Loading US stock market status…
➜
HOW TO START
Complete the full system setup in just a few minutes.
Open Quick Start Guide →
Public catalog · DEVIOLAB

TRADING STRATEGIES & BOTS

Choose a trading strategy and activate a bot that will trade automatically by its rules.
A strategy defines the buying and selling rules. A trading bot executes those rules through the API of a supported exchange. You can also use the selected strategy as a signal bot with Telegram and email notifications.
FILTERS
Choose Core 1 for a balanced start, select an exchange for trading and find the ticker you need. Filters work together.
Trading exchange?Shows instruments available for SPOT trading against USDT according to the latest normalization. Click the selected exchange again to show all exchanges.
Selected strategy overview

DOGEUSDT

Crypto market · Binance
DOGE 215000 +10775628.54% 1TRAD-UQU8
Archived strategy
43Trades
90.7%Win rate
+26.84%Avg trade
+94.41%Best trade
-14.13%Worst trade
+1,530.7%Annualized
Strategy analytical profile · c2bd41927badb55e

DOGE Quantitative Strategy Analysis: Quantitative Evaluation of a High-Precision Long-Duration Model

An in-depth quantitative analysis of the core DOGE 15-minute trading strategy over a 5.26-year backtested period from July 2020 through October 2025. The strategy demonstrates a high win rate of 90.70% across 43 completed trades, achieving a Profit Factor of 6.67 and maintaining a maximum drawdown of 14.13%. Characterized by extended position holding times averaging 476.48 hours and a selective execution pace averaging 8.17 trades per year, the model exhibits exceptional return distribution across multi-year market cycles.

Analysis as of 27.08.2026. Strategy data is updated separately.
Read full analysis

Strategy profile

The strategy designated as DOGE 215000 +10775628.54% 1TRAD-UQU8 represents a core quantitative model evaluated on the 15-minute chart timeframe for DOGE in the cryptocurrency market. Spanning a historical evaluation window of 5.26 years between July 8, 2020, and October 12, 2025, the strategy generated 43 completed trades. It holds a DevioLab Score of 84.98, ranking second overall among strategies evaluated for the DOGE asset. A key architectural characteristic is the contrast between its execution interval and its trading frequency: despite monitoring price action on a 15-minute candle basis, the model executes with extreme selectivity, completing only 8.17 trades per year or roughly 1.48 trades per active month. Across the full sample, 39 of the 43 trades were profitable, establishing a 90.70% win rate. This combination of sparse trade generation and high directional accuracy produced a Profit Factor of 6.67 and an overall cumulative trade sum of 10,775,628.54%, corresponding to an annualized figure of 1,530.66%.

Trading rhythm and position duration

The temporal rhythm of this strategy reflects a long-duration position framework rather than intra-day scalping. The average holding duration across all completed positions is 476.48 hours (approximately 19.85 days), while the median holding duration stands at 196.75 hours (around 8.20 days). This structural divergence between the mean and median holding times indicates a right-skewed duration distribution: while half of all trades resolve within slightly over a week, a subset of positions remains open for several weeks or months to capture extended trends. The spacing between trade exits further highlights this patient cadence. The average interval between completed trade exits is 40.75 days, with a median inter-exit time of 25.70 days. Consequently, the strategy spends substantial periods waiting for specific statistical entry setups on the 15-minute price series without generating unnecessary turnover. Market participants analyzing this rhythm should note that position holding spans multi-day to multi-week horizons, requiring tolerance for ongoing exposure across fluctuating market environments.

Quality of historical results

Evaluating payoff metrics reveals that historical performance is driven by high win consistency backed by favorable gain magnitudes per trade. The average completed trade return is +26.84%, while the median trade return is +22.72%. The close alignment between average and median returns demonstrates that profitability is robustly distributed across winning trades rather than being skewed by single extreme events. The strategy recorded a best individual trade of +94.41% against a worst trade of -14.13%. A critical quantitative metric supporting result quality is the concentration of gross profit: the top three winning trades account for 21.62% of total gross profit across the dataset. Because less than a quarter of total gross gains are tied to the three largest trades, the model demonstrates broad-based profitability across its 39 winning trades. With a Profit Factor of 6.67, total gross profits exceeded total gross losses by more than sixfold, confirming that high win frequency was accompanied by adequate trade expectation.

Risk, drawdown and losing behavior

The historical risk profile of the strategy is defined by tight drawdown containment and minimal loss clustering. Over the 5.26-year evaluation window, the maximum closed-trade peak-to-trough drawdown was 14.13%. Notably, this drawdown figure matches the magnitude of the strategy's worst single trade (-14.13%), illustrating that downside equity contractions were primarily driven by individual trade exits rather than compounding series of consecutive losses. The maximum recorded losing streak throughout the entire sample is exactly 1 trade, meaning that every losing position across the dataset was immediately followed by a winning trade. Conversely, the longest winning streak reached 18 consecutive trades. Out of 43 total trades, only 4 resulted in negative returns. This structural asymmetry between winning frequency and loss occurrence contributed to maintaining drawdowns within moderate boundaries relative to overall equity growth.

Behavior through time and yearly stability

Annual performance data reveal sustained efficiency across differing yearly market regimes from 2021 through late 2025. In 2021, the strategy recorded 13 trades with 12 wins and 1 loss (92.31% win rate), generating a summed return of +286.81%. In 2022, activity slowed to 6 trades, all of which were profitable (100% win rate), delivering a combined return of +208.21%. The year 2023 represented the most selective period, producing just 2 trades, both profitable (100% win rate), with a summed gain of +135.65%. Trading frequency expanded in 2024 to 14 trades, yielding 13 wins and 1 loss (92.86% win rate) for a yearly summed return of +351.74%. In the partial year of 2025 through October, the strategy completed 8 trades with 6 wins and 2 losses (75.00% win rate), yielding +171.62%. Across all five calendar years, the strategy achieved positive net summed returns and maintained annual win rates of 75.00% or higher, reflecting historical stability across macro shifts.

Recent period since 2024-06-01 versus full history

Evaluating the recent performance sample beginning June 1, 2024, provides insight into current strategy behavior compared to its long-term baseline. Between June 1, 2024, and October 12, 2025, the strategy completed 15 trades, representing 34.88% of all 43 historical trades. These recent 15 trades accumulated a summed gain of +342.22%. Comparing this recent sample against the full history shows an accelerated trading frequency, with 15 trades occurring in roughly 16.4 months compared to 28 trades over the preceding four years. Despite the increase in trade cadence, performance metrics remained aligned with historical norms: 13 of the 15 recent trades were profitable, matching the full-history win rate profile. This recent evidence demonstrates that the model retained its historical edge in recent market conditions rather than experiencing decay in trade selection quality.

Strengths and limitations

The primary structural strengths of this strategy include its exceptional win rate of 90.70%, strong Profit Factor of 6.67, controlled maximum drawdown of 14.13%, and low profit concentration where the top three trades contribute only 21.62% of gross profits. Furthermore, the absence of multi-trade losing streaks historically highlights disciplined downside containment. Conversely, the strategy presents distinct analytical limitations. The most prominent constraint is the small total sample size of 43 completed trades across 5.26 years. From a quantitative perspective, sparse trade samples increase sensitivity to future statistical variance. Additionally, long average holding durations of 476.48 hours mean that capital remains committed to single positions for extended windows, exposing positions to overnight and trend-reversal risks. Extended inactive periods, averaging 40.75 days between exits, also require significant patience from operators accustomed to higher-frequency models.

DevioLab analytical conclusion

The strategy DOGE 215000 +10775628.54% 1TRAD-UQU8 achieves its DevioLab Score of 84.98 and second-place asset ranking through a rare balance of ultra-high directional accuracy and disciplined drawdown control. Operating as a macro-style swing model on a 15-minute price series, it avoids over-trading by filtered entry selection, resulting in only 43 completed trades over five years. The combination of a 90.70% win rate, an average trade gain of +26.84%, a maximum drawdown capped at 14.13%, and consistent annual profitability establishes a compelling historical profile. However, analysts must weigh these historical metrics against the compact sample size of 43 trades and understand that historical simulation results do not provide guarantees of future live execution outcomes.

Data scope and methodology

This analysis is based strictly on historical simulated backtest data provided for the asset DOGE on the 15-minute timeframe, covering the period from July 8, 2020, to October 12, 2025 (5.26 years). All performance metrics, including trade counts, win rates, holding durations, drawdowns, and annual breakdowns, are calculated from completed closed trades within the backtest environment. The statistics assume fixed historical price series data and do not incorporate live trading factors such as order execution slippage, exchange fees, liquidity constraints, or variable spread costs. This report is intended exclusively for quantitative strategy research and historical evaluation purposes and does not constitute financial or investment advice.

Full strategy analysis