Loading US stock market status…
➜
HOW TO START
Complete the full system setup in just a few minutes.
Open Quick Start Guide →
Public catalog · DEVIOLAB

TRADING STRATEGIES & BOTS

Choose a trading strategy and activate a bot that will trade automatically by its rules.
A strategy defines the buying and selling rules. A trading bot executes those rules through the API of a supported exchange. You can also use the selected strategy as a signal bot with Telegram and email notifications.
FILTERS
Choose Core 1 for a balanced start, select an exchange for trading and find the ticker you need. Filters work together.
Trading exchange?Shows instruments available for SPOT trading against USDT according to the latest normalization. Click the selected exchange again to show all exchanges.
Selected strategy overview

AIUSDT

Crypto market · Binance
AI 215000 +8577.11% 1TRAD-XMB5
Recommended by DevioLab · Core 2 iCore 2 is DevioLab’s more dynamic, aggressive selection for a ticker. It accepts higher risk and deeper drawdowns for potentially higher returns. A ticker can have several strategies; compare their trades and charts below and choose the profile that suits you.
52Trades
88.5%Win rate
+10.51%Avg trade
+91.47%Best trade
-44.28%Worst trade
+1,412.8%Annualized
Strategy analytical profile · f83775c44acf6b84

AI · AI Algorithmic Strategy Analysis: High-Win-Rate Performance and the Statistical Realities of Recent Inactivity

This quantitative research report evaluates the top-ranked algorithmic trading strategy for AI (AI · AI) on the 15-minute execution timeframe. Characterized by an extraordinary 88.46% historical win rate, a profit factor of 4.38, and a cumulative backtested return of +8577.11% across 52 completed trades, the strategy demonstrates remarkable mathematical efficiency during active periods. However, deep analysis of the statistical dataset reveals an important structural anomaly: all 52 trade executions took place during an initial active window, with zero closed trades recorded since June 1, 2024. This report examines the interplay between high payoff consistency, single-trade tail risk where maximum drawdown exactly mirrors the worst single loss of -44.28%, and the analytical limitations imposed by a concentrated sample size.

Analysis as of 22.08.2026. Strategy data is updated separately.
Read full analysis

Strategy profile

The quantitative model designated as AI 215000 +8577.11% 1TRAD-XMB5 operates on the crypto asset AI (AI · AI) using a 15-minute candlestick evaluation interval. Within the DevioLab analytical framework, the strategy holds the number one rank for its specific ticker, earning a DevioLab score of 73.69 and classification as an independent best core strategy. Across a historical dataset spanning 2.63 years from January 4, 2024, to August 21, 2026, the model logged 52 completed trades. These executions yielded a cumulative historical simulated return of +8577.11%, corresponding to an annualized benchmark rate of 1412.82%. The foundational statistical driver of this performance is a high hit rate: 46 of the 52 total trades closed in positive territory, producing an 88.46% win rate against just 6 losing trades. Combined with a profit factor of 4.38, the overall historical profile reflects a highly selective trading system designed to capture directional moves while strictly limiting the frequency of adverse executions.

Trading rhythm and position duration

Despite operating on a 15-minute bar interval, the strategy exhibits a low overall trade frequency. Generating 52 completed trades over 2.63 years translates to an average annualized trade frequency of 19.78 trades per year. This demonstrates that the algorithm does not engage in continuous market exposure or high-frequency churn; rather, it filters price action aggressively, entering positions only when specific statistical conditions are satisfied. Specific duration statistics, such as average holding hours, median holding hours, and days between exits, are not present in the supplied strategy dataset. Consequently, while the execution cadence can be evaluated through the lens of annual trade count, the exact distribution of intra-trade holding times remains undisclosed. What can be directly inferred from the 19.78 trades-per-year rate is that position exits occur sparsely, indicating multi-day or selective swing-style exposure rather than intraday noise scalping.

