Status des US-Aktienmarkts wird geladen…
➜
SO STARTEN SIE
Schließen Sie die vollständige Systemeinrichtung in wenigen Minuten ab.
Schnellstart-Anleitung öffnen →
Öffentlicher Katalog · DEVIOLAB

TRADING-STRATEGIEN UND BOTS

Wählen Sie eine Trading-Strategie und aktivieren Sie einen Bot, der automatisch nach ihren Regeln handelt.
Eine Strategie legt die Kauf- und Verkaufsregeln fest. Ein Trading-Bot führt sie über die API einer unterstützten Börse aus. Sie können die gewählte Strategie auch als Signal-Bot mit Telegram- und E-Mail-Benachrichtigungen nutzen.
FILTER
Wählen Sie Core 1 für einen ausgewogenen Start, wählen Sie eine Börse für den Handel und finden Sie den gewünschten Ticker. Die Filter wirken zusammen.
Sektor- und Gruppenfilter
Handelsbörse?Zeigt laut letzter Normalisierung Instrumente für SPOT-Handel gegen USDT. Klicken Sie erneut auf die gewählte Börse, um alle Börsen anzuzeigen.
A · Agilent Technologies Inc. (4) AAOI · Applied Optoelectronics Inc. (5) AAPL · Apple Inc. (7) ABBV · AbbVie Inc. (4) ABNB · Airbnb Inc. (4) ABT · Abbott Laboratories (4) ACGL · Arch Capital Group Ltd. (4) ACN · Accenture PLC Class A (4) ADBE · Adobe Inc. (3) ADI · Analog Devices Inc. (4) ADM · Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (4) ADP · Automatic Data Processing Inc. (4) ADSK · Autodesk Inc. (4) AEE · Ameren Corporation (4) AEP · American Electric Power Company, Inc. (4) AES · The AES Corporation (3) AFL · Aflac Incorporated (4) AIG · American International Group, Inc. (4) AIZ · Assurant Inc. (4) AJG · Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (4) AKAM · Akamai Technologies Inc. (4) ALAB · Astera Labs, Inc. (7) ALB · Albemarle Corporation (4) ALGN · Align Technology Inc. (4) ALL · The Allstate Corporation (3) ALLE · Allegion plc (4) ALNY · Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (4) AMAT · Applied Materials Inc. (6) AMCR · Amcor plc (4) AMD · Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (7) AME · AMETEK, Inc. (4) AMGN · Amgen Inc. (2) AMP · Ameriprise Financial Inc. (4) AMT · American Tower Corporation (4) AMZN · Amazon.com Inc. (7) ANET · Arista Networks Inc. (4) AON · Aon plc Class A (4) AOS · A. O. Smith Corporation (4) APA · APA Corporation (4) APD · Air Products and Chemicals Inc. (4) APH · Amphenol Corp. (4) APO · Apollo Global Management Inc. (4) APP · AppLovin Corporation (4) APTV · Aptiv PLC (4) ARE · Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (4) ARES · Ares Management Corp. (4) ARM · Arm Holdings plc ADR (7) ASML · ASML Holding N.V. NY (7) ASTS · AST SpaceMobile Inc. (6) ATO · Atmos Energy Corporation (4) AVGO · Broadcom Inc. (7) AVY · Avery Dennison Corporation (4) AWK · American Water Works Company, Inc. (4) AXON · Axon Enterprise, Inc. (4) AXP · American Express Company (4) AZO · AutoZone, Inc. (4) BA · Boeing Co/The (4) BABA · Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. ADR (6) BAC · Bank of America Corp. (4) BALL · Ball Corporation (4) BAX · Baxter International Inc. (4) BBY · Best Buy Co., Inc. (4) BDX · Becton, Dickinson and Company (4) BE · Bloom Energy Corp. (5) BEN · Franklin Templeton Inc. (4) BF.B · Brown-Forman Corp. (4) BG · Bunge Global SA (4) BIIB · Biogen Inc. (4) BK · The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (4) BKNG · Booking Holdings Inc. (4) BKR · Baker Hughes Company (4) BLDR · Builders FirstSource Inc. (3) BLK · BlackRock Inc. (4) BMNR · BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (5) BMY · Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (3) BNY · Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (3) BR · Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (4) BRK.B · Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B (4) BRO · Brown & Brown Inc. (4) BSX · Boston Scientific Corp. (3) BX · Blackstone Inc. (4) BXP · BXP, Inc. (4) C · Citigroup Inc. (4) CAH · Cardinal Health Inc. (4) CARR · Carrier Global Corp. (4) CASY · Casey's General Stores, Inc. (4) CAT · Caterpillar Inc. (4) CB · Chubb Limited (4) CBOE · Cboe Global Markets Inc. (4) CBRE · CBRE Group Inc. (4) CCEP · Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (4) CCI · Crown Castle Inc. (4) CCL · Carnival Corporation Ltd. (4) CDNS · Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (4) CDW · CDW Corporation (3) CEG · Constellation Energy Corporation (4) CF · CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (4) CFG · Citizens Financial Group Inc. (4) CHD · Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (4) CHRW · C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. (4) CHTR · Charter Communications Inc. (4) CI · The Cigna Group (4) CIEN · Ciena Corporation (4) CINF · Cincinnati Financial Corporation (3) CL · Colgate-Palmolive Co. (4) CLX · The Clorox Company (4) CMCSA · Comcast Corp. (4) CME · CME Group Inc. (4) CMG · Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (4) CMI · Cummins Inc. (4) CMS · CMS Energy Corporation (3) CNC · Centene Corp. (4) CNP · CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (4) COF · Capital One Financial Corp. (4) COHR · Coherent Corp. (7) COIN · Coinbase Global Inc. (3) COO · The Cooper Companies, Inc. (3) COP · ConocoPhillips (4) COR · Cencora Inc. (4) COST · Costco Wholesale Corporation (4) CPAY · Corpay Inc. (4) CPRT · Copart, Inc. (4) CPT · Camden Property Trust (4) CRCL · Circle Internet Group Inc. (5) CRDO · Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (8) CRH · CRH plc (4) CRL · Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (4) CRM · Salesforce, Inc. (4) CRWD · CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (4) CSCO · Cisco Systems Inc. (4) CSGP · CoStar Group, Inc. (4) CSX · CSX Corporation (4) CTAS · Cintas Corporation (4) CTSH · Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. (3) CTVA · Corteva Inc. (4) CVNA · Carvana Co. (4) CVS · CVS Health Corporation (4) CVX · Chevron Corp. (4) D · Dominion Energy, Inc. (4) DAL · Delta Air Lines, Inc. (4) DASH · DoorDash, Inc. (4) DD · DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (4) DDOG · Datadog Inc. Class A (4) DE · Deere & Company (4) DELL · Dell Technologies Inc. (6) EWY · iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (6) FLNC · Fluence Energy, Inc. (7) GS · The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (6) HOOD · Robinhood Markets Inc. (7) IBM · International Business Machines Corporation (6) INTC · Intel Corporation (6) IREN · IREN Limited (7) LITE · Lumentum Holdings Inc. (6) META · Meta Platforms Inc. (7) MRVL · Marvell Technology, Inc. (6) MSFT · Microsoft Corporation (7) MSTR · Strategy Inc. (7) MU · Micron Technology Inc. (7) NFLX · Netflix Inc. (8) NOK · Nokia Corporation Sponsored ADR (7) NVDA · NVIDIA Corporation (7) PLTR · Palantir Technologies Inc. (7) PYPL · PayPal Holdings, Inc. (6) QQQ · Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (5) RKLB · Rocket Lab Corporation (4) SKHY · SK hynix Inc. ADR (3) SMCI · Super Micro Computer Inc. (6) SMH · VanEck Semiconductor ETF (4) SNDK · Sandisk Corp. (4) SOXS · Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (3) SPCX · Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (3) TSLA · Tesla, Inc. (6) TSM · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. ADR (5) USAR · USA Rare Earth, Inc. (3)
Übersicht der ausgewählten Strategie

