollständige Systemeinrichtung in wenigen Minuten ab.
Schnellstart-Anleitung öffnen →
Öffentlicher Katalog · DEVIOLAB

TRADING-STRATEGIEN UND BOTS

Wählen Sie eine Trading-Strategie und aktivieren Sie einen Bot, der automatisch nach ihren Regeln handelt.
Eine Strategie legt die Kauf- und Verkaufsregeln fest. Ein Trading-Bot führt sie über die API einer unterstützten Börse aus. Sie können die gewählte Strategie auch als Signal-Bot mit Telegram- und E-Mail-Benachrichtigungen nutzen.
FILTER
Wählen Sie Core 1 für einen ausgewogenen Start, wählen Sie eine Börse für den Handel und finden Sie den gewünschten Ticker. Die Filter wirken zusammen.
Sektor- und Gruppenfilter
Handelsbörse?Zeigt laut letzter Normalisierung Instrumente für SPOT-Handel gegen USDT. Klicken Sie erneut auf die gewählte Börse, um alle Börsen anzuzeigen.
A · Agilent Technologies Inc. (4) AAOI · Applied Optoelectronics Inc. (5) AAPL · Apple Inc. (7) ABBV · AbbVie Inc. (4) ABNB · Airbnb Inc. (4) ABT · Abbott Laboratories (4) ACGL · Arch Capital Group Ltd. (4) ACN · Accenture PLC Class A (4) ADBE · Adobe Inc. (3) ADI · Analog Devices Inc. (4) ADM · Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (4) ADP · Automatic Data Processing Inc. (4) ADSK · Autodesk Inc. (4) AEE · Ameren Corporation (4) AEP · American Electric Power Company, Inc. (4) AES · The AES Corporation (3) AFL · Aflac Incorporated (4) AIG · American International Group, Inc. (4) AIZ · Assurant Inc. (4) AJG · Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (4) AKAM · Akamai Technologies Inc. (4) ALAB · Astera Labs, Inc. (7) ALB · Albemarle Corporation (4) ALGN · Align Technology Inc. (4) ALL · The Allstate Corporation (4) ALLE · Allegion plc (4) ALNY · Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (4) AMAT · Applied Materials Inc. (7) AMCR · Amcor plc (4) AMD · Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (7) AME · AMETEK, Inc. (4) AMGN · Amgen Inc. (2) AMP · Ameriprise Financial Inc. (4) AMT · American Tower Corporation (4) AMZN · Amazon.com Inc. (7) ANET · Arista Networks Inc. (4) AON · Aon plc Class A (4) AOS · A. O. Smith Corporation (4) APA · APA Corporation (4) APD · Air Products and Chemicals Inc. (4) APH · Amphenol Corp. (4) APO · Apollo Global Management Inc. (4) APP · AppLovin Corporation (4) APTV · Aptiv PLC (4) ARE · Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (4) ARES · Ares Management Corp. (4) ARM · Arm Holdings plc ADR (7) ASML · ASML Holding N.V. NY (7) ASTS · AST SpaceMobile Inc. (6) ATO · Atmos Energy Corporation (4) AVGO · Broadcom Inc. (7) AVY · Avery Dennison Corporation (4) AWK · American Water Works Company, Inc. (4) AXON · Axon Enterprise, Inc. (4) AXP · American Express Company (4) AZO · AutoZone, Inc. (4) BA · Boeing Co/The (4) BABA · Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. ADR (6) BAC · Bank of America Corp. (4) BALL · Ball Corporation (4) BAX · Baxter International Inc. (4) BBY · Best Buy Co., Inc. (4) BDX · Becton, Dickinson and Company (4) BE · Bloom Energy Corp. (5) BEN · Franklin Templeton Inc. (4) BF.B · Brown-Forman Corp. (4) BG · Bunge Global SA (4) BIIB · Biogen Inc. (3) BK · The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (4) BKNG · Booking Holdings Inc. (4) BKR · Baker Hughes Company (4) BLDR · Builders FirstSource Inc. (3) BLK · BlackRock Inc. (4) BMNR · BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (5) BMY · Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (3) BNY · Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (4) BR · Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (4) BRK.B · Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B (4) BRO · Brown & Brown Inc. (4) BSX · Boston Scientific Corp. (3) BX · Blackstone Inc. (4) BXP · BXP, Inc. (4) C · Citigroup Inc. (4) CAH · Cardinal Health Inc. (4) CARR · Carrier Global Corp. (4) CASY · Casey's General Stores, Inc. (4) CAT · Caterpillar Inc. (4) CB · Chubb Limited (4) CBOE · Cboe Global Markets Inc. (4) CBRE · CBRE Group Inc. (4) CCEP · Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (4) CCI · Crown Castle Inc. (4) CCL · Carnival Corporation Ltd. (4) CDNS · Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (4) CDW · CDW Corporation (3) CEG · Constellation Energy Corporation (4) CF · CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (4) CFG · Citizens Financial Group Inc. (4) CHD · Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (4) CHRW · C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. (4) CHTR · Charter Communications Inc. (4) CI · The Cigna Group (4) CIEN · Ciena Corporation (4) CINF · Cincinnati Financial Corporation (3) CL · Colgate-Palmolive Co. (4) CLX · The Clorox Company (4) CMCSA · Comcast Corp. (4) CME · CME Group Inc. (4) CMG · Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (4) CMI · Cummins Inc. (4) CMS · CMS Energy Corporation (3) CNC · Centene Corp. (4) CNP · CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (4) COF · Capital One Financial Corp. (4) COHR · Coherent Corp. (7) COIN · Coinbase Global Inc. (3) COO · The Cooper Companies, Inc. (4) COP · ConocoPhillips (4) COR · Cencora Inc. (4) COST · Costco Wholesale Corporation (4) CPAY · Corpay Inc. (4) CPRT · Copart, Inc. (4) CPT · Camden Property Trust (4) CRCL · Circle Internet Group Inc. (5) CRDO · Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (8) CRH · CRH plc (4) CRL · Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (4) CRM · Salesforce, Inc. (4) CRWD · CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (4) CSCO · Cisco Systems Inc. (4) CSGP · CoStar Group, Inc. (4) CSX · CSX Corporation (4) CTAS · Cintas Corporation (4) CTSH · Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. (3) CTVA · Corteva Inc. (3) CVNA · Carvana Co. (4) CVS · CVS Health Corporation (4) CVX · Chevron Corp. (4) D · Dominion Energy, Inc. (4) DAL · Delta Air Lines, Inc. (4) DASH · DoorDash, Inc. (4) DD · DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (4) DDOG · Datadog Inc. Class A (4) DE · Deere & Company (4) DECK · Deckers Outdoor Corporation (4) DELL · Dell Technologies Inc. (7) DG · Dollar General Corp. (4) DGX · Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (4) DHI · D.R. Horton, Inc. (4) DHR · Danaher Corp. (4) DIS · The Walt Disney Company (4) DLR · Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (4) DLTR · Dollar Tree Inc. (4) DOC · Healthpeak Properties, Inc. (4) DOV · Dover Corporation (4) DOW · Dow Inc. (4) DPZ · Domino's Pizza, Inc. (4) DRI · Darden Restaurants, Inc. (4) DTE · DTE Energy Company (4) DUK · Duke Energy Corporation (4) DVA · DaVita Inc. (4) DVN · Devon Energy Corporation (4) DXCM · DexCom Inc. (4) EBAY · eBay Inc. (4) ECHO · EchoStar Corp. (4) ECL · Ecolab Inc. (4) ED · Consolidated Edison Inc. (4) EFX · Equifax Inc. (4) EG · Everest Group, Ltd. (4) EIX · Edison International (4) EL · The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (4) ELV · Elevance Health, Inc. (4) EME · EMCOR Group, Inc. (4) EMR · Emerson Electric Co. (4) EOG · EOG Resources, Inc. (4) EQIX · Equinix, Inc. (4) ERIE · Erie Indemnity Company (4) EWY · iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (6) FLNC · Fluence Energy, Inc. (7) GS · The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (6) HOOD · Robinhood Markets Inc. (7) IBM · International Business Machines Corporation (6) INTC · Intel Corporation (6) IREN · IREN Limited (6) LITE · Lumentum Holdings Inc. (5) META · Meta Platforms Inc. (6) MRVL · Marvell Technology, Inc. (6) MSFT · Microsoft Corporation (7) MSTR · Strategy Inc. (7) MU · Micron Technology Inc. (7) NFLX · Netflix Inc. (8) NOK · Nokia Corporation Sponsored ADR (6) NVDA · NVIDIA Corporation (7) PLTR · Palantir Technologies Inc. (8) PYPL · PayPal Holdings, Inc. (6) QQQ · Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (6) RKLB · Rocket Lab Corporation (4) SKHY · SK hynix Inc. ADR (3) SMCI · Super Micro Computer Inc. (5) SMH · VanEck Semiconductor ETF (4) SNDK · Sandisk Corp. (4) SOXS · Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (3) SPCX · Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (3) TSLA · Tesla, Inc. (6) TSM · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. ADR (4) USAR · USA Rare Earth, Inc. (2)
Übersicht der ausgewählten Strategie

DHR · Danaher Corp.