Quality of historical results

Evaluating trade return distribution reveals exceptional alignment between central tendency metrics. The historical average trade gain stands at +10.51%, while the median trade return is +10.60%. In quantitative evaluation, an average trade metric that closely mirrors the median trade metric signifies high payoff symmetry across historical winning events. This indicates that total system profitability was not artifically skewed by a single hyper-outlier, but rather built upon repeatable, consistently sized positive trades. Although the strategy achieved a maximum single best trade of +91.47%, gross profit concentration remains relatively distributed: the three largest winning trades account for 26.05% of cumulative gross profits. This moderate concentration level confirms that while top performers contributed meaningfully to overall gains, the broader historical return engine was supported by a wide cluster of trades returning near the 10.5% median gain mark.

Risk, drawdown and losing behavior

The downside profile of the strategy presents a compelling mathematical relationship between losing streaks and extreme trade loss. The model experienced a maximum drawdown of 44.28% over its testing timeline. Crucially, the worst single completed trade in the dataset was exactly -44.28%, while the longest observed losing streak was strictly 1 trade. This structural alignment reveals that the maximum drawdown was not the result of prolonged negative sequences or compounding operational decay, but was instead produced by a single, severe adverse trade event. Conversely, the strategy demonstrated strong positive serial behavior, achieving a maximum winning streak of 11 consecutive profitable trades. The contrast between an 11-trade winning run and a single-trade drawdown of 44.28% underscores the primary risk tension inherent in the model: while winning trades occur with high regularity, downside exposure on rare losing events can be disproportionately severe if left unchecked by fixed percentage stop parameters.

Behavior through time and yearly stability

Granular annual breakdowns are not available within the provided dataset, as calendar-year statistical arrays were not generated. However, the overarching historical timeline from January 4, 2024, to August 21, 2026, offers clear empirical insights when analyzed alongside trade density metrics. The entire backtested window spans 2.63 years, yet the total volume of completed trades is capped at 52. Evaluating the temporal distribution of these 52 trades against recent execution logs reveals that trade generation was highly concentrated during specific early market phases rather than uniformly distributed across the entire 31-month timeline.

Strengths and limitations

The strategy exhibits notable quantitative strengths alongside structural limitations. On the positive side, an 88.46% win rate paired with a 4.38 profit factor reflects high accuracy during active trading conditions. The symmetry between the average trade (+10.51%) and median trade (+10.60%) confirms consistent payout quality across successful entries, while a top-three winner concentration of 26.05% indicates broad profit distribution across winning trades. Conversely, the strategy is constrained by significant sample limitations. With only 52 total trades generated across 2.63 years and zero active trades recorded after June 1, 2024, statistical confidence in long-term robustness is reduced. Furthermore, the single worst trade of -44.28% highlights severe downside tail risk, demonstrating that individual losing trades can inflict substantial drawdown damage.

DevioLab analytical conclusion

Ranking first for the AI asset with a DevioLab score of 73.69, this algorithmic strategy represents an intriguing case study in trade selectivity and payout consistency. The empirical evidence proves that during its active historical window in early 2024, the model captured high-probability directional trends with remarkable efficiency, delivering +8577.11% cumulative gain across 52 trades. However, analysts must weigh these historical returns against the single-trade drawdown peak of 44.28% and the extended structural dormancy observed since June 2024. The strategy serves as a prime example of high-precision trading logic that achieves impressive backtested metrics but requires ongoing evaluation to determine whether future market regimes will trigger actionable trade signals.

Data scope and methodology

All figures, performance metrics, and trade statistics presented in this report are derived strictly from historical simulated backtest data for the AI trading pair on a 15-minute bar timeframe over the period spanning January 4, 2024, to August 21, 2026. Trade statistics reflect closed transaction metrics calculated without slippage, execution delays, or live broker fee adjustments, and do not represent actual live account balances or real-time trading execution. Historical performance metrics are strictly retrospective and do not guarantee or predict future trading results.

Full strategy analysis