DE · Deere & Company

Stock Universe · globaler Aktienmarkt
USD · NYSE · XNYS · United States
DE 0 +1125.36% 1TRAD-QKU2
Von DevioLab empfohlen · Core 2 iCore 2 ist die dynamischere, aggressivere DevioLab-Auswahl für einen Ticker. Sie nimmt höheres Risiko und tiefere Drawdowns für potenziell höhere Renditen in Kauf. Vergleichen Sie unten die Trades und Charts der verschiedenen Strategien und wählen Sie das passende Profil.
16Trades
81.3%Trefferquote
+18.71%Ø Trade
+75.42%Bester Trade
-7.30%Schlechtester Trade
+219.4%Annualisiert
Analytisches Strategieprofil · b46dbb1b70647c7e

DE Algorithmic Strategy Analysis: High-Conviction Macro Holdings and Asymmetric Return Profiles in 15-Minute Execution

This quantitative evaluation analyzes a high-conviction algorithmic trading strategy for DE on the 15-minute timeframe across a 7.08-year historical backtest. Operating with extreme selectivity, the strategy generated a cumulative return of 1,125.36% across just 16 completed traDEs, achieving an 81.25% win rate and a profit factor of 5.0. With an average holding duration of nearly 2,978 hours (approximately 124 days) and a maximum drawdown capped at 7.30%, the algorithm DEmonstrates how intraday polling can be harnessed to execute long-term, multi-month macro position traDEs. DEsigned to serve as DEcision logic for automated trading bots, trading robots, or quantitative trading agents, the strategy presents a compelling risk-adjusted profile characterized by asymmetric upsiDE and exceptionally low transaction frequency.

Analyse vom 16.10.2026. Die Strategiedaten werden separat aktualisiert.
Vollständige Analyse lesen

1. Strategy profile

The quantitative trading strategy evaluated here focuses on the equity asset DE, operating on a 15-minute candlestick chart interval. Spanning a 7.08-year testing history from September 16, 2019, through October 16, 2026, the strategy generated an aggregate historical simulated profit of 1,125.36%, translating to an annualized return metric of 219.37%. With a DEvioLab Score of 77.70, it holds the number 2 ranking among strategies evaluated for DE. DEspite evaluating market structure on a relatively fine 15-minute resolution, the strategy is characterized by extreme traDE selectivity, completing only 16 traDEs over the entire 7-year evaluation window. This setup illustrates a distinct DEsign moDEl where intraday data are monitored continuously to iDEntify rare structural entry points rather than to generate high-frequency turnover. In automated execution environments, this rule set functions as DEcision logic for trading bots, trading robots, or autonomous trading agents looking to capture prolonged equity trends while avoiding intraday noise and over-trading.

2. Trading rhythm and position duration

The operational caDEnce of this strategy DEparts radically from typical intraday 15-minute strategies. Across the 7.08 years of simulated execution, the average holding duration per traDE was 2,978.12 hours—equivalent to approximately 124 calendar days—with a median holding time of 1,472.38 hours (roughly 61.3 days). This indicates that while entries are timed using 15-minute resolution, positions are allowed to DEvelop over multi-month horizons. The frequency metrics reinforce this macroeconomic position-trading style. The strategy completes an average of 2.26 traDEs per year, or approximately 1 traDE per active month. The spacing between traDE exits is similarly wiDE, featuring an average of 158.95 days between closed positions and a median interval of 85 days. This structural combination of high-resolution entry monitoring and long holding durations minimizes traDE churn, creating a rhythm focused on multi-month trend capture rather than short-term price oscillation.

3. Quality of historical results

The performance profile exhibits exceptional win-rate efficiency paired with favorable traDE payoff asymmetry. Out of 16 completed historical traDEs, 13 resulted in net gains while only 3 were net losses, establishing an 81.25% win rate. The strategy generated a profit factor of 5.0, meaning total gross profits were five times the total gross losses. The average closed traDE return reached 18.71%, with a median traDE return of 14.67%. The best historical traDE achieved a gain of 75.42%, whereas the worst traDE suffered a loss of -7.30%. The top three winning traDEs collectively generated 51.62% of the strategy's total gross profit. While this confirms a DEgree of concentration in outlier moves, the substantial median traDE return of 14.67% DEmonstrates that profitability was broadly distributed across multiple successful multi-month trends rather than being DEpenDEnt solely on a single fortunate entry.

4. Risk, drawdown and losing behavior

Risk containment represents one of the strategy's most distinct historical attributes. The maximum peak-to-trough drawdown recorDEd across the entire 7.08-year backtest was 7.30%. Notably, this drawdown figure matches the worst single traDE loss of -7.30%, indicating that historical account equity DEclines were primarily driven by individual traDE exits rather than compounding series of consecutive losses. This drawdown behavior is further supported by streak metrics. The strategy's longest winning streak reached 7 consecutive profitable traDEs, whereas its longest losing streak remained capped at just 1 traDE. Because the strategy enters positions infrequently and holds them for multi-month spans, exposure risk is concentrated in market price fluctuations during active holdings rather than exposure to frequent execution events or sequential stop-outs.