Stock Universe · globaler Aktienmarkt
USD · NYSE · XNYS · United States
DHR 0 +2292.97% 1TRAD-LVI1
Von DevioLab empfohlen · Core 1 iJeder Ticker — ein Kryptopaar oder eine Aktie/ein ETF — kann mehrere Strategien mit unterschiedlicher Handelsfrequenz und unterschiedlichem Risiko haben. Core 1 ist die wichtigste, ausgewogenste DevioLab-Auswahl für diesen Ticker: Das System legt Wert auf Risiko- und Drawdown-Kontrolle. Dies ist die bevorzugte Wahl zum Einstieg. Sie können auch eine konservativere oder aggressivere Strategie wählen, indem Sie unten Trades und Charts vergleichen.
114Trades
77.2%Trefferquote
+3.18%Ø Trade
+19.78%Bester Trade
-16.21%Schlechtester Trade
+163.2%Annualisiert
Analytisches Strategieprofil · 9a95e66193381a43

DHR Quantitative Analysis: Examining a High-Precision 15-Minute Algorithmic Strategy for Danaher

This quantitative evaluation analyzes a 15-minute core algorithmic trading strategy engineered for Danaher Corporation (DHR). Spanning a 7.08-year evaluation window from September 2019 to October 2026, the strategy executed 114 closed trades, achieving a 77.19% win rate, a Profit Factor of 6.25, and a cumulative return sum of +2292.97%. Designed for deployment in automated trading bots and algorithmic agents, the system combines selective low-frequency entry execution with multi-day holding durations. Notably, the top three winning trades account for only 11.88% of gross profits, indicating that historical returns stem from consistent payout distribution rather than extreme tail outliers. With a maximum drawdown capped at 16.21% and a maximum losing streak of just two trades, the strategy demonstrates remarkable downside containment alongside resilient multi-year performance across varying equity market environments.

Analyse vom 19.10.2026. Die Strategiedaten werden separat aktualisiert.
Vollständige Analyse lesen

1. Strategy profile

The quantitative strategy evaluated here is a core intraday-sampled model tailored specifically for Danaher Corporation (DHR), operating on a 15-minute price bar structure. Classified within DevioLab's system architecture as a balanced core model ranking second overall for DHR with a DevioLab score of 79.14, the algorithm translates high-frequency bar data into selective swing positions. Over a backtested dataset spanning 7.08 years from September 16, 2019, through October 15, 2026, the model completed 114 trades, generating a total cumulative closed trade gain of +2292.97%. On an annualized basis, this yields a sum-based metric of 163.22%. Designed to function as decision logic for automated trading bots, trading robots, and quantitative agents, the strategy filters noise from short-term equity pricing while retaining precise signal timing. The primary profile reflects a high-conviction framework where trade generation is deliberate, averaging approximately 16 trades per year and 1.63 trades per active month. Rather than chasing intra-session scalping opportunities, the system leverages 15-minute granularity to identify high-probability structure points that evolve into multi-day trend holdings.

2. Trading rhythm and position duration

A critical structural feature of this algorithmic strategy is the operational divergence between its 15-minute signal frequency and its holding durations. While bar evaluations occur every 15 minutes during market hours, position management reflects a patient swing-trading methodology. The average holding duration across all completed historical trades is 325.21 hours (approximately 13.55 trading days), whereas the median holding duration stands at 215.88 hours (roughly 8.99 trading days). This right-skewed distribution in holding times indicates that while most trades reach resolution in under nine trading days, select positions are allowed to run for multiple weeks when structural trends remain intact. Furthermore, the spacing between closed positions reveals a measured operational rhythm. The strategy averages 22.72 days between trade exits, with a median exit interval of 19.11 days. For automated execution infrastructure, such as algorithmic trading robots or autonomous trading agents, this spacing minimizes execution overhead and portfolio turnover, providing a disciplined structure that avoids overtrading during chop or tight consolidation.

3. Quality of historical results

The strategy's payout mechanics display exceptional structural quality across its historical dataset. Of the 114 closed positions, 88 ended in profit while 26 resulted in losses, translating to a win rate of 77.19%. The overall Profit Factor reaches 6.25, reflecting a substantial ratio of total gross gains relative to total gross losses. Analyzing individual trade statistics reinforces this strength: the average trade return is +3.18%, closely tracking the median trade return of +3.48%. The symmetry between average and median expectations indicates a stable return distribution without heavy reliance on anomalous windfalls. The single best historical trade delivered a gain of +19.78%, while the single worst trade registered a loss of -16.21%. Crucially, the top three winning trades combined represent only 11.88% of total gross profit. This low concentration metric demonstrates that the strategy's profitability is broad-based, deriving from repetitive, moderate-sized winning trades across multiple market cycles rather than a few isolated market events.

