Status des US-Aktienmarkts wird geladen…
SO STARTEN SIE
Schließen Sie die vollständige Systemeinrichtung in wenigen Minuten ab.
Schnellstart-Anleitung öffnen
Öffentlicher Katalog · DEVIOLAB

STRATEGIEKATALOG

Algorithmische Strategien erkunden, Performance vergleichen und die vollständige Historie jedes Modells öffnen.
Sie wissen nicht, wo Sie anfangen sollen?
1. Katalog 2. Core 1 auswählen 3. Zum Warenkorb hinzufügen 4. API-Schlüssel 5. Trading-Bot aktivieren
Unsere Empfehlung: verwenden Sie für die erste Einrichtung Core 1 — die primäre und stärker geschützte Auswahl von DevioLab. Core 2 ist für Nutzer gedacht, die bewusst ein höheres Risiko und tiefere Drawdowns akzeptieren.
i
Was sind Core 1 und Core 2?
DevioLab analysiert Krypto- und Aktienmarktstrategien und erstellt fertige Auswahlen, damit Sie nicht Hunderte Varianten manuell prüfen müssen.
★ Core 1
Eine von DevioLab ausgewählte Sammlung von Krypto- und Aktienstrategien als primäre, ausgewogenere und stärker geschützte Startoption mit Fokus auf Risiko- und Drawdown-Kontrolle.
◆ Core 2
Eine separate, aggressivere DevioLab-Auswahl für Nutzer, die bewusst höheres Risiko und tiefere Drawdowns für potenziell höhere Renditen akzeptieren.
AAOI · Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. (5) AAPL · Apple Inc. (7) ALAB · Astera Labs, Inc. (6) AMAT · Applied Materials, Inc. (6) AMD · Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (7) AMZN · Amazon.com, Inc. (6) ARM · Arm Holdings plc (5) ASML · ASML Holding N.V. (7) ASTS · AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (6) AVGO · Broadcom Inc. (6) BABA · Alibaba Group Holding Limited (6) BE · Bloom Energy Corporation (5) BMNR · BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (5) COHR · Coherent Corp. (5) CRCL · Circle Internet Group, Inc. (5) CRDO · Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (8) DELL · Dell Technologies Inc. (6) EWY · iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (6) FLNC · Fluence Energy, Inc. (7) GS · The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (6) HOOD · Robinhood Markets, Inc. (7) IBM · International Business Machines Corporation (6) INTC · Intel Corporation (6) IREN · IREN Limited (7) LITE · Lumentum Holdings Inc. (6) META · Meta Platforms, Inc. (7) MRVL · Marvell Technology, Inc. (6) MSFT · Microsoft Corporation (7) MSTR · Strategy Inc (8) MU · Micron Technology, Inc. (7) NFLX · Netflix, Inc. (7) NOK · Nokia Oyj (7) NVDA · NVIDIA Corporation (7) PLTR · Palantir Technologies Inc. (8) PYPL · PayPal Holdings, Inc. (5) QQQ · Invesco QQQ Trust (6) RKLB · Rocket Lab Corporation (4) SKHY · SK hynix Inc. (3) SMCI · Super Micro Computer, Inc. (5) SMH · VanEck Semiconductor ETF (4) SNDK · Sandisk Corporation (4) SOXS · Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (3) SPCX · Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (3) TSLA · Tesla, Inc. (6) TSM · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (4) USAR · USA Rare Earth, Inc. (4)
Übersicht der ausgewählten Strategie

MSFTBUSDT

Aktieninstrument · Ausführung über Binance
MSFTB 0 +1293.15% 1TRAD-TUF3
20Trades
85.0%Trefferquote
+15.85%Ø Trade
+59.99%Bester Trade
-11.91%Schlechtester Trade
+157.8%Annualisiert
Analytisches Strategieprofil · b0c3cd7e0707e609

MSFT · Microsoft Corporation Quantitative Strategy Analysis: High-Conviction Algorithmic Model on 15-Minute Horizon

Quantitative review of the top-ranked algorithmic trading strategy for MSFT, achieving a 1293.15 percent total historical return and an 84.21 percent win rate over a 6.91-year evaluation period.

Vollständige Analyse lesen

Strategy profile

This quantitative trading model holds the number 1 rank for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) on DevioLab with a DevioLab Score of 80.60. Designed for a 15-minute timeframe, the strategy evaluates a historical dataset spanning from September 16, 2019 to August 14, 2026, representing 6.91 years of testing. Over this history, the algorithm logged a cumulative historical profit of 1293.15 percent, translating to an annualized return of 155.54 percent. The system is characterized by extreme trade selectivity within equity market structure.

Trading rhythm and position duration

The strategy is defined by an exceptionally low transaction frequency. Over nearly seven years of history, it completed only 19 trades, averaging 2.75 trades per year. While specific average and median holding hours are unpopulated in the raw statistical feed, the low trade count points toward an ultra-selective swing or positional architecture rather than short-term churning. It is explicitly not a scalping strategy, as long inactive periods are common.

Quality of historical results

Performance quality metrics represent the core strength of this system. Out of 19 closed trades, 16 were profitable, yielding an 84.21 percent win rate and a profit factor of 6.88. The average trade gain stands at 16.63 percent, while the median trade yield is 9.75 percent. The best single trade achieved a 59.99 percent return. The top 3 winning trades account for 46.08 percent of total gross profit, indicating moderate concentration on major expansion moves.

Risk, drawdown and losing behavior

Risk mitigation remains controlled across the testing span. The maximum historical drawdown was restricted to 15.14 percent, a conservative figure relative to the cumulative performance. The system suffered only 3 losing trades across the dataset, with the single worst trade losing -11.91 percent. The longest winning streak reached 12 consecutive wins, whereas the maximum consecutive loss streak was capped at 2 trades.

Behavior through time and yearly stability

The testing window spans nearly seven years from late 2019 through mid-2026. Detailed year-by-year logs are unpopulated in the raw statistical breakdown, but macro metrics demonstrate steady historical equity curve growth. Because entry triggers occur only 2.75 times per year on average, returns are naturally lumpier and tied to distinct structural volatility shifts.

Strengths and limitations

Key strengths include an exceptional profit factor of 6.88, a high win rate of 84.21 percent, and a modest maximum drawdown of 15.14 percent. The primary limitation is the small sample size of 19 trades over 6.91 years. This small sample increases statistical margin of error and requires significant discipline during extended periods of inactivity.

DevioLab analytical conclusion

The strategy demonstrates a highly effective, low-frequency historical approach for trading Microsoft Corporation on 15-minute charts. It prioritizes signal quality over volume. However, given the limited sample size of 19 trades, historical backtest performance should be analyzed cautiously and does not guarantee future results.

Data scope and methodology

This analysis relies on simulated historical closed spot trades for MSFT between September 16, 2019 and August 14, 2026. All percentage figures describe simulated past performance and do not represent actual live trading accounts or financial advice.

Vollständige Strategieanalyse