Loading US stock market status…
➜
HOW TO START
Complete the full system setup in just a few minutes.
Open Quick Start Guide →
Public catalog · DEVIOLAB

TRADING STRATEGIES & BOTS

Choose a trading strategy and activate a bot that will trade automatically by its rules.
A strategy defines the buying and selling rules. A trading bot executes those rules through the API of a supported exchange. You can also use the selected strategy as a signal bot with Telegram and email notifications.
FILTERS
Choose Core 1 for a balanced start, select an exchange for trading and find the ticker you need. Filters work together.
Trading exchange?Shows instruments available for SPOT trading against USDT according to the latest normalization. Click the selected exchange again to show all exchanges.
Selected strategy overview

DASHUSDT

Crypto market · Binance
DASH 215000 +135516.34% 1TRAD-GEB2
Archived strategy
180Trades
70.6%Win rate
+5.35%Avg trade
+48.86%Best trade
-36.23%Worst trade
+1,202.6%Annualized
Strategy analytical profile · e6d4224ccdd9d70b

DASH Quantitative Strategy Analysis: Swing Dynamics, High Win-Rate Profile, and Multi-Day Duration Across 180 Historical Trades

An in-depth quantitative examination of the algorithmic swing strategy for DASH reveals a high-probability performance structure characterized by a 70.56% historical win rate and a Profit Factor of 2.62 across nearly six years of backtested execution. Operating on a 15-minute chart resolution for market monitoring, the system functions as a low-frequency, multi-day swing strategy, averaging 30.06 completed trades per year with a mean holding duration of 202.93 hours. Rather than relying on a handful of massive outlier trades, the strategy exhibits remarkable distribution balance, with the top three winning trades generating just 8.30% of total gross profit. Analysis of temporal performance highlights strong consistency from 2020 through 2025, supported by a recent sample of 58 trades yielding +326.14% since June 2024, despite a localized consolidation phase observed in early 2026.

Analysis as of 26.08.2026. Strategy data is updated separately.
Read full analysis

Strategy profile

The evaluated algorithmic strategy operates on the DASH spot/futures framework within the cryptocurrency market, utilizing a 15-minute price bar resolution to scan for trade opportunities over a history spanning from July 7, 2020, through July 3, 2026. Across this nearly six-year evaluation window, the system completed 180 closed trades, generating 127 winning outcomes against 53 losing outcomes. This distribution yields an overall historical win rate of 70.56% and an aggregate Profit Factor of 2.62. The cumulative sum of trade return percentages reaches 135,516.34%, corresponding to an annualized mathematical calculation of 1,202.55%. Although entry and exit signals are triggered on 15-minute candles, the system does not engage in rapid intraday scalping; instead, it utilizes the short-term chart grid to pinpoint entries for trades that develop over extended multi-day horizons. The quantitative metrics describe a patient, swing-oriented algorithmic model engineered to capture multi-day price swings while maintaining a conservative trade frequency.

Trading rhythm and position duration

The temporal parameters of the strategy reflect a distinct swing trading rhythm. Positions remain open for an average holding time of 202.93 hours (approximately 8.45 days), whereas the median holding duration sits at 118.13 hours (roughly 4.92 days). This divergence between mean and median holding times indicates a right-skewed duration profile: while a typical trade exits within five days, a subset of trades remains active for considerably longer periods to capture sustained trend movements. Output frequency is similarly restrained, averaging 30.06 trades per year, or approximately 2.69 completed positions per active month. Exits occur at an average interval of 12.10 days, with a median spacing of 8.45 days between completed trades. These metrics confirm that the 15-minute timeframe is used purely as a precise execution layer rather than a signal for high-turnover trading. The extended holding periods mean that live execution requires patience, as equity changes manifest slowly across long multi-day holding intervals.

Quality of historical results

A detailed evaluation of trade metrics demonstrates exceptional quality in payoff distribution and trade expectancies. The average closed trade yields a gain of 5.35%, while the median trade yield stands even higher at 6.21%. In quantitative strategy evaluation, a median return that exceeds the average return is a favorable structural signature; it confirms that profitability is driven by consistent baseline wins rather than being artificially inflated by a few extreme positive outliers. This broad-based performance is further corroborated by the concentration metric: the top three winning trades account for only 8.30% of gross accumulated profit. The single best historical trade generated a gain of 48.86%, whereas the worst trade incurred a loss of -36.23%. Combined with a Profit Factor of 2.62 and a 70.56% hit rate, the system relies on high signal reliability and broad-based profitability across the trade population rather than volatile high-payoff lottery structures.