4. Risk, drawdown and losing behavior

Risk management metrics within the strategy showcase notable structural stability. The maximum historical drawdown recorded across the entire 7.08-year history was limited to 16.21%, a figure that directly mirrors the magnitude of the strategy's worst single trade (-16.21%). This alignment suggests that equity curve drawdowns were primarily driven by individual trade risk containment rather than compound loss accumulation across consecutive open positions. The strategy's serial loss behavior further supports this conclusion: the longest historical losing streak was capped at just 2 consecutive trades. In contrast, the longest winning streak extended to 9 consecutive trades. This asymmetric streak profile suggests that losing cycles are quickly halted, preventing capital erosion from escalating. By maintaining a 77.19% win rate alongside brief losing sequences, the strategy effectively limits capital depletion, reducing historical psychological and operational stress for automated trading systems.

5. Behavior through time and yearly stability

Examining performance across individual calendar years demonstrates persistent consistency across varying macroeconomic conditions for DHR. The strategy delivered positive closed returns in every single year from 2019 through 2026. In 2019, across a partial initial dataset of 4 trades, the system achieved a 100% win rate and +18.98% return. During the volatile market regime of 2020, trade frequency expanded to 16 trades, yielding 13 wins (81.25% win rate) and a peak annual closed return of +92.87%. The momentum continued into 2021 with 12 trades, 9 wins (75.00% win rate), and +62.51% sum return. Even during challenging equity market headwinds in 2022 and 2023, the system maintained positive total returns of +33.60% (17 trades, 64.71% win rate) and +27.11% (18 trades, 72.22% win rate), respectively. The subsequent years reinforced this trajectory: 2024 generated +32.74% across 13 trades (84.62% win rate), 2025 delivered +46.28% across 19 trades (73.68% win rate), and 2026 registered +48.93% across 15 trades (86.67% win rate). This multi-year breakdown confirms that return generation is evenly distributed over time rather than concentrated in a single fortunate market regime.

6. Recent period since 2024-06-01 versus full history

Evaluating recent historical performance from June 1, 2024, to October 15, 2026, provides insight into the algorithm's ongoing operational alignment. Within this sub-window of completed trades, the strategy executed 43 closed positions, generating a cumulative closed trade sum of +112.59%. This sample represents 37.7% of all lifetime trades executed by the system over its 7.08-year history, indicating an active trade frequency in recent years. Comparing recent efficiency against full-history statistics reveals sustained signal validity. The average return per trade in the recent period is approximately +2.62%, aligning closely with the full historical baseline average of +3.18%. The robust performance during this recent timeframe confirms that the strategy's signal logic has maintained efficacy without experiencing structural decay or signal breakdown in modern trading regimes.

7. Strengths and limitations

The primary analytical strengths of this algorithmic strategy center on its high win rate (77.19%), exceptionally high Profit Factor (6.25%), and broad profit distribution, evidenced by the top three winners accounting for under 12% of gross profits. Furthermore, its minimal drawdown profile (16.21%) and short maximum losing streak (2 trades) highlight strong risk-mitigation features suitable for automated trading bots and quantitative execution engines. Conversely, structural limitations must be acknowledged. With a total sample size of 114 trades over 7.08 years, the trade sample is deliberate and low-frequency. Traders utilizing automated trading agents must tolerate extended idle periods, as exits average over 22 days apart. Additionally, while median holding durations sit around 9 days, positions can extend beyond two weeks, requiring sustained equity exposure during broader market swings and gap risk.

8. DevioLab analytical conclusion

The DHR 15-minute core strategy presents a highly refined, low-frequency swing framework for Danaher equity trading. Garnering a DevioLab score of 79.14 and securing the #2 ranking for the DHR ticker, the algorithm balances strong gain capture with strict downside boundary controls. The statistical profile demonstrates that long-term outperformance relies on a disciplined hit rate combined with moderate, consistent gains per trade, rather than volatile, high-leverage tail-risk bets. The structural stability observed across seven consecutive profitable years, combined with robust post-June 2024 execution results, confirms that the strategy's core logic offers a viable historical benchmark for quantitative traders and automated trading agents seeking controlled equity exposure.

9. Data scope and methodology

All statistics presented in this report derive directly from backtested closed trade outputs generated for the DHR equity asset on a 15-minute timeframe between September 16, 2019, and October 15, 2026. The metrics reflect non-leveraged percentage sums across completed trades. Performance metrics do not include real-world execution costs, slippage, commission fee structures, tax implications, or corporate action adjustments unless explicitly stated. Recent period calculations isolate closed trades whose exit timestamp occurred on or after June 1, 2024 UTC. Historical simulated backtested results are provided strictly for research and quantitative analysis purposes and do not guarantee future performance or constitute financial advice.

Vollständige Strategieanalyse