5. Behavior through time and yearly stability

An examination of the yearly performance breakdown reveals consistent historical stability across varying market environments between 2020 and 2026: - 2020: 3 traDEs (2 wins, 1 loss), 66.67% win rate, sum of traDE returns +94.40% - 2021: 1 traDE (1 win, 0 losses), 100.00% win rate, sum of traDE returns +45.18% - 2022: 3 traDEs (3 wins, 0 losses), 100.00% win rate, sum of traDE returns +35.90% - 2023: 1 traDE (0 wins, 1 loss), 0.00% win rate, sum of traDE returns -3.78% - 2024: 1 traDE (1 win, 0 losses), 100.00% win rate, sum of traDE returns +19.30% - 2025: 3 traDEs (3 wins, 0 losses), 100.00% win rate, sum of traDE returns +33.73% - 2026: 4 traDEs (3 wins, 1 loss), 75.00% win rate, sum of traDE returns +74.59% Out of 7 calendar years, 6 produced positive net traDE outcomes. The only unprofitable year was 2023, which recorDEd a single traDE loss of -3.78%. Across all other years, traDE counts ranged between 1 and 4 per annum, DEmonstrating consistent performance stability without relying on localized cluster spikes in trading activity.

6. Recent period since 2024-06-01 versus full history

The recent eviDEnce window, DEfined by traDEs exiting on or after June 1, 2024, comprises 8 completed traDEs generating a cumulative traDE return sum of 127.62%. This means that 50% of the strategy's 16 total historical traDE exits occurred within this recent window spanning mid-2024 through late 2026. Comparing this recent period to the full dataset reveals an increase in traDE exit frequency during the final two years of the backtest. The strategy maintained high win rates in 2024 (100%), 2025 (100%), and 2026 (75%), generating 74.59% in cumulative traDE gains across 4 exits in 2026 alone. This indicates that the algorithm's multi-month position logic remained highly active and aligned with broaDEr market trends in recent years.

7. Strengths and limitations

The primary strength of this DE strategy lies in its outstanding return-to-drawdown efficiency. Combining an 81.25% win rate, a 5.0 profit factor, an 18.71% average traDE, and a maximum drawdown of just 7.30%, the historical profile DEmonstrates powerful asymmetric risk management. Furthermore, the low traDE count (2.26 traDEs per year) drastically limits exposure to market noise. Conversely, the principal limitation is the small statistical sample size. Generating only 16 completed traDEs over 7.08 years creates a wiDE statistical margin of error for backtested expectations. Additionally, long average holding times (~124 days) require patience and expose active positions to overnight gap risk, earnings releases, and macro shifts over multi-month periods. Finally, with the top three winning traDEs responsible for 51.62% of gross profits, overall performance relies on capturing large structural macro trends.

8. DEvioLab analytical conclusion

With a DEvioLab Score of 77.70 and a rank of #2 for DE, this quantitative strategy highlights the potential of using 15-minute price evaluation to direct long-term position trading. By filtering out day-to-day market volatility and executing only unDEr highly selective structural conditions, the algorithm historically captured major equity moves with minimal drawdown. For traDErs utilizing automated trading bots, trading robots, or quantitative trading agents, the strategy offers a low-turnover, macro-oriented DEcision mechanism. However, automated DEployers must weigh the impressive 5.0 profit factor and 81.25% win rate against the statistical constraints of a 16-traDE historical sample size and the operational discipline required to hold positions across several months.

9. Data scope and methodology

The metrics presented in this analysis are DErived from backtested, historical simulated trading results for DE on a 15-minute execution chart between September 16, 2019, and October 16, 2026. All figures, including win rates, average returns, holding periods, drawdowns, and profit factors, are computed strictly from completed closed traDE data. Simulated performance percentages represent mathematical backtest calculations and do not account for unstated live execution parameters such as slippage, broker commissions, borrow costs, diviDEnd adjustments, or exchange execution DElays. Historical results are non-predictive and do not guarantee future performance or live profitability.

Vollständige Strategieanalyse