Risk, drawdown and losing behavior

Risk characteristics within the dataset display a favorable streak profile alongside notable individual trade tail risk. The longest consecutive winning streak reached 11 trades, while the longest losing streak was limited to just 3 consecutive trades, reflecting the strong probability buffer provided by the 70.56% win rate. However, risk management metrics highlight potential drawdown exposure through individual trade magnitudes. The worst recorded historical trade was a severe -36.23% decline, demonstrating that when a position encounters adverse structural conditions, drawdowns on single trades can be substantial. Because the maximum portfolio drawdown percentage metric is uncalculated or null in the primary source dataset, overall historical drawdown depth must be inferred through trade-level path behavior. The combination of a maximum losing streak of 3 trades with a worst-trade loss of -36.23% suggests that equity curves experience brief losing sequences, but risk control heavily relies on managing single-trade downside extension.

Behavior through time and yearly stability

An examination of yearly performance metrics from 2020 through mid-2026 demonstrates consistent historical profitability across varying market environments, followed by recent divergence. In 2020, across 14 trades, the system achieved a 71.43% win rate and a cumulative return sum of +79.05%. Peak trade activity occurred in 2021, recording 41 trades, a 65.85% win rate, and a cumulative profit sum of +350.40%. Market conditions in 2022 and 2023 saw reduced activity, yielding 33 trades (+71.19% sum, 72.73% win rate) and 23 trades (+72.07% sum, 65.22% win rate) respectively. Efficiency accelerated markedly in 2024, delivering 24 trades with a 79.17% win rate and a +187.39% profit sum. This strong performance continued into 2025 with 28 trades, an 82.14% win rate, and a +240.13% cumulative return sum. However, the partial sample for 2026 (17 trades) recorded a win rate drop to 52.94% and a net return sum of -37.64%, illustrating an regime shift or performance contraction during the early 2026 market phase.

Recent period since 2024-06-01 versus full history

Isolating trades completed since June 1, 2024, provides a substantial sample to evaluate recent strategy dynamics relative to long-term averages. In this recent window, the strategy executed 58 trades, accumulating a combined sum of return percentages equal to +326.14%. This recent sample accounts for 32.22% of all 180 historical trades executed over the entire 5.99-year dataset. The concentration of trades during this 25-month span reflects heightened opportunity recognition during the late 2024 and 2025 bull market cycles in crypto assets. The average profit generated per trade during this recent window remains strong, aligned with the strategy's broader historical baseline despite the performance friction encountered in early 2026. The empirical evidence confirms that the strategy maintained robust functionality and trade frequency into recent market cycles.

Strengths and limitations

The primary quantitative strength of this DASH trading model lies in its broad profit distribution and high hit rate. With a 70.56% historical win rate, a Profit Factor of 2.62, and top three winning trades contributing less than 10% of gross gains, the strategy is not dependent on rare tail events. Position duration metrics (averaging 8.45 days) also limit transaction friction and exposure to short-term market noise. Conversely, material limitations exist. Single-trade downside volatility is prominent, as evidenced by the -36.23% worst trade. Furthermore, the low annualized trade count (30.06 trades/year) requires extensive observation periods to establish statistical confidence. The loss observed in early 2026 (-37.64% across 17 trades) also underlines that the strategy can experience extended periods of negative equity performance when underlying asset volatility or trending structures break down.

DevioLab analytical conclusion

From a quantitative research perspective, this DASH swing trading framework demonstrates a well-balanced historical profile. The model successfully pairs short-interval execution entries with multi-day position holding times, allowing it to capture structural price movements effectively. Its median return (6.21%) exceeding its mean return (5.35%) combined with a low gross profit concentration (8.30%) proves that historical returns stem from repeatable market edge rather than statistical anomalies. While the strategy lacks an assigned DevioLab rank or score in the provided dataset, the empirical metrics validate its historical efficacy as a moderate-frequency swing system. Analysts and system developers monitoring this model should focus primarily on trade-level stop mechanisms to mitigate heavy negative tail risks such as the -36.23% worst-case loss while navigating periodic market regime shifts.

Data scope and methodology

All analytical conclusions presented in this article are derived exclusively from historical simulated closed-trade statistics for DASH on the 15-minute timeframe between July 7, 2020, and July 3, 2026. The dataset encompasses 180 completed trades across 5.99 years of history. Metrics including win rates, holding durations, profit factors, and annual breakdowns describe backtested model outputs and do not represent actual live account execution, real-time order routing, slippage, exchange fees, or funding costs. Recent statistics post-June 1, 2024, are calculated strictly from trades with exit timestamps on or after 2024-06-01 UTC. This content is provided solely for quantitative strategy research and educational purposes and does not constitute investment advice or financial recommendations.

Full strategy